Re: Pass "${@}" in phase functions Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] Introduce cmake-multilib wrapper for cmake-utils.

2013-04-13 Thread Michael Weber
On 04/13/2013 05:50 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > That's my mistake most likely. Please commit the patch. done. + 13 Apr 2013; Michael Weber cmake-multilib.eclass: + Pass ${@} in phase functions. Approved by author on dev-ml. + -- Michael Weber Gentoo Developer web: https://xmw.de/ mailto: Micha

Re: Pass "${@}" in phase functions Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] Introduce cmake-multilib wrapper for cmake-utils.

2013-04-13 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sat, 13 Apr 2013 03:04:51 +0200 Michael Weber wrote: > I'm not sure if it's a sane way to push make -j1 via > > src_compile() { > cmake-multilib_src_compile -j1 > } Well the Council doesn't approve of it for default phase functions... -- Ciaran McCreesh signature.asc Description: PGP

Re: Pass "${@}" in phase functions Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] Introduce cmake-multilib wrapper for cmake-utils.

2013-04-13 Thread Michał Górny
On Sat, 13 Apr 2013 03:04:51 +0200 Michael Weber wrote: > Hi, > > I'm not sure if it's a sane way to push make -j1 via > > src_compile() { > cmake-multilib_src_compile -j1 > } > > but I detected a lack of functionality in the current > cmake-multilib.eclass. Both cmake-utils.eclass and mul

Pass "${@}" in phase functions Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] Introduce cmake-multilib wrapper for cmake-utils.

2013-04-12 Thread Michael Weber
Hi, I'm not sure if it's a sane way to push make -j1 via src_compile() { cmake-multilib_src_compile -j1 } but I detected a lack of functionality in the current cmake-multilib.eclass. Both cmake-utils.eclass and multilib-build.eclass have it, so it might be sound to continue with this behavio