Re: [gentoo-dev] metadata.xml unherd/-ization, v2

2014-12-20 Thread Tom Wijsman
On Tue, 9 Dec 2014 16:23:57 +0100 Jeroen Roovers j...@gentoo.org wrote: On Tue, 9 Dec 2014 12:59:26 +0100 Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote: On Tue, 9 Dec 2014, Michał Górny wrote: As for the exact details, I've pretty much decided to go for featurism here, IOW making everyone

Re: [gentoo-dev] metadata.xml unherd/-ization, v2

2014-12-20 Thread Peter Stuge
Rich Freeman wrote: How about contact instead of team. there is no meaning to a contact besides being CC'ed on bugs. Please simply call it cc then? :) //Peter

Re: [gentoo-dev] metadata.xml unherd/-ization, v2

2014-12-12 Thread Aaron W. Swenson
On 2014-12-10 10:41, Sergey Popov wrote: 09.12.2014 14:59, Ulrich Mueller пишет: proxy-maintainer is very confusing because you won't put the proxy maintainer there, but the user who is being proxied. Please rename to something like proxied (assuming that this exists as a word in English)

Re: [gentoo-dev] metadata.xml unherd/-ization, v2

2014-12-10 Thread Ulrich Mueller
On Tue, 9 Dec 2014, Rich Freeman wrote: I thought we were generally agreed we wanted to get rid of herds. The goal wasn't to rename them, but to get rid of them. We could have email aliases for bugs so that people can sign up for notifications, but they would NOT be considered maintainers.

Re: [gentoo-dev] metadata.xml unherd/-ization, v2

2014-12-10 Thread Luca Barbato
On 09/12/14 17:34, Michał Górny wrote: I'm all for keeping it simple. However, backwards compatibility makes it hard to keep things simple. I'd love to do, say, metadata.yml supporting stuff like: - maintainer: f...@gentoo.org, b...@gentoo.org - maintainer: - name: Foo Bar email:

Re: [gentoo-dev] metadata.xml unherd/-ization, v2

2014-12-10 Thread Sergey Popov
09.12.2014 14:59, Ulrich Mueller пишет: proxy-maintainer is very confusing because you won't put the proxy maintainer there, but the user who is being proxied. Please rename to something like proxied (assuming that this exists as a word in English) or by-proxy. +1 for that. Proxy maintainer

Re: [gentoo-dev] metadata.xml unherd/-ization, v2

2014-12-10 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2014-12-09, o godz. 00:46:28 Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org napisał(a): So considering the previous thread, the Council and QA discussions, I have prepared a new version of the metadata.xml update. To hopefully make everyone happy, I come with this three-step process: And the Council

Re: [gentoo-dev] metadata.xml unherd/-ization, v2

2014-12-10 Thread Rich Freeman
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 2:06 AM, Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote: On Tue, 9 Dec 2014, Rich Freeman wrote: I thought we were generally agreed we wanted to get rid of herds. The goal wasn't to rename them, but to get rid of them. We could have email aliases for bugs so that people can

Re: [gentoo-dev] metadata.xml unherd/-ization, v2

2014-12-10 Thread Rich Freeman
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: Dnia 2014-12-09, o godz. 12:59:26 Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org napisał(a): As the previously stated goal was to get rid of herds, I don't understand why you want to reintroduce them as a value of the type attribute.

Re: [gentoo-dev] metadata.xml unherd/-ization, v2

2014-12-09 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2014-12-09, o godz. 00:46:28 Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org napisał(a): Hello, all. So considering the previous thread, the Council and QA discussions, I have prepared a new version of the metadata.xml update. To hopefully make everyone happy, I come with this three-step process: 1.

Re: [gentoo-dev] metadata.xml unherd/-ization, v2

2014-12-09 Thread Ulrich Mueller
On Tue, 9 Dec 2014, Michał Górny wrote: As for the exact details, I've pretty much decided to go for featurism here, IOW making everyone happy. It also proves how absurd typing maintainers is but if you really feel like having it, sure. The default is 'developer', herd/ tags would be

Re: [gentoo-dev] metadata.xml unherd/-ization, v2

2014-12-09 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Tue, 9 Dec 2014 12:59:26 +0100 Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote: On Tue, 9 Dec 2014, Michał Górny wrote: As for the exact details, I've pretty much decided to go for featurism here, IOW making everyone happy. It also proves how absurd typing maintainers is but if you really feel

Re: [gentoo-dev] metadata.xml unherd/-ization, v2

2014-12-09 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
Am Dienstag 09 Dezember 2014, 00:46:28 schrieb Michał Górny: 2. Convert herd/ to maintainer type=herd/, Could any person type=developer/ please explain to me why this additional xmlfication is of any improvement type=nonzero/? As far as I know the typical way to edit metadata.xml files for all

Re: [gentoo-dev] metadata.xml unherd/-ization, v2

2014-12-09 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2014-12-09, o godz. 16:49:24 Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org napisał(a): Am Dienstag 09 Dezember 2014, 00:46:28 schrieb Michał Górny: 2. Convert herd/ to maintainer type=herd/, Could any person type=developer/ please explain to me why this additional xmlfication is of any

Re: [gentoo-dev] metadata.xml unherd/-ization, v2

2014-12-09 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2014-12-09, o godz. 12:59:26 Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org napisał(a): On Tue, 9 Dec 2014, Michał Górny wrote: As for the exact details, I've pretty much decided to go for featurism here, IOW making everyone happy. It also proves how absurd typing maintainers is but if you really

Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] metadata.xml unherd/-ization, v2

2014-12-09 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
As far as I know the typical way to edit metadata.xml files for all of us is still by hand in a text editor, and I prefer a lot typing herdkde/herd over maintainer type=herdkde/maintainer maintainer type=herd emailk...@gentoo.org/email nameLovely KDE herd/name

Re: [gentoo-dev] metadata.xml unherd/-ization, v2

2014-12-09 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2014-12-09, o godz. 17:17:35 Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org napisał(a): As far as I know the typical way to edit metadata.xml files for all of us is still by hand in a text editor, and I prefer a lot typing herdkde/herd over maintainer

Re: [gentoo-dev] metadata.xml unherd/-ization, v2

2014-12-09 Thread Ulrich Mueller
On Tue, 9 Dec 2014, Michał Górny wrote: That is *precisely the goal* of this. We scratch herd/ and project/, and just use well-supported maintainer/ tag. type= is entirely optional, unobtrusive and backwards-compatible with existing apps. And yes, with just maintainer/ tag the rule in bug

Re: [gentoo-dev] metadata.xml unherd/-ization, v2

2014-12-09 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2014-12-09, o godz. 18:59:22 Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org napisał(a): On Tue, 9 Dec 2014, Michał Górny wrote: That is *precisely the goal* of this. We scratch herd/ and project/, and just use well-supported maintainer/ tag. type= is entirely optional, unobtrusive and

Re: [gentoo-dev] metadata.xml unherd/-ization, v2

2014-12-09 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2014-12-09, o godz. 10:15:09 Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org napisał(a): Dnia 2014-12-09, o godz. 00:46:28 Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org napisał(a): Hello, all. So considering the previous thread, the Council and QA discussions, I have prepared a new version of the metadata.xml