On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 10:09:01 +
Francesco Riosa wrote:
> What's changed from 2006 in version handling?
The ordering rules, the handling of zeroes and the behaviour of
suffixes.
--
Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
What's changed from 2006 in version handling?
Il giorno 28/apr/2012 11:39, "Ciaran McCreesh" <
ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com> ha scritto:
>
> On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 10:52:07 +0200
> Michał Górny wrote:
> > On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 21:12:27 +0100
> > Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > > * Get a versionator repla
On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 10:52:07 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 21:12:27 +0100
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > * Get a versionator replacement into the PM
>
> Why are we trying to make PM a brick instead of keeping stuff modular?
> What does the eclass lack which could be provided by P
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 21:12:27 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> * Get a versionator replacement into the PM
Why are we trying to make PM a brick instead of keeping stuff modular?
What does the eclass lack which could be provided by PM?
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP
El vie, 27-04-2012 a las 21:12 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh escribió:
> On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 21:58:24 +0200
> Michał Górny wrote:
> > Of course, if we take the 'quick EAPI 5 route', it won't include
> > anything useful. In the meantime, do we have a complete list of
> > candidates for EAPI 5?
>
> Let's
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 21:58:24 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> Of course, if we take the 'quick EAPI 5 route', it won't include
> anything useful. In the meantime, do we have a complete list of
> candidates for EAPI 5?
Let's continue this on the PMS list.
* user patches
* EAPI parsing
* the things t
