On Thursday 09 March 2006 04:12, Mike Frysinger wrote:
this is kind of a pita in terms of maintenance and imo a hack ... why not
just have the splitelf code skip stripped binaries
Because of the number of `file` calls needed to identify stripped and
non-stripped binaries, I'd say...
--
Diego
On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 11:28 +0100, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
On Thursday 09 March 2006 04:12, Mike Frysinger wrote:
this is kind of a pita in terms of maintenance and imo a hack ... why not
just have the splitelf code skip stripped binaries
Because of the number of `file` calls needed
Okay, solar asked me yesterday, and I think this might be the good moment to
start this out.
Right now the x86-fbsd keyword is not being used in the main tree, and the
whole Gentoo/FreeBSD is handled in an overlay, sharing the ~x86 keyword with
standard Gentoo/Linux.
Unfortunately this has a
Luca Longinotti wrote:
As the title says, what would you prefer for the future of MySQL in Gentoo?
Please take a moment to read
https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-438557.html and vote (and
eventually comment on it).
Thanks!
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125599
deprecation of
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
Okay, solar asked me yesterday, and I think this might be the good moment to
start this out.
Right now the x86-fbsd keyword is not being used in the main tree, and the
whole Gentoo/FreeBSD is handled in an overlay, sharing the ~x86 keyword with
standard
On Thu, 09 Mar 2006 10:20:33 -0500
Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Basically portage expands $ARCH into use ( so
x86-fbsd has ARCH x86, and would get x86 in use, which IMHO, isn't
that horrible ). However, you also don't get x86-fbsd shoved into
USE, so you have to inject it elsewhere,
On Thu, 9 Mar 2006 15:29:23 +0100
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To bring ~x86-fbsd keywording in main tree, we mainly need to move a
true profile in the tree, not a dummy one, mark it as indev and start
the keywording. (I've already cleaned up the default-bsd/fbsd profile
On Thursday 09 March 2006 16:20, Alec Warner wrote:
Basically portage expands $ARCH into use ( so x86-fbsd has
ARCH x86, and would get x86 in use, which IMHO, isn't that horrible ).
Right now ARCH=x86-fbsd for G/FBSD, as spb already said, so it's not much of
the problem.
If that will change,
Francesco Riosa wrote:
Luca (chtekk) Longinotti, will also take care of MySQL, on my request,
in a near future, then I'll stay as a backup maintainer for the time
coming, or leave if needed for whatever reason.
Don't be so hard on yourself. Everyone thinks you did a great job with
MySQL. Only
Stephen Bennett wrote:
On Thu, 09 Mar 2006 10:20:33 -0500
Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Basically portage expands $ARCH into use ( so
x86-fbsd has ARCH x86, and would get x86 in use, which IMHO, isn't
that horrible ). However, you also don't get x86-fbsd shoved into
USE, so you have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yup. Chalk up one more for the SoCal conspiracy. ^_^
Peter Gordon wrote:
Another Southern Californian, it would seem. Excellent. If you're ever
in the Anaheim/Orange County Area give me a jingle. We could go for some
Starbucks and head to Fry's or
On 09-03-2006 12:30:33 -0500, Alec Warner wrote:
Regardless, I'd like to reach a conclusion about this, was GLEP 47
submitted to the council for the next meeting?
As far as I know: no. I didn't myself because I'm having a problem with
ppc-macos and the upcoming x86-macos (they will probably
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 11:58:03 +0100
Patrick Lauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
During that discussion we realized that having utf-8 not enabled by
default and no utf8 fonts available by default causes lots of
recompilation and reconfiguration.
Enabling the unicode useflag in the profiles should
On Thursday 09 March 2006 20:37, Grobian wrote:
As far as I know: no. I didn't myself because I'm having a problem with
ppc-macos and the upcoming x86-macos (they will probably have a lot in
common) and am not completely sure whether what Diego and I proposed is
actually flexible enough.
I
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
NOTE: Please post all replies on gentoo-desktop rather than gentoo-dev.
It's about that time again, folks. We're going to have desktop project
lead elections within the next month or so.
Who's interested in running for lead? Feel free to post a bit on why
you'll
On Thursday 09 March 2006 09:24, Mikey wrote:
That is my point. There is nothing there to strip
file a bug
yet during an install I
noticed it running scanelf on the entire 248 meg source tree. Kind of a
pointless task, not to mention extremely wasteful of resources.
yes and no
scanelf
portage_const.py defines finally PROFILE_PATH and MAKE_CONF_FILE.
As I use portage to build on one host multiple different
(embedded) systems with completely different profiles,
I hacked portage_const.py to look for an environment variable
and if defined use that for defining PROFILE_PATH and
17 matches
Mail list logo
