Re[2]: [gentoo-dev] Decision to remove stage1/2 from installation documentation

2005-11-22 Thread Jakub Moc
22.11.2005, 17:30:50, Chris Gianelloni wrote: On Tue, 2005-11-22 at 09:54 -0600, Lance Albertson wrote: Also, the problem is not so much needing manpower for testing as far as Release Engineering is concerned. It is instead having some method in place where devs actually perform QA on

Re[2]: [gentoo-dev] Decision to remove stage1/2 from installation documentation

2005-11-22 Thread Jakub Moc
22.11.2005, 19:03:49, Grant Goodyear wrote: I keep hearing this, isn't there a real difference between a stage 1 and a stage 3 install inasmuch as somebody who needs (or wants) to dramatically tailor what's in the system profile can choose to do so from a stage 1 or 2, but would have to

Re[2]: [gentoo-dev] Decision to remove stage1/2 from installation documentation

2005-11-22 Thread Jakub Moc
22.11.2005, 20:57:15, Chris Gianelloni wrote: The idea was to move out the stage1/stage2 docs to somewhere else. Then create some sort of Advanced Installation Topics guide or something, to list out the replacement procedures for customizing a system from a stage3 tarball, then, eventually,

Re: Re[2]: [gentoo-dev] Decision to remove stage1/2 from installation documentation

2005-11-22 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Tue, 2005-11-22 at 21:16 +0100, Jakub Moc wrote: 22.11.2005, 20:57:15, Chris Gianelloni wrote: The idea was to move out the stage1/stage2 docs to somewhere else. Then create some sort of Advanced Installation Topics guide or something, to list out the replacement procedures for