Re: [gentoo-dev] util-linux build time increase?
On 3/1/2019 10:01, Mart Raudsepp wrote: > Ühel kenal päeval, N, 28.02.2019 kell 04:13, kirjutas Joshua Kinard: >> On 2/25/2019 05:18, Alexander Tsoy wrote: >>> В Пн, 25/02/2019 в 13:07 +0300, Alexander Tsoy пишет: В Чт, 21/02/2019 в 04:36 -0500, Joshua Kinard пишет: > Does anyone have an idea why util-linux's build time would go > up > significantly from 2.32.x to 2.33.x? It may be a MIPS thing, > as my > x86_64 > box shows no discernible change in build times between the same > versions. > Can any other archs check w/ genlop to see if they see a large > jump > in build > time? > > 'genlop -t util-linux' output on my SGI system (some entries > removed > for > brevity): > > Thu Feb 1 11:26:33 2018 >>> sys-apps/util-linux-2.31.1 >merge time: 27 minutes and 48 seconds. > > Sat Mar 31 08:07:20 2018 >>> sys-apps/util-linux-2.32 >merge time: 28 minutes and 44 seconds. > > Mon Aug 27 06:21:30 2018 >>> sys-apps/util-linux-2.32.1 >merge time: 32 minutes and 58 seconds. > > Tue Nov 13 10:03:58 2018 >>> sys-apps/util-linux-2.33 >merge time: 1 hour, 19 minutes and 49 seconds. > > Fri Jan 11 09:20:21 2019 >>> sys-apps/util-linux-2.33.1 >merge time: 1 hour, 23 minutes and 37 seconds. > > Thu Feb 21 04:14:33 2019 >>> sys-apps/util-linux-2.33.1 >merge time: 1 hour, 25 minutes and 15 seconds. > 2.33 was changed to use python-r1 eclass instead of python- single-r1 eclass. And the increase of build time seems caused by an out-of- source build for each python implementation. Some libraries are built several times (for native abi + for each python implementation). >>> >>> And there is additional configure run for each python >>> implementation. >> >> Hmm, this might explain things, somewhat. I think there's possibly >> some >> truth to the getcwd bit discussed earlier, but that may be limited to >> glibc >> only. > > Right, util-linux doesn't conduct that test. coreutils and tar do, > maybe some more. > That doesn't mean running with sandbox doesn't have a slowdown effect - > it most certainly does, just hopefully not so drastic as that > particular case - it involves glibc own generic getcwd being slow with > long paths, and sandbox calling it three times for its access checks > even for mkdir call, just to error with ENAMETOOLONG, in addition to > many getcwd calls the configure check itself does. So it's slow even > without sandbox, but with sandbox that slowness is doubled or more. > That has made me wonder if maybe by having some more ENAMETOOLONGs > earlier, the test would finish earlier, instead of slowly spinning > through paths that are in length between PATH_MAX and PATH_MAX*2, when > it's slow.. > But not sure why these m4 macros seems to be calling getcwd after each > mkdir+chdirm etc just to get a boolean configure check result. Didn't > look into the specific case, I only debugged the test case that just > loops mkdir+chdir. > Someone should maybe convert these project to meson and do that check > smarter :D > >> util-linux-2.33.1 on my uclibc-ng chroot took about ~25mins. Have to >> re-time the glibc build to see if it's something w/ the libc >> implementation. >> >> Temp workaround I guess is to cut down on the PYTHON_TARGETS before >> my next >> catalyst attempt. 2.7 + 3.7 should be enough... > > Personally I seem to get by with just USE=-python on util-linux (it's > actually not globally enabled on my systems, it seems). Otherwise, > sure, if the slowness is in configure. > > > Mart Yeah, I forgot I had a global 'python' USE set on the Octane. It's not been fun trying to disentangle the mess after removing it. But... Before: Thu Feb 21 04:14:33 2019 >>> sys-apps/util-linux-2.33.1 merge time: 1 hour, 25 minutes and 15 seconds. After: Sun Mar 3 03:22:26 2019 >>> sys-apps/util-linux-2.33.1 merge time: 18 minutes and 35 seconds. The above is also with sandbox disabled for now until the getcwd issue is fixed. If I'd known that sandbox slowed stuff down that much, I'd have stopped using it a long time ago. This machine is top of its class, but it's taking longer to build stuff as new versions come out due to new features being added, compiler taking longer, etc. I miss the days when this thing could build gcc in 3-4 hours. More like 14hrs now. -- Joshua Kinard Gentoo/MIPS ku...@gentoo.org rsa6144/5C63F4E3F5C6C943 2015-04-27 177C 1972 1FB8 F254 BAD0 3E72 5C63 F4E3 F5C6 C943 "The past tempts us, the present confuses us, the future frightens us. And our lives slip away, moment by moment, lost in that vast, terrible in-between." --Emperor Turhan, Centauri Republic
Re: [gentoo-dev] util-linux build time increase?
