Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: reply-to munging

2020-03-13 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 08:53:39AM -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 09:09:39PM +0100, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, 12. März 2020, 20:23:56 CET schrieb Michał Górny:
> > > I suppose that a part of the problem is the default Reply-To in these
> > > mails.
>  
> Yes, I agree that this is a problem.
> 
> > Which was deliberately added...
> 
> Why was this added? I have asked before and never gotten an answer.

TL;DR specifically because gentoo-commits can only be emailed by the
bots, and not everybody is on the other list anyway.

infra/cfengine.git:
commit 2d1156486f8f09ed4747a61d194928b05fdc974f
Date:   Fri Feb 4 01:51:31 2011 +

It sets the Reply-To to be gentoo-dev@lists.g.o AND the change
committer, on the basis that:
- developers are NOT required to subscribe to gentoo-dev@ (that's why
  gentoo-dev-announce@ exists, which is mandatory).
- Not every committer is a developer: the script is used for many repos,
  not just repo/gentoo.git

-- 
Robin Hugh Johnson
Gentoo Linux: Dev, Infra Lead, Foundation Treasurer
E-Mail   : robb...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85
GnuPG FP : 7D0B3CEB E9B85B1F 825BCECF EE05E6F6 A48F6136


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[gentoo-dev] rfc: reply-to munging

2020-03-13 Thread William Hubbs
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 09:09:39PM +0100, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 12. März 2020, 20:23:56 CET schrieb Michał Górny:
> > I suppose that a part of the problem is the default Reply-To in these
> > mails.
 
Yes, I agree that this is a problem.

> Which was deliberately added...

Why was this added? I have asked before and never gotten an answer.

Thanks,

William


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature