Hi,
This is an automatically created email message.
http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 14377 ebuilds.
The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds.
The tests are:
* if a version has been masked for 30 days or more.
* if an arch was in
gtranscode should have been a transcode frontend in GTK2, but it does not work
the way it is in portage, it's unmaintained both upstream and in Gentoo
(kzimmerm seems to be MIA), and the new versions of transcode changed the CLI
so it wouldn't work on transcode 1.
I'm going to mask it today
Is vendors.gentoo.org going to have the new redesign that curtis119 is
implementating? It seems that it is on a different server and vhost and
is maintained by someone other than Ian! now.
Does it have a future under the Gentoo umbrella?
George
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 04:40:28PM + or thereabouts, George Prowse wrote:
Is vendors.gentoo.org going to have the new redesign that curtis119 is
implementating?
The eventual plan is for all web sites residing under the *.gentoo.org
domain to have the new look and feel.
--kurt
Hi,
I often use my http://dev.gentoo.org/~brix/ web space for sharing
patches and other bits of information with upstream projects. This
URL, however, is rather unintuitive and apparently difficult for
upstream devs to remember - not to mention that it also looks a bit
unprofessional.
I've
On Mon, 2005-12-05 at 18:39 +0100, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
Hi,
I often use my http://dev.gentoo.org/~brix/ web space for sharing
patches and other bits of information with upstream projects. This
URL, however, is rather unintuitive and apparently difficult for
upstream devs to remember
Hey all,
Sorry for asking on this list but if anyone has an MP2400+ which they
are willing to get rid of (I can pay PP and a reasonable asking price)
on the cheap, please let me know.
Please email me off-list on this mail if you can help me.
It will certainly help me out a LOT!
Many thanks,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi everyone,
With 7.0rc3 that's been entering the tree last weekend, there was an ABI
change in libdrm and subsequent bump from .so.1 to .so.2.
This means you'll need to run revdep-rebuild after upgrading, otherwise
you'll get problems from 3D just
On Mon, 2005-12-05 at 11:36 -0800, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi everyone,
With 7.0rc3 that's been entering the tree last weekend, there was an ABI
change in libdrm and subsequent bump from .so.1 to .so.2.
This means you'll need to run
Another package leaving the tree, again because of transcode1 CLI changes.
It does not work as intended with transcode 1.0 and has other problems, too.
Hoping in newer versions to come out better, I'm going to mask and it's
pending removal one week from now.
--
Diego Flameeyes Pettenò -
Kurt Lieber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 04:40:28PM + or thereabouts, George Prowse
wrote:
Is vendors.gentoo.org going to have the new redesign that curtis119
is implementating?
The eventual plan is for all web sites residing under the *.gentoo.org
domain to have
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 04:24:37PM -0800, Drake Wyrm wrote:
Kurt Lieber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 04:40:28PM + or thereabouts, George Prowse
wrote:
Is vendors.gentoo.org going to have the new redesign that curtis119
is implementating?
The eventual plan
To all,
This is just an 7-8 hour warning for the coming downtime of
bugs.gentoo.org for upgrade. I plan to upgrade bugzilla the morning
(EDT) of December 7th. I plan on alotting 30 minutes for the upgrade,
although those in the past who have suffered through my upgrades, know
they have gone much
On Thursday 01 December 2005 22:28, Jason Stubbs wrote:
On Monday 28 November 2005 03:49, Marius Mauch wrote:
Jason Stubbs wrote:
On Sunday 27 November 2005 00:09, Marius Mauch wrote:
Jason Stubbs wrote:
Well, the vote was more for the SHA1 change actually as that's the one
triggering
On Tuesday 06 December 2005 00:21, Alec Warner wrote:
Jason Stubbs wrote:
Okay, new suggestion.
Postpone the cache rewrite from above. Have only the minimal mods
necessary to fix the PORT_LOGDIR/tee bug. Include the other two as is.
That would be 2.0.54 as per the attached patch. Get
On Mon, 2005-12-05 at 23:06 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
Okay, new suggestion.
Postpone the cache rewrite from above. Have only the minimal mods necessary
to
fix the PORT_LOGDIR/tee bug. Include the other two as is. That would be
2.0.54 as per the attached patch. Get that out soon and get
Ned Ludd wrote:
On Mon, 2005-12-05 at 23:06 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
Okay, new suggestion.
Postpone the cache rewrite from above. Have only the minimal mods necessary to
fix the PORT_LOGDIR/tee bug. Include the other two as is. That would be
2.0.54 as per the attached patch. Get that out
17 matches
Mail list logo