Ühel kenal päeval, N, 28.02.2019 kell 04:13, kirjutas Joshua Kinard: > On 2/25/2019 05:18, Alexander Tsoy wrote: > > В Пн, 25/02/2019 в 13:07 +0300, Alexander Tsoy пишет: > > > В Чт, 21/02/2019 в 04:36 -0500, Joshua Kinard пишет: > > > > Does anyone have an idea why util-linux's build time would go > > > > up > > > > significantly from 2.32.x to 2.33.x? It may be a MIPS thing, > > > > as my > > > > x86_64 > > > > box shows no discernible change in build times between the same > > > > versions. > > > > Can any other archs check w/ genlop to see if they see a large > > > > jump > > > > in build > > > > time? > > > > > > > > 'genlop -t util-linux' output on my SGI system (some entries > > > > removed > > > > for > > > > brevity): > > > > > > > > Thu Feb 1 11:26:33 2018 >>> sys-apps/util-linux-2.31.1 > > > >merge time: 27 minutes and 48 seconds. > > > > > > > > Sat Mar 31 08:07:20 2018 >>> sys-apps/util-linux-2.32 > > > >merge time: 28 minutes and 44 seconds. > > > > > > > > Mon Aug 27 06:21:30 2018 >>> sys-apps/util-linux-2.32.1 > > > >merge time: 32 minutes and 58 seconds. > > > > > > > > Tue Nov 13 10:03:58 2018 >>> sys-apps/util-linux-2.33 > > > >merge time: 1 hour, 19 minutes and 49 seconds. > > > > > > > > Fri Jan 11 09:20:21 2019 >>> sys-apps/util-linux-2.33.1 > > > >merge time: 1 hour, 23 minutes and 37 seconds. > > > > > > > > Thu Feb 21 04:14:33 2019 >>> sys-apps/util-linux-2.33.1 > > > >merge time: 1 hour, 25 minutes and 15 seconds. > > > > > > > > > > 2.33 was changed to use python-r1 eclass instead of python- > > > single-r1 > > > eclass. And the increase of build time seems caused by an out-of- > > > source > > > build for each python implementation. Some libraries are built > > > several > > > times (for native abi + for each python implementation). > > > > And there is additional configure run for each python > > implementation. > > Hmm, this might explain things, somewhat. I think there's possibly > some > truth to the getcwd bit discussed earlier, but that may be limited to > glibc > only. Right, util-linux doesn't conduct that test. coreutils and tar do, maybe some more. That doesn't mean running with sandbox doesn't have a slowdown effect - it most certainly does, just hopefully not so drastic as that particular case - it involves glibc own generic getcwd being slow with long paths, and sandbox calling it three times for its access checks even for mkdir call, just to error with ENAMETOOLONG, in addition to many getcwd calls the configure check itself does. So it's slow even without sandbox, but with sandbox that slowness is doubled or more. That has made me wonder if maybe by having some more ENAMETOOLONGs earlier, the test would finish earlier, instead of slowly spinning through paths that are in length between PATH_MAX and PATH_MAX*2, when it's slow.. But not sure why these m4 macros seems to be calling getcwd after each mkdir+chdirm etc just to get a boolean configure check result. Didn't look into the specific case, I only debugged the test case that just loops mkdir+chdir. Someone should maybe convert these project to meson and do that check smarter :D > util-linux-2.33.1 on my uclibc-ng chroot took about ~25mins. Have to > re-time the glibc build to see if it's something w/ the libc > implementation. > > Temp workaround I guess is to cut down on the PYTHON_TARGETS before > my next > catalyst attempt. 2.7 + 3.7 should be enough... Personally I seem to get by with just USE=-python on util-linux (it's actually not globally enabled on my systems, it seems). Otherwise, sure, if the slowness is in configure. Mart signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [gentoo-dev] util-linux build time increase?
