Re: Implicit use of versionator.eclass in ebuilds and eclasses (was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: eclass/)

2018-05-18 Thread M. J. Everitt
On 19/05/18 01:01, Andreas Sturmlechner wrote: > On Freitag, 18. Mai 2018 23:53:06 CEST Michał Górny wrote: >> One of the reasons we do mailing list reviews of widely used eclasses is >> to let people tell you that you've left 'version_is_at_least' here. > I see the error of my ways. > >

Implicit use of versionator.eclass in ebuilds and eclasses (was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: eclass/)

2018-05-18 Thread Andreas Sturmlechner
On Freitag, 18. Mai 2018 23:53:06 CEST Michał Górny wrote: > One of the reasons we do mailing list reviews of widely used eclasses is > to let people tell you that you've left 'version_is_at_least' here. I see the error of my ways. Meanwhile, here's a list of packages implicitly using