I've been thinking about Solar's email. I believe Solar is actually
very correct in his assessment.
I think I'll recant my initial statement about devrel. To KingTaco and
the gang: my apologies, you guys did the right thing at the time.
Thanks,
Seemant
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Mike Doty wrote:
>> It is devrels place to attempt to stop the fighting. This is what I
>> did. I clearly indicate that this is temporary and when the council is
>> willing to clear this nonsense up, it will supersede anything I put
>> forth yesterday.
>
> I agree that i
Mike Doty wrote:
> It is devrels place to attempt to stop the fighting. This is what I
> did. I clearly indicate that this is temporary and when the council is
> willing to clear this nonsense up, it will supersede anything I put
> forth yesterday.
I agree that it is devrel's place to help peopl
On Fri, 2006-06-23 at 09:58 -0400, Ned Ludd wrote:
> With respects to Gentoo trademarks. That is a foundation issue and
> would have to be raised with them.
Well, if it doesn't follow the guidelines[1], then it is improper usage
and would either need to adhere to the guidelines or quit using our
t
Stuart Herbert wrote:
> On 6/23/06, Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm amazingly confused about why technical policy decisions (and even
>> discussions about them) are being made by devrel in a devrel-specific
>> channel. Could someone clear me up on this?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Donnie
>
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Mike Doty wrote:
>> All-
>>
>> We've had a discussion about sunrise and have reached a compromise.
>> Someone will summarize it later, I've attached the raw logs for now.
>> Until the council makes a firm decision about non-gentoo hosted
>> overlays, this will be the defini
On Thu, 2006-06-22 at 19:05 -0500, Mike Doty wrote:
> All-
>
> We've had a discussion about sunrise and have reached a compromise.
> Someone will summarize it later, I've attached the raw logs for now.
> Until the council makes a firm decision about non-gentoo hosted
> overlays, this will be the d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 23 Jun 2006, Stuart Herbert wrote:
On 6/23/06, Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm amazingly confused about why technical policy decisions (and even
discussions about them) are being made by devrel in a devrel-specific
channel
On 6/23/06, Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm amazingly confused about why technical policy decisions (and even
discussions about them) are being made by devrel in a devrel-specific
channel. Could someone clear me up on this?
Thanks,
Donnie
Sorry, but I must second this, especiall
Mike Doty wrote:
> All-
>
> We've had a discussion about sunrise and have reached a compromise.
> Someone will summarize it later, I've attached the raw logs for now.
> Until the council makes a firm decision about non-gentoo hosted
> overlays, this will be the defining method of dealing with them
All-
We've had a discussion about sunrise and have reached a compromise.
Someone will summarize it later, I've attached the raw logs for now.
Until the council makes a firm decision about non-gentoo hosted
overlays, this will be the defining method of dealing with them.
There will be a summary po
11 matches
Mail list logo