On 2/28/19 10:16 AM, Joshua Kinard wrote:
> Is /usr/local/bin/emerge_time.sh a custom script of yours, or is it
> available somewhere else? I usually use genlop to measure merge times, but
> that package has a lengthy set of perl dependencies that I don't want to
> pull into the catalyst seed chroots I am building/updating.
Its just a a quick way to propagate this wrapper on multiple computers;
# cat /usr/local/bin/emerge_time.sh
#!/bin/bash
if [[ $# < 1 ]]; then
echo "Usage: ${0} ";
exit;
fi
qlop -tHvg "$1"
--
Kristian Fiskerstrand
OpenPGP keyblock reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] util-linux build time increase?
On 2/21/2019 16:18, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > On 2/21/19 1:29 PM, Guilherme Amadio wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 04:36:24AM -0500, Joshua Kinard wrote: >>> Does anyone have an idea why util-linux's build time would go up >>> significantly from 2.32.x to 2.33.x? It may be a MIPS thing, as my x86_64 >>> box shows no discernible change in build times between the same versions. >>> Can any other archs check w/ genlop to see if they see a large jump in build >>> time? >>> > > At least on a couple of my amd64 there isn't any noticeable slowdown. > similar to your own observations. E.g this laptop (Linux ares > 4.9.155-gentoo-kf0 #1 SMP Sun Feb 10 17:01:51 CET 2019 x86_64 Intel(R) > Xeon(R) CPU E3-1535M v5 @ 2.90GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux) says > > # /usr/local/bin/emerge_time.sh sys-apps/util-linux > util-linux-2.28.2: Thu Feb 9 18:52:32 2017: 1 minute, 9 seconds > util-linux-2.28.2: Thu Feb 9 19:56:31 2017: 1 minute, 37 seconds > util-linux-2.28.2: Fri Apr 21 20:05:52 2017: 35 seconds > util-linux-2.30.2: Thu Nov 23 18:59:23 2017: 55 seconds > util-linux-2.30.2: Mon Dec 4 22:08:07 2017: 38 seconds > util-linux-2.30.2: Wed Jan 10 20:44:39 2018: 44 seconds > util-linux-2.30.2-r1: Mon Mar 12 19:20:06 2018: 46 seconds > util-linux-2.32-r4: Sun Jul 15 15:51:21 2018: 50 seconds > util-linux-2.33-r1: Sun Jan 6 20:53:29 2019: 46 seconds > util-linux-2.33-r1: Thu Feb 21 22:16:25 2019: 53 seconds Is /usr/local/bin/emerge_time.sh a custom script of yours, or is it available somewhere else? I usually use genlop to measure merge times, but that package has a lengthy set of perl dependencies that I don't want to pull into the catalyst seed chroots I am building/updating. -- Joshua Kinard Gentoo/MIPS ku...@gentoo.org rsa6144/5C63F4E3F5C6C943 2015-04-27 177C 1972 1FB8 F254 BAD0 3E72 5C63 F4E3 F5C6 C943 "The past tempts us, the present confuses us, the future frightens us. And our lives slip away, moment by moment, lost in that vast, terrible in-between." --Emperor Turhan, Centauri Republic
Re: [gentoo-dev] util-linux build time increase?
