Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: turning off grub2 multislot use flag

2016-11-01 Thread Consus
On 12:39 Sun 07 Aug, William Hubbs wrote: > All, > > I have spoken with floppym about this (he is the primary maintainer of > grub2), and he told me to go for it if I want to take on the project, so > I want some thoughts. > > Currently, grub2 defaults, with the multislot use flag on, to

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: turning off grub2 multislot use flag

2016-08-07 Thread William Hubbs
On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 08:28:32PM +0200, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > It will require a lot of documentation updates (wiki, handbook etc) so I > wonder if you don't need symlinks for the grub2* names for a while even > so to ensure compatibility for a deprecation period. New users aren't >

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: turning off grub2 multislot use flag

2016-08-07 Thread James Le Cuirot
On Sun, 7 Aug 2016 12:39:28 -0500 William Hubbs wrote: > > I feel that new installs don't need multislot since they won't be > migrating from grub legasy, so I want to turn the multislot flag off > in the grub2 ebuilds. > > Thoughts? Fine by me. The difference between us

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: turning off grub2 multislot use flag

2016-08-07 Thread Kristian Fiskerstrand
On 08/07/2016 07:39 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > All, > > I have spoken with floppym about this (he is the primary maintainer of > grub2), and he told me to go for it if I want to take on the project, so > I want some thoughts. > .. > > So, again, this would affect new installs, but users can

[gentoo-dev] rfc: turning off grub2 multislot use flag

2016-08-07 Thread William Hubbs
All, I have spoken with floppym about this (he is the primary maintainer of grub2), and he told me to go for it if I want to take on the project, so I want some thoughts. Currently, grub2 defaults, with the multislot use flag on, to renaming things away from upstream -- for example,