On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 4:08 AM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
>
> But on slower machines, as I am used to fast ones, I tend to notice the lack
> of parallellism during the emerge-phase.
>
Diego used to point out that lack of parallelism was always a
challenge with running a tinderbox. You can have 32 cor
On Sunday, September 07, 2014 05:57:57 PM Joshua Kinard wrote:
> On 09/07/2014 17:04, Rich Freeman wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Joshua Kinard
wrote:
> >> As for Parallel builds, do you make make -jX? Or running concurrent
> >> emerges in different shells? I wasn't commenting a
> On Sun, 07 Sep 2014, Joshua Kinard wrote:
> On 09/07/2014 16:45, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> There's neither nano nor any other specific editor in the system set,
>> to start with. There is virtual/editor which I think is the best
>> choice, unless we would decide that no editor is needed at al
On 09/07/2014 17:57, Joshua Kinard wrote:
>
> As for net-tools itself, I'll see if I can get Fedora's patches to apply to
> it and update it. If not, I dunno whether to import their version as a
> separate package or as an alternate version (net-tools-2.0?). No point in
> ignoring it when there'
On 09/07/2014 17:04, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Joshua Kinard wrote:
>> And thus, I was referring only to @system, not a stage3. I think an editor
>> should be in @system, but as much as I like nano, I know the ncurses
>> dependency won't sit well with everyone. If @sy
On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Joshua Kinard wrote:
> And thus, I was referring only to @system, not a stage3. I think an editor
> should be in @system, but as much as I like nano, I know the ncurses
> dependency won't sit well with everyone. If @system is supposed to be a
> minimal-working sys
On 09/07/2014 16:45, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> On Sun, 07 Sep 2014, Joshua Kinard wrote:
>
>> And thus, I was referring only to @system, not a stage3. I think an
>> editor should be in @system, but as much as I like nano, I know the
>> ncurses dependency won't sit well with everyone. If @system
> On Sun, 07 Sep 2014, Joshua Kinard wrote:
> And thus, I was referring only to @system, not a stage3. I think an
> editor should be in @system, but as much as I like nano, I know the
> ncurses dependency won't sit well with everyone. If @system is
> supposed to be a minimal-working system, a
On 09/07/2014 16:01, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Joshua Kinard wrote:
>> IMHO, I think @system should maintain at least one editor and include
>> some kind of networking diagnostic package.
>
> Why is it important that we not be able to parallel build an editor? Is
> i
On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Joshua Kinard wrote:
> IMHO, I think @system should maintain at least one editor and include some
> kind of networking diagnostic package.
Why is it important that we not be able to parallel build an editor?
Is it such a frequent build-time dependency that we woul
On 09/05/2014 13:34, William Hubbs wrote:
> All,
>
> there is a bug open requesting that we add sys-apps/iproute2 to the
> system set [1]. Originally the request was to drop net-tools, but it has
> become just adding iproute2.
>
> If no one objects, I would like to do this sometime in the next 72
11 matches
Mail list logo