On 2/25/2019 05:18, Alexander Tsoy wrote: > В Пн, 25/02/2019 в 13:07 +0300, Alexander Tsoy пишет: >> В Чт, 21/02/2019 в 04:36 -0500, Joshua Kinard пишет: >>> Does anyone have an idea why util-linux's build time would go up >>> significantly from 2.32.x to 2.33.x? It may be a MIPS thing, as my >>> x86_64 >>> box shows no discernible change in build times between the same >>> versions. >>> Can any other archs check w/ genlop to see if they see a large jump >>> in build >>> time? >>> >>> 'genlop -t util-linux' output on my SGI system (some entries >>> removed >>> for >>> brevity): >>> >>> Thu Feb 1 11:26:33 2018 >>> sys-apps/util-linux-2.31.1 >>>merge time: 27 minutes and 48 seconds. >>> >>> Sat Mar 31 08:07:20 2018 >>> sys-apps/util-linux-2.32 >>>merge time: 28 minutes and 44 seconds. >>> >>> Mon Aug 27 06:21:30 2018 >>> sys-apps/util-linux-2.32.1 >>>merge time: 32 minutes and 58 seconds. >>> >>> Tue Nov 13 10:03:58 2018 >>> sys-apps/util-linux-2.33 >>>merge time: 1 hour, 19 minutes and 49 seconds. >>> >>> Fri Jan 11 09:20:21 2019 >>> sys-apps/util-linux-2.33.1 >>>merge time: 1 hour, 23 minutes and 37 seconds. >>> >>> Thu Feb 21 04:14:33 2019 >>> sys-apps/util-linux-2.33.1 >>>merge time: 1 hour, 25 minutes and 15 seconds. >>> >> >> 2.33 was changed to use python-r1 eclass instead of python-single-r1 >> eclass. And the increase of build time seems caused by an out-of- >> source >> build for each python implementation. Some libraries are built >> several >> times (for native abi + for each python implementation). > > And there is additional configure run for each python implementation. Hmm, this might explain things, somewhat. I think there's possibly some truth to the getcwd bit discussed earlier, but that may be limited to glibc only. util-linux-2.33.1 on my uclibc-ng chroot took about ~25mins. Have to re-time the glibc build to see if it's something w/ the libc implementation. Temp workaround I guess is to cut down on the PYTHON_TARGETS before my next catalyst attempt. 2.7 + 3.7 should be enough... -- Joshua Kinard Gentoo/MIPS ku...@gentoo.org rsa6144/5C63F4E3F5C6C943 2015-04-27 177C 1972 1FB8 F254 BAD0 3E72 5C63 F4E3 F5C6 C943 "The past tempts us, the present confuses us, the future frightens us. And our lives slip away, moment by moment, lost in that vast, terrible in-between." --Emperor Turhan, Centauri Republic
Re: [gentoo-dev] util-linux build time increase?
В Пн, 25/02/2019 в 13:07 +0300, Alexander Tsoy пишет: > В Чт, 21/02/2019 в 04:36 -0500, Joshua Kinard пишет: > > Does anyone have an idea why util-linux's build time would go up > > significantly from 2.32.x to 2.33.x? It may be a MIPS thing, as my > > x86_64 > > box shows no discernible change in build times between the same > > versions. > > Can any other archs check w/ genlop to see if they see a large jump > > in build > > time? > > > > 'genlop -t util-linux' output on my SGI system (some entries > > removed > > for > > brevity): > > > > Thu Feb 1 11:26:33 2018 >>> sys-apps/util-linux-2.31.1 > >merge time: 27 minutes and 48 seconds. > > > > Sat Mar 31 08:07:20 2018 >>> sys-apps/util-linux-2.32 > >merge time: 28 minutes and 44 seconds. > > > > Mon Aug 27 06:21:30 2018 >>> sys-apps/util-linux-2.32.1 > >merge time: 32 minutes and 58 seconds. > > > > Tue Nov 13 10:03:58 2018 >>> sys-apps/util-linux-2.33 > >merge time: 1 hour, 19 minutes and 49 seconds. > > > > Fri Jan 11 09:20:21 2019 >>> sys-apps/util-linux-2.33.1 > >merge time: 1 hour, 23 minutes and 37 seconds. > > > > Thu Feb 21 04:14:33 2019 >>> sys-apps/util-linux-2.33.1 > >merge time: 1 hour, 25 minutes and 15 seconds. > > > > 2.33 was changed to use python-r1 eclass instead of python-single-r1 > eclass. And the increase of build time seems caused by an out-of- > source > build for each python implementation. Some libraries are built > several > times (for native abi + for each python implementation). And there is additional configure run for each python implementation.
Re: [gentoo-dev] util-linux build time increase?
