On Wednesday 15 February 2006 10:35, solar wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 18:09 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Tuesday 14 February 2006 17:02, Tristan Hill wrote:
> > > I'm updating the rpm ebuild[1]. Without any modifications the
> > > executables are statically compiled and I get the QA mes
On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 18:09 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tuesday 14 February 2006 17:02, Tristan Hill wrote:
> > I'm updating the rpm ebuild[1]. Without any modifications the
> > executables are statically compiled and I get the QA message about
> > executable stacks. However, removal of "-s
On Tuesday 14 February 2006 23:02, Tristan Hill wrote:
> I'm updating the rpm ebuild[1]. Without any modifications the
> executables are statically compiled and I get the QA message about
> executable stacks. However, removal of "-static" from the compilation
> flags in ./configure also stops gen
On Tuesday 14 February 2006 17:02, Tristan Hill wrote:
> I'm updating the rpm ebuild[1]. Without any modifications the
> executables are statically compiled and I get the QA message about
> executable stacks. However, removal of "-static" from the compilation
> flags in ./configure also stops gen
I'm updating the rpm ebuild[1]. Without any modifications the
executables are statically compiled and I get the QA message about
executable stacks. However, removal of "-static" from the compilation
flags in ./configure also stops generation of an executable stack. The
information about executab
