The latest:
I downloaded the subversion-1.1.4 source from tigris.org and did a
standard ./configure ; make ; make install. (It picked up my
installed db-4.1.25_p1-r4.) As long as I only use the binaries I
compiled svnadmin verify and svnlook work fine. If I use the Gentoo
subversion-1.1.4
* Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] [05/05/09 02:46 -0400]:
please report back to me with your arch/gcc/cflags/openssh info and whether
it
worked !
I had to switch to openssl-0.9.7g two weeks back due to
problems with cert-signing in a special case. No problems
so far on ppc32.
gcc version
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marius Mauch wrote:
Danny van Dyk wrote:
* profile:
List and switch Gentoo portage profiles. Check if selected
profile is valid in regard to used ARCH.
Hmm, have to check this out and see if I can obsolete my own little hack
for
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 03:46:57AM +0300, Marius Mauch wrote:
Brian Harring wrote:
Clarify please :)
Offhand, I don't see why a bin repo for a home target isn't viable,
along with a vdb repo in the same location. It's a bit trickier, but
I suspect it might be a bit more flexible in the
On Sun, 2005-05-08 at 19:53 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
app-mobile sounds good to me ... then just use metadata.xml to include a
'fuller' description :P
Please don't use app-mobile as it may be confused with mobile computing,
not mobile phones.
Any reason why these packages can not go into
On Thu, 2005-05-05 at 23:41 -0400, Aaron Walker wrote:
There are a sleu of C++-only libs in dev-libs that IMO belong in dev-cpp:
I know it's a bit late for this, but I'm slowly catching up on my unread
emails:
dev-cpp sounds like stuff releated to a C pre-processor? Can't
categories contain the
On Monday 09 May 2005 08:35 am, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
On Thu, 2005-05-05 at 23:41 -0400, Aaron Walker wrote:
There are a sleu of C++-only libs in dev-libs that IMO belong in dev-cpp:
dev-cpp sounds like stuff releated to a C pre-processor? Can't
categories contain the '+' char? e.g
Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
On Sun, 2005-05-08 at 19:53 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
app-mobile sounds good to me ... then just use metadata.xml to include a
'fuller' description :P
Please don't use app-mobile as it may be confused with mobile computing,
not mobile phones.
Any reason
On Mon, 2005-05-09 at 16:21 +0300, Alin Nastac wrote:
Please explain what do you understand as mobile computing. You keep
using this term.
From what I see in herds.xml, mobile == Wireless (802.11a/b/g,
bluetooth, etc) related items
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobile_computing
Mobile phones
On Mon, 2005-05-09 at 17:01 +0300, Alin Nastac wrote:
Then it is true... mobile phone stuff classifies as mobile computing. It
should be your playground, not mine.
PDAs also classify as mobile computing, yet the mobile herd doesn't
handle PDA related applications either - as you saw from the
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 05:01:41PM +0300, Alin Nastac wrote:
Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
On Mon, 2005-05-09 at 16:21 +0300, Alin Nastac wrote:
Please explain what do you understand as mobile computing. You keep
using this term.
From what I see in herds.xml, mobile == Wireless
On Sat, 2005-05-07 at 22:32 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are there any plans for supporting ebuilds for windows apps which use
wine? I just installed wine (via the ebuild) to enable DVDShrink to
be installed. Worked like a charm, but it would have been much cooler
to 'emerge dvdshrink'
Georgi Georgiev wrote: [Sun May 08 2005, 08:19:20PM EDT]
Would it be inappropriate to start bitching (again) about a flat
tree where each package can go in multiple categories?
That's something I'd love to see eventually... I mean the flat tree,
not the complaining ;-)
Regards,
Aron
--
Aron
On 2005-05-09, Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 09 May 2005 08:35 am, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
On Thu, 2005-05-05 at 23:41 -0400, Aaron Walker wrote:
There are a sleu of C++-only libs in dev-libs that IMO belong in dev-cpp:
dev-cpp sounds like stuff releated to a C
On Monday 09 May 2005 02:23 pm, Phil Richards wrote:
On 2005-05-09, Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 09 May 2005 08:35 am, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
On Thu, 2005-05-05 at 23:41 -0400, Aaron Walker wrote:
There are a sleu of C++-only libs in dev-libs that IMO belong in
* On Mon May-09-2005 at 03:34:36 PM +0200, Henrik Brix Andersen said:
On Mon, 2005-05-09 at 16:21 +0300, Alin Nastac wrote:
[...]
Mobile phones are far from PDAs. I don't see anything you can't do with
a PDA (since it _is_ a computer).
Compared to them, _normal_ mobile phones are very
On Tuesday 03 May 2005 23:05, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 14:49 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday 03 May 2005 12:10 pm, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
I think an easier solution would be a portage rescue set of profiles.
afaik the only thing it'd need is a
On Monday 09 May 2005 04:12 pm, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
What about adding a panic mode to portage which, when confronted with a
missing profile, (and after confirmation) continues to upgrade portage to
the latest version it can find with some default settings that should
allways work.
looking
On Thursday 05 May 2005 03:28, Michiel de Bruijne wrote:
On Thursday 05 May 2005 01:14, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
For us to support LSB:
* We'd have to use RPM instead of portage
That's not correct, quote from LSB:
The distribution itself may use a different packaging format for its own
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 10:12:03PM +0200, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
What about adding a panic mode to portage which, when confronted with a
missing profile, (and after confirmation) continues to upgrade portage to the
latest version it can find with some default settings that should allways
Kevin wrote:
snip
Does anyone have any thoughts to share on:
a) general advisability of this (seems like a good thing to me---lots of
savings on space across machines, oafs has a good authentication system in
kerberos, seems better to me than running a local rsync server alone and also
Unless someone steps up, the intel compiler toolchain
packages dev-lang/icc (intel cc) and dev-lang/ifc (intel fortran
compiler) are prime candidates for removal from the tree; open bugs,
primary maintainer is retired, and no devs have moved in to pick up the
packages, let along touched the
22 matches
Mail list logo
