On 12:39 Sun 07 Aug, William Hubbs wrote:
> All,
>
> I have spoken with floppym about this (he is the primary maintainer of
> grub2), and he told me to go for it if I want to take on the project, so
> I want some thoughts.
>
> Currently, grub2 defaults, with the multislot use flag on, to
On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 08:28:32PM +0200, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> It will require a lot of documentation updates (wiki, handbook etc) so I
> wonder if you don't need symlinks for the grub2* names for a while even
> so to ensure compatibility for a deprecation period. New users aren't
>
On Sun, 7 Aug 2016 12:39:28 -0500
William Hubbs wrote:
>
> I feel that new installs don't need multislot since they won't be
> migrating from grub legasy, so I want to turn the multislot flag off
> in the grub2 ebuilds.
>
> Thoughts?
Fine by me. The difference between us
On 08/07/2016 07:39 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> All,
>
> I have spoken with floppym about this (he is the primary maintainer of
> grub2), and he told me to go for it if I want to take on the project, so
> I want some thoughts.
>
..
>
> So, again, this would affect new installs, but users can
All,
I have spoken with floppym about this (he is the primary maintainer of
grub2), and he told me to go for it if I want to take on the project, so
I want some thoughts.
Currently, grub2 defaults, with the multislot use flag on, to renaming
things away from upstream -- for example,