Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo

2007-07-18 Thread Kent Fredric
On 7/18/07, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 07:16 -0500, Rick Sivernell wrote: I am trying to contact somebody in charge of gentoo. I have tried for years now to get my email address off your list, but all has failed. If someone knows this person or will send

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-council] Nominations open for the Gentoo Council 2007/08

2007-07-18 Thread Luca Barbato
Mike Frysinger wrote: i dont think he'll accept, but i dont see Flameeyes name yet ... -mike +1 -- Luca Barbato Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Paludis and Emacs overlay

2007-07-18 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 21:31:50 +0200 Christian Faulhammer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just read Donnie's nice article [1] and went through the comments. One saying After switching to paludis, I installed layman, and used it to kick-start some of the overlays.gentoo.org stuff. Paludis expects

Re: [gentoo-dev] x86 toolchain changes heads up

2007-07-18 Thread Peter Gordon
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 19:47 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: historically, gcc on x86 has always defaulted to i386. some people noticed recently that glibc-2.6 fails to build in this situation as they were only setting -mtune via CFLAGS, not -march. i'll be tweaking gcc so that it will

Re: [gentoo-dev] x86 toolchain changes heads up

2007-07-18 Thread Ioannis Aslanidis
I think it's the other way arround. -march=ix86 is implicit unless you override it with a user variable. On 7/18/07, Peter Gordon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 19:47 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: historically, gcc on x86 has always defaulted to i386. some people noticed

Re: [gentoo-dev] x86 toolchain changes heads up

2007-07-18 Thread Vlastimil Babka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Peter Gordon wrote: On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 19:47 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: historically, gcc on x86 has always defaulted to i386. some people noticed recently that glibc-2.6 fails to build in this situation as they were only setting -mtune

Re: [gentoo-dev] Paludis and Emacs overlay

2007-07-18 Thread Ulrich Mueller
On Wed, 18 Jul 2007, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: Hrm, I don't see any warnings for the emacs overlay [...] Usually when people get errors with an overlay it's because of a missing profiles/repo_name file, which isn't the case here. It might well be the reason since the comment on LWN is from 5

Re: [gentoo-dev] x86 toolchain changes heads up

2007-07-18 Thread Andrew Gaffney
Peter Gordon wrote: On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 19:47 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: historically, gcc on x86 has always defaulted to i386. some people noticed recently that glibc-2.6 fails to build in this situation as they were only setting -mtune via CFLAGS, not -march. i'll be tweaking gcc so

Re: [gentoo-dev] x86 toolchain changes heads up

2007-07-18 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Wednesday 18 July 2007, Peter Gordon wrote: On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 19:47 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: historically, gcc on x86 has always defaulted to i386. some people noticed recently that glibc-2.6 fails to build in this situation as they were only setting -mtune via CFLAGS, not

[gentoo-dev] Re: x86 toolchain changes heads up

2007-07-18 Thread Ryan Hill
Vlastimil Babka