Piotr Jaroszyński a écrit :
On Tuesday 01 of May 2007 21:53:36 Maurice van der Pot wrote:
I'm not sure why this is a reply to my message instead of the message I
replied to. They both provide more or less the same choice to the user.
Err I wasn't providing any choices for users yet, I only
Hi Daniel,
Am Mittwoch, 2. Mai 2007 schrieb Daniel Gryniewicz:
Honestly, tests are nice, but too many of them are broken upstream,
and we are not (and should not be, IMO) in the position of fixing
them all. If a developer wants to work with her upstream to fix the
tests in her packages, great
Am Mittwoch, 2. Mai 2007 schrieb Rémi Cardona:
Piotr Jaroszyński a écrit :
On Tuesday 01 of May 2007 21:53:36 Maurice van der Pot wrote:
I'm not sure why this is a reply to my message instead of the
message I replied to. They both provide more or less the same
choice to the user.
Err
Petteri Räty kirjoitti:
I made a patch to remove all retired developers from the project pages.
If anyone doesn't object I will commit this next week.
Regards,
Petteri
Done with the attached patch.
Regards,
Petteri
? retired.patch
Index: en/base/alpha/index.xml
Count me in.
Recently I've been having fun knocking up kernel modules at work so I
understand the build system reasonably well. Happy to help wherever.
Cheers
Rob
On 30/04/07, bret curtis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Daniel,
I would love to be more involved in kernel details. I've been in
Petteri Räty kirjoitti:
Petteri Räty kirjoitti:
I made a patch to remove all retired developers from the project pages.
If anyone doesn't object I will commit this next week.
Regards,
Petteri
Done with the attached patch.
Regards,
Petteri
cvs [commit aborted]: could not open lock
On 02.05.2007, at 02:32, Marius Mauch wrote:
a) cost (in terms of runtime, resource usage, additional deps)
Tools for this could be implemented in the package manager. The
package has to be installed and tested by the developer, so if
portage would show the times for each stage or the
On Tue, 1 May 2007 17:34:07 -0700
Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 12:55:05AM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
You're talking implementation details. This isn't the time for that!
No-one has worked out what, if anything, is to be done, so you can't
know how much
On Tue, 01 May 2007 21:51:17 -0400
Daniel Gryniewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sure, but now you're requiring me to go through all that extra work
if I want any of the benefits of EAPI=1.
It is likely that EAPI-1 will be stricter in quite a few areas...
Or, third option, is that everyone marks
Anyone have a reason why we can't start to put them in the tree?
Portage support is, I'm told, coming in a month or so, and other
package managers have supported glep42 for a while now. The format is
well specified by the GLEP, so compatibility shouldn't be an issue.
The one thing I can see
# Samuli Suominen [EMAIL PROTECTED] (2 May 2007)
# Masked for removal in 30 days. See bug #176150.
# Use x11-misc/slim instead.
x11-misc/login-app
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Samuli Suominen schrieb:
# Samuli Suominen [EMAIL PROTECTED] (2 May 2007)
# Masked for removal in 30 days. See bug #176150.
# Use x11-misc/slim instead.
x11-misc/login-app
Thanks for reacting so fast and adding slim to the tree!
Regards,
Daniel
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Tuesday 01 May 2007, Piotr Jaroszyński wrote:
There was some discussion about forcing/not forcing tests in EAPI-1, but
there was clearly no compromise.
the compromise was that requiring in spec is wrong ... default handling of
tests is up to the package manager / profiles / teams
Imho,
On Wed, 2 May 2007 16:05:06 -0400
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 01 May 2007, Piotr Jaroszyński wrote:
There was some discussion about forcing/not forcing tests in
EAPI-1, but there was clearly no compromise.
the compromise was that requiring in spec is wrong ...
On Tuesday 01 May 2007, Petteri Räty wrote:
Mike Frysinger kirjoitti:
If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole
Gentoo dev list to see.
I would like the council to remind everyone that this is not
Petteri Räty wrote:
-date2006-05-02/date
+date$DATE: $/date
Please revert all date changes you've made for following reasons:
a) $DATE: $ isn't expanded by CVS
b) Even if it was expanded, I won't be expanded to the -mm-dd format
c) Even if it was in -mm-dd format, it won't be fully
On Wed, 2 May 2007 16:49:32 -0400
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 01 May 2007, Petteri Räty wrote:
Mike Frysinger kirjoitti:
If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole
Gentoo dev
On Wednesday 02 May 2007, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
the issue has been taken care of
You have a conflict of interest in this one. What do other Council
members who aren't games team members think?
perhaps you should try reading the bug
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
On 02/05/07, Stephen Bennett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The one thing I can see needing to be decided first is an open question
in the glep: do we want to put the news items straight into gentoo-x86,
or a seperate repository that will be merged into the tree during the
cvs-rsync process?
From
Jan Kundrát kirjoitti:
Petteri Räty wrote:
-date2006-05-02/date
+date$DATE: $/date
Please revert all date changes you've made for following reasons:
Maybe next time comment on the original patch to avoid pointless work.
Regards,
Petteri
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
On Wednesday 02 May 2007, Petteri Räty wrote:
Jan Kundrát kirjoitti:
Petteri Räty wrote:
-date2006-05-02/date
+date$DATE: $/date
Please revert all date changes you've made for following reasons:
Maybe next time comment on the original patch to avoid pointless work.
was this reply
Petteri Räty wrote:
Maybe next time comment on the original patch to avoid pointless work.
Well, first lines weren't changing any dates, so I've skipped the rest
of the original mail. It was a pure coincidence that I spot them now.
Anyway, thanks for fixing and removing retired people,
-jkt
--
Mike Frysinger kirjoitti:
On Wednesday 02 May 2007, Petteri Räty wrote:
Jan Kundrát kirjoitti:
Petteri Räty wrote:
-date2006-05-02/date
+date$DATE: $/date
Please revert all date changes you've made for following reasons:
Maybe next time comment on the original patch to avoid pointless work.
Petteri Räty wrote:
was this reply really necessary ? you made a mistake and Jan didnt catch it
until after you committed it. perhaps you meant to say thank you, ive
fixed
the issues you pointed out to me.
-mike
Plaah cultural issues. I just hope my comment makes people read the
Stephen Bennett wrote:
Anyone have a reason why we can't start to put them in the tree?
Portage support is, I'm told, coming in a month or so, and other
package managers have supported glep42 for a while now. The format is
well specified by the GLEP, so compatibility shouldn't be an issue.
25 matches
Mail list logo
