Re: Questions about proxy-maint (Re: [gentoo-dev] Attracting developers)

2012-12-26 Thread Markos Chandras
On 26 December 2012 20:43, Kent Fredric wrote: > On 27 December 2012 05:39, Kent Fredric wrote: >> It could actually be just the Proxy Maintainer workflow is not clear enough, >> or simple enough, and that we need more push towards a more heavy >> proxy-maintainer based system ( I don't know, I'm

Questions about proxy-maint (Re: [gentoo-dev] Attracting developers)

2012-12-26 Thread Kent Fredric
On 27 December 2012 05:39, Kent Fredric wrote: > It could actually be just the Proxy Maintainer workflow is not clear enough, > or simple enough, and that we need more push towards a more heavy > proxy-maintainer based system ( I don't know, I'm ignorant to too much of > proxy-maintainer-ship stuf