В Чт, 21/02/2019 в 04:36 -0500, Joshua Kinard пишет: > Does anyone have an idea why util-linux's build time would go up > significantly from 2.32.x to 2.33.x? It may be a MIPS thing, as my > x86_64 > box shows no discernible change in build times between the same > versions. > Can any other archs check w/ genlop to see if they see a large jump > in build > time? > > 'genlop -t util-linux' output on my SGI system (some entries removed > for > brevity): > > Thu Feb 1 11:26:33 2018 >>> sys-apps/util-linux-2.31.1 >merge time: 27 minutes and 48 seconds. > > Sat Mar 31 08:07:20 2018 >>> sys-apps/util-linux-2.32 >merge time: 28 minutes and 44 seconds. > > Mon Aug 27 06:21:30 2018 >>> sys-apps/util-linux-2.32.1 >merge time: 32 minutes and 58 seconds. > > Tue Nov 13 10:03:58 2018 >>> sys-apps/util-linux-2.33 >merge time: 1 hour, 19 minutes and 49 seconds. > > Fri Jan 11 09:20:21 2019 >>> sys-apps/util-linux-2.33.1 >merge time: 1 hour, 23 minutes and 37 seconds. > > Thu Feb 21 04:14:33 2019 >>> sys-apps/util-linux-2.33.1 >merge time: 1 hour, 25 minutes and 15 seconds. > 2.33 was changed to use python-r1 eclass instead of python-single-r1 eclass. And the increase of build time seems caused by an out-of-source build for each python implementation. Some libraries are built several times (for native abi + for each python implementation).
Re: [gentoo-dev] util-linux build time increase?
Hi! On Thu, 21 Feb 2019, Georgy Yakovlev wrote: > On Thursday, February 21, 2019 1:36:24 AM PST Joshua Kinard wrote: > > Does anyone have an idea why util-linux's build time would go up > > significantly from 2.32.x to 2.33.x? It may be a MIPS thing, as my x86_64 > > box shows no discernible change in build times between the same versions. > > Can any other archs check w/ genlop to see if they see a large jump in build > > time? > > > > This may be related to this bug: > https://bugs.gentoo.org/447970 > > I have packages ( cpio and tar for example) that take hours to emerge on arm > boards with FEATURES=sandbox, and couple of minutes without. > ./configure getcwd test takes unreasonably long time under sandbox. > > don't have util-linux statistics to show. See https://bugs.gentoo.org/447970#c18 for an ugly, ugly hack to prevent the wait time. Regards, Tobias
Re: [gentoo-dev] util-linux build time increase?
On 2/21/19 1:29 PM, Guilherme Amadio wrote: > On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 04:36:24AM -0500, Joshua Kinard wrote: >> Does anyone have an idea why util-linux's build time would go up >> significantly from 2.32.x to 2.33.x? It may be a MIPS thing, as my x86_64 >> box shows no discernible change in build times between the same versions. >> Can any other archs check w/ genlop to see if they see a large jump in build >> time? >> At least on a couple of my amd64 there isn't any noticeable slowdown. similar to your own observations. E.g this laptop (Linux ares 4.9.155-gentoo-kf0 #1 SMP Sun Feb 10 17:01:51 CET 2019 x86_64 Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1535M v5 @ 2.90GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux) says # /usr/local/bin/emerge_time.sh sys-apps/util-linux util-linux-2.28.2: Thu Feb 9 18:52:32 2017: 1 minute, 9 seconds util-linux-2.28.2: Thu Feb 9 19:56:31 2017: 1 minute, 37 seconds util-linux-2.28.2: Fri Apr 21 20:05:52 2017: 35 seconds util-linux-2.30.2: Thu Nov 23 18:59:23 2017: 55 seconds util-linux-2.30.2: Mon Dec 4 22:08:07 2017: 38 seconds util-linux-2.30.2: Wed Jan 10 20:44:39 2018: 44 seconds util-linux-2.30.2-r1: Mon Mar 12 19:20:06 2018: 46 seconds util-linux-2.32-r4: Sun Jul 15 15:51:21 2018: 50 seconds util-linux-2.33-r1: Sun Jan 6 20:53:29 2019: 46 seconds util-linux-2.33-r1: Thu Feb 21 22:16:25 2019: 53 seconds -- Kristian Fiskerstrand OpenPGP keyblock reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] util-linux build time increase?
