I believe something needs to be done with the zlib-1.2.5.1-r1 and -r2
packages currently in the tree. The maintainer of zlib pushed those
revisions with a patch that alters macro identifiers, making Gentoo's
zlib incompatible with upstream. As a result, a lot of packages stopped
building.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 09/23/2011 10:44 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
I believe something needs to be done with the zlib-1.2.5.1-r1 and
-r2 packages currently in the tree. The maintainer of zlib pushed
those revisions with a patch that alters macro identifiers,
It's a mess right now and it just doesn't look right. The bug that
deals with it was locked from public view:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=383179
Is there any good reason why this bug is dev-only? Going over the contents I
dont see any.
(And we've been bickering in far worse
On Freitag 23 September 2011 23:54:09 Markos Chandras wrote:
Why are you discussing this in the -dev ML since there is already an
open bug about this? This is clearly a problem(if any) with the zlib
packages + maintainer. We ( as individual devs ) can't do much. If you
want to push this
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 3:48 AM, Andreas K. Huettel
dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote:
Because he cannot do this; the bug is dev-only now and Mike un-cc'ed him after
setting the group restriction.
That's not a very nice thing to do.
However, Nikos didn't behave nicely either, so I don't quite blame
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 09/23/2011 11:18 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
On Freitag 23 September 2011 23:54:09 Markos Chandras wrote:
Why are you discussing this in the -dev ML since there is already
an open bug about this? This is clearly a problem(if any) with the
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 5:44 PM, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@arcor.de wrote:
I believe something needs to be done with the zlib-1.2.5.1-r1 and -r2
packages currently in the tree. The maintainer of zlib pushed those
revisions with a patch that alters macro identifiers, making Gentoo's zlib
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Nirbheek Chauhan nirbh...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 3:48 AM, Andreas K. Huettel
dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote:
Because he cannot do this; the bug is dev-only now and Mike un-cc'ed him
after
setting the group restriction.
That's not a very nice
On Friday, September 23, 2011 19:30:15 Alec Warner wrote:
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 3:48 AM, Andreas K. Huettel
dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote:
Because he cannot do this; the bug is dev-only now and Mike un-cc'ed him
after setting the
On Friday, September 23, 2011 18:02:50 Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
It's a mess right now and it just doesn't look right. The bug that
deals with it was locked from public view:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=383179
Is there any good reason why this bug is dev-only? Going
On Friday, September 23, 2011 17:44:50 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
I believe something needs to be done with the zlib-1.2.5.1-r1 and -r2
packages currently in the tree. The maintainer of zlib pushed those
revisions with a patch that alters macro identifiers, making Gentoo's
zlib incompatible
11 matches
Mail list logo
