On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 15:31:57 -0700
Greg Turner wrote:
> Anyhow, isn't the gentoo-x86 tree already plenty big enough, without
> every single overlay's ebuilds and eclasses in there too? Personally,
> I'm inclined to wish it was smaller, even if that meant more stuff was
> pushed into overlays
Ac
On 06/12/2013 06:31 PM, Greg Turner wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Michael Orlitzky
> wrote:
>> On 06/12/2013 01:13 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>>> On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 19:05:29 +0200 hasufell
>>> wrote:
> Isn't it more an indication that Gentoo needs better package
> managemen
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 06/12/2013 01:13 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>> On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 19:05:29 +0200 hasufell
>> wrote:
Isn't it more an indication that Gentoo needs better package
management support for overlays?
>>
>>> No.
>>
>
> We need wor