On Thursday, February 21, 2019 1:36:24 AM PST Joshua Kinard wrote: > Does anyone have an idea why util-linux's build time would go up > significantly from 2.32.x to 2.33.x? It may be a MIPS thing, as my x86_64 > box shows no discernible change in build times between the same versions. > Can any other archs check w/ genlop to see if they see a large jump in build > time? > This may be related to this bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/447970 I have packages ( cpio and tar for example) that take hours to emerge on arm boards with FEATURES=sandbox, and couple of minutes without. ./configure getcwd test takes unreasonably long time under sandbox. don't have util-linux statistics to show. -- Georgy Yakovlev Gentoo Linux Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-dev] util-linux build time increase?
On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 04:36:24AM -0500, Joshua Kinard wrote: > Does anyone have an idea why util-linux's build time would go up > significantly from 2.32.x to 2.33.x? It may be a MIPS thing, as my x86_64 > box shows no discernible change in build times between the same versions. > Can any other archs check w/ genlop to see if they see a large jump in build > time? > > 'genlop -t util-linux' output on my SGI system (some entries removed for > brevity): > > Thu Feb 1 11:26:33 2018 >>> sys-apps/util-linux-2.31.1 >merge time: 27 minutes and 48 seconds. > > Sat Mar 31 08:07:20 2018 >>> sys-apps/util-linux-2.32 >merge time: 28 minutes and 44 seconds. > > Mon Aug 27 06:21:30 2018 >>> sys-apps/util-linux-2.32.1 >merge time: 32 minutes and 58 seconds. > > Tue Nov 13 10:03:58 2018 >>> sys-apps/util-linux-2.33 >merge time: 1 hour, 19 minutes and 49 seconds. > > Fri Jan 11 09:20:21 2019 >>> sys-apps/util-linux-2.33.1 >merge time: 1 hour, 23 minutes and 37 seconds. > > Thu Feb 21 04:14:33 2019 >>> sys-apps/util-linux-2.33.1 >merge time: 1 hour, 25 minutes and 15 seconds. Indeed. Here's what I see in one of my machines at work (Core i7-7820X): Fri Jul 20 16:31:38 2018 >>> sys-apps/util-linux-2.32.1 merge time: 1 minute and 40 seconds. Fri Aug 3 14:38:40 2018 >>> sys-apps/util-linux-2.32.1 merge time: 1 minute and 40 seconds. Wed Nov 14 16:49:40 2018 >>> sys-apps/util-linux-2.33 merge time: 4 minutes and 24 seconds. Tue Feb 5 14:21:40 2019 >>> sys-apps/util-linux-2.33.1 merge time: 4 minutes and 24 seconds. Not sure what causes it. Cheers, -Guilherme
[gentoo-dev] util-linux build time increase?
Does anyone have an idea why util-linux's build time would go up significantly from 2.32.x to 2.33.x? It may be a MIPS thing, as my x86_64 box shows no discernible change in build times between the same versions. Can any other archs check w/ genlop to see if they see a large jump in build time? 'genlop -t util-linux' output on my SGI system (some entries removed for brevity): Thu Feb 1 11:26:33 2018 >>> sys-apps/util-linux-2.31.1 merge time: 27 minutes and 48 seconds. Sat Mar 31 08:07:20 2018 >>> sys-apps/util-linux-2.32 merge time: 28 minutes and 44 seconds. Mon Aug 27 06:21:30 2018 >>> sys-apps/util-linux-2.32.1 merge time: 32 minutes and 58 seconds. Tue Nov 13 10:03:58 2018 >>> sys-apps/util-linux-2.33 merge time: 1 hour, 19 minutes and 49 seconds. Fri Jan 11 09:20:21 2019 >>> sys-apps/util-linux-2.33.1 merge time: 1 hour, 23 minutes and 37 seconds. Thu Feb 21 04:14:33 2019 >>> sys-apps/util-linux-2.33.1 merge time: 1 hour, 25 minutes and 15 seconds. -- Joshua Kinard Gentoo/MIPS ku...@gentoo.org rsa6144/5C63F4E3F5C6C943 2015-04-27 177C 1972 1FB8 F254 BAD0 3E72 5C63 F4E3 F5C6 C943 "The past tempts us, the present confuses us, the future frightens us. And our lives slip away, moment by moment, lost in that vast, terrible in-between." --Emperor Turhan, Centauri Republic
