On Tuesday 29 November 2011 15:09:33 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> we have USE=zlib already which should cover automatically pulling in zlib
> when necessary, and we have that by default in make.conf. so there's no
> need to explicitly list zlib as part of the system target. so time to
> drop it.
this
On Tuesday 29 November 2011 21:14:49 Matt Turner wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > we have USE=zlib already which should cover automatically pulling in zlib
> > when necessary, and we have that by default in make.conf. so there's no
> > need to explicitly list zl
On Tuesday 29 November 2011 21:14:49 Matt Turner wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > we have USE=zlib already which should cover automatically pulling in zlib
> > when necessary, and we have that by default in make.conf. so there's no
> > need to explicitly list zl
On 11/29/2011 06:14 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> we have USE=zlib already which should cover automatically pulling in zlib
>> when
>> necessary, and we have that by default in make.conf. so there's no need to
>> explicitly list zlib as part o
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> we have USE=zlib already which should cover automatically pulling in zlib when
> necessary, and we have that by default in make.conf. so there's no need to
> explicitly list zlib as part of the system target. so time to drop it.
> -mike
I
we have USE=zlib already which should cover automatically pulling in zlib when
necessary, and we have that by default in make.conf. so there's no need to
explicitly list zlib as part of the system target. so time to drop it.
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message
