Re: [gentoo-dev] Making the developer community more open

2006-03-21 Thread Thomas Cort
One of the bigger problems is that we have a huge user community who are keen on contributing, but we have such a high barrier for entry to the developer community. There are the arch tester[1] projects (x86, amd64, ppc, alpha (soon), and maybe others). Those lower the barrier a lot while

Re: [gentoo-dev] Making the developer community more open

2006-03-21 Thread Simon Stelling
Bret Towe wrote: perhaps having some proxys of a sort that accept patchs and such from trusted users that would commit fixes to portage would help. similiar to the kernel format that way users can 'commit'/help out quickly without having to go thru the long process of becoming a dev Users can

Re: [gentoo-dev] Global logrotate use flag

2006-03-21 Thread Grobian
Have a look at these: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/27451 http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/30090 On 21-03-2006 14:19:31 +0100, Jeroen Roovers wrote: Hi everyone, I noticed 'logrotate' is becoming quite generic as a use flag: -- Fabian Groffen --

Re: [gentoo-dev] Global logrotate use flag

2006-03-21 Thread Markus Rothe
Jeroen Roovers wrote: All descriptions seem to indicate exactly the same thing. Maybe now it's time to make it a global use flag. There was already a discussion about this. Look here: [1] Regards, Markus [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/27451 pgpxiTaRKSW71.pgp

[gentoo-dev] Global logrotate use flag

2006-03-21 Thread Jeroen Roovers
Hi everyone, I noticed 'logrotate' is becoming quite generic as a use flag: # euses logrotate app-backup/bacula:logrotate - Install support files for logrotate mail-filter/dspam:logrotate - Install support files for logrotate net-ftp/vsftpd:logrotate - Use logrotate for rotating logs

[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: package naming

2006-03-21 Thread Duncan
Chris Gianelloni posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Mon, 20 Mar 2006 15:20:35 -0500: On Mon, 2006-03-20 at 12:37 -0700, Duncan wrote: Agreed if keeping the old name with a gentoo prefix/suffix is chosen. However, nearly all Gentoo system tools are ewhatever (not only portage

Re: [gentoo-dev] Global logrotate use flag

2006-03-21 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 13:28:38 + Markus Rothe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/27451 I read that at the time. This is just a reminder. JeR -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Making the developer community more open

2006-03-21 Thread Paul de Vrieze
On Tuesday 21 March 2006 07:05, Alin Nastac wrote: Yes, it is hard to find the right people. Yes, a big percentage of recruiting team's time will be lost on useless additions/removals. But the only solution is scaling the recruiting team to gentoo needs. IMO recruiting team is too small to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Making the developer community more open

2006-03-21 Thread Brandon Edens
On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 11:07:37PM +, Daniel Drake wrote: I'm looking for ideas - preferably big, drastic, shiny ones. Ignore any issues relating to migration away from our current system. What would be the _ideal_ way for Gentoo to handle contributions from anyone? (note that I'm

Re: [gentoo-dev] New Developer: Karol Pasternak (reb)

2006-03-21 Thread Karol Wojtaszek
Danny van Dyk wrote: Ladies and Gentoo-men, [This announcement comes a bit late, sorry :-)] It is my honour to proudly present you Karol Pasternak, also known as reb. Karol lives in Koszalin, Poland and turned 20 some days ago (I hope you had a happy birthday). Besides his interest in

Re: [gentoo-dev] New Developer: Karol Pasternak (reb)

2006-03-21 Thread Michael Cummings
On Tuesday 21 March 2006 14:25, Karol Wojtaszek wrote: Welcome aboard Karol! One more person from Poland! Let's takeover Gentoo and make it Polish distro! ; i thought it was polished alreadyoh...polish ;) -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Making the developer community more open

2006-03-21 Thread Daniel Drake
Hi Brandon, Brandon Edens wrote: When I was a system administrator working with Gentoo I would've appreciated a way to interact with the other Gentoo system administrators. snip You seem to be purely describing interactions with the user community from a user perspective. My post was about

Re: [gentoo-dev] Making the developer community more open

2006-03-21 Thread Daniel Goller
On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 13:09 +0100, Simon Stelling wrote: Bret Towe wrote: perhaps having some proxys of a sort that accept patchs and such from trusted users that would commit fixes to portage would help. similiar to the kernel format that way users can 'commit'/help out quickly without

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: User created package lists

2006-03-21 Thread tvali
What about something along these lines... Add the capability for emerge to take a category as an argument, emerge www-apps for example, and emerge all packages within that category. Optionally make it so this will only work on categories within PORTDIR_OVERLAY, or create a new type of

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: User created package lists

2006-03-21 Thread Kevin F. Quinn (Gentoo)
On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 10:50:00 -0600 MIkey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Add the capability for emerge to take a category as an argument, # (cd ${PORTDIR_OVERLAY} emerge -pv category/*) Then the user can create overlays with their own category names and symlink in the package directories they want

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] lirc-0.8.0 with kernel 2.6.16

2006-03-21 Thread Paul Marks
I couldn't get my lirc-0.8.0 to compile with the new kernel 2.6.16, so I pulled a couple files out of CVS and generated this patch. It works for me on 2.6.16 now. diff -Naur lirc-0.8.0/drivers/kcompat.h lirc-kernel-2.6.16/drivers/kcompat.h --- lirc-0.8.0/drivers/kcompat.h2006-01-07

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] lirc-0.8.0 with kernel 2.6.16

2006-03-21 Thread Paul Marks
Paul Marks wrote: I couldn't get my lirc-0.8.0 to compile with the new kernel 2.6.16, so I pulled a couple files out of CVS and generated this patch. It works for me on 2.6.16 now. Sorry, I think I may have sent this to the wrong list. I better go read more carefully and figure out where