-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Tue, 08 Jul 2008 18:34:46 +0200
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I suppose you mean git. Since it tracks content and not files, moves
are trivial. Git actually finds your moves for you, after you've
moved
On 12:07 Wed 09 Jul , Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Tue, 08 Jul 2008 18:34:46 +0200
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I suppose you mean git. Since it tracks content and not files, moves
are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joe Peterson wrote:
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
I meant moves were largely pointless, although categories are to a
lesser extent. Tags would be a lot better, since nothing can be
categorized perfectly into a single place.
Yes, I can see the
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
I suppose you mean git. Since it tracks content and not files, moves are
trivial. Git actually finds your moves for you, after you've moved content
around; such as when doing a bump.
Even better!
-Joe
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On Tue, 08 Jul 2008 18:34:46 +0200
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I suppose you mean git. Since it tracks content and not files, moves
are trivial. Git actually finds your moves for you, after you've
moved content around; such as when doing a bump.
Ever tried git on an ebuild
Hello *,
Wouldn't it be nice to move scipy from sci-libs to dev-python? All similar
and related packages live in dev-python: numeric, scientificpython,
matplotlib... I know that moving packages is a major pain in the #$$, but
the present situation seems illogical (I would never guess to
On 02:59 Tue 08 Jul , Andrey Grozin wrote:
Wouldn't it be nice to move scipy from sci-libs to dev-python? All
similar and related packages live in dev-python: numeric,
scientificpython, matplotlib... I know that moving packages is a major
pain in the #$$, but the present situation seems
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
I actually object to having crap in dev-python, because things should be
categorized functionally instead of by the language they're implemented
in. 90% of the time you don't care about the language. But category
moves are pretty much pointless, so I don't normally
On 21:51 Mon 07 Jul , Joe Peterson wrote:
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
I actually object to having crap in dev-python, because things should be
categorized functionally instead of by the language they're implemented
in. 90% of the time you don't care about the language. But category
On Mon, 7 Jul 2008, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
I actually object to having crap in dev-python, because things should be
categorized functionally instead of by the language they're implemented
in. 90% of the time you don't care about the language. But category
moves are pretty much pointless, so I
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
I meant moves were largely pointless, although categories are to a
lesser extent. Tags would be a lot better, since nothing can be
categorized perfectly into a single place.
Yes, I can see the benefit of a tag paradigm. I, myself, find it more
trouble than benefit to
11 matches
Mail list logo
