Alec Warner napsal(a):
Jakub Moc wrote:
Danny van Dyk napsal(a):
which breaks the metadata cache. Any objections to change it
to
SLOT=0
As noted on the relevant bug [1], the eclass is a complete no-op and
nothing can be installed using this eclass (has been so for quite some
time).
Jakub Moc wrote:
Alec Warner napsal(a):
Jakub Moc wrote:
Danny van Dyk napsal(a):
which breaks the metadata cache. Any objections to change it
to
SLOT=0
As noted on the relevant bug [1], the eclass is a complete no-op and
nothing can be installed using this eclass (has been so for quite
Alec Warner napsal(a):
See the bug? It says 'slot is being set to $KV, which breaks the
metadata cache. Also, portage may fail to set $KV to a valid slot value
(typically 0) and thus the package may end up with SLOT= which is also
invalid'.
Thats what we are trying to fix.
There's
On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 12:02:39PM +0100, Jakub Moc wrote:
Alec Warner napsal(a):
See the bug? It says 'slot is being set to $KV, which breaks the
metadata cache. Also, portage may fail to set $KV to a valid slot value
(typically 0) and thus the package may end up with SLOT= which is
Bryan Østergaard napsal(a):
On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 12:02:39PM +0100, Jakub Moc wrote:
Jakub, please stop making a fool of yourself with your endless rants.
Quite a few experienced ebuild developers have already told you why it's
not being removed. As such your rants are only wasting time.
Jakub Moc wrote:
- Folks, this car won't go any more, the engine has blown. Help.
-- No worries, we'll fix the scratched paint on your left door and
everything will be cool...
the ebuild remains since it could be necessary to uninstall old packages...
so fixing SLOT is the correct solution.
Luca Barbato wrote:
Jakub Moc wrote:
- Folks, this car won't go any more, the engine has blown. Help.
-- No worries, we'll fix the scratched paint on your left door and
everything will be cool...
the ebuild remains since it could be necessary to uninstall old packages...
so fixing SLOT
Petteri Räty napsal(a):
Luca Barbato wrote:
the ebuild remains since it could be necessary to uninstall old packages...
so fixing SLOT is the correct solution.
Those packages that couldn't be installed since X.org (as opposed to
XFree) did hit the tree because the eclass just dies and for
On Sunday 28 January 2007 06:00:07 Daniel Drake wrote:
I'm happy to take care of this
+1.
--
voxus
:wq
pgpNt6eonq05e.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Saturday, 27. January. 2007 13:22:56 Petteri Räty wrote:
Raúl Porcel wrote:
# Raúl Porcel [EMAIL PROTECTED] (27 Jan 2007)
# Masked for removal 26 Feb 2007, bug 135257, security issues
# Replaced by www-client/seamonkey[-bin]
www-client/mozilla
www-client/mozilla-bin
How about not
Hi,
As we all notice from time to time, amd64 team is lacking behind a bit,
due to various reasons. a) manpower, b) a lot of keywording.
Java team asked arch teams if they object when Java team marks stable
generation-2 ebuilds on their own, due to the long time it takes and to
the amount of
Isn't this kind of against what glep40 set out to do?
On 1/28/07, Christian Faulhammer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
As we all notice from time to time, amd64 team is lacking behind a bit,
due to various reasons. a) manpower, b) a lot of keywording.
Java team asked arch teams if they object
Christian Faulhammer wrote:
So, maybe we can discuss here another helping hand for amd64. Devs
that work with a given software (not necessarily the maintainer) on
amd64 architecture
It seems like this should be discussed amongst the active amd64
developers internally first, and perhaps
The subject of what to do if a council member voluntarily leaves the
council came up at the last meeting. The glep doesn't cover what to do
in this case.
Here are the options:
1. re-elect a whole new council.
2. elect a new member at a reduced term to fill the vacancy.
3. take the 8th spot
On Sun, 2007-28-01 at 14:24 -0800, Mike Doty wrote:
The subject of what to do if a council member voluntarily leaves the
council came up at the last meeting. The glep doesn't cover what to do
in this case.
Here are the options:
1. re-elect a whole new council.
2. elect a new member at
Dan Meltzer wrote:
Isn't this kind of against what glep40 set out to do?
Top posting...
Any way the thing was that the only change in these ebuilds are the
eclasses/eclass functions used and the new eclasses have been proven
stable already.
Regards,
Petteri
signature.asc
Description:
On 1/28/07, Petteri Räty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dan Meltzer wrote:
Isn't this kind of against what glep40 set out to do?
Top posting...
Any way the thing was that the only change in these ebuilds are the
eclasses/eclass functions used and the new eclasses have been proven
stable already.
Dan Meltzer wrote:
On 1/28/07, Petteri Räty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dan Meltzer wrote:
Isn't this kind of against what glep40 set out to do?
Top posting...
Any way the thing was that the only change in these ebuilds are the
eclasses/eclass functions used and the new eclasses have been
On Sunday 28 January 2007 17:24, Mike Doty wrote:
The subject of what to do if a council member voluntarily leaves the
council came up at the last meeting.
i dont think the voluntarily qualification should be there ... if a dev
turns jackass and they get punted and they happen to be on the
Dan Meltzer wrote:
On 1/28/07, Petteri Räty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dan Meltzer wrote:
Isn't this kind of against what glep40 set out to do?
Top posting...
Any way the thing was that the only change in these ebuilds are the
eclasses/eclass functions used and the new eclasses have been
On Sun, 28 Jan 2007 19:17:35 +0100 (MET) Christian Faulhammer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| As we all notice from time to time, amd64 team is lacking behind a
| bit, due to various reasons. a) manpower, b) a lot of keywording.
| Java team asked arch teams if they object when Java team marks stable
|
On Friday 26 January 2007 17:41, Mike Frysinger wrote:
that said, i would entertain the notion of auto uncompressing
just .bz2, .gz, .Z and telling everyone else to toss off ...
talking with zmedico; this is what he wants so ive implemented this
-mike
pgplsTrnzmpNo.pgp
Description: PGP
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Sunday 28 January 2007 17:24, Mike Doty wrote:
1. re-elect a whole new council.
2. elect a new member at a reduced term to fill the vacancy.
3. take the 8th spot from the last election.
i'd lean towards three here ... also, s/8th/next/ in case we shed more than 1
Ciaran McCreesh [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sun, 28 Jan 2007 19:17:35 +0100 (MET) Christian Faulhammer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| As we all notice from time to time, amd64 team is lacking behind a
| bit, due to various reasons. a) manpower, b) a lot of keywording.
| Java team asked arch teams if
24 matches
Mail list logo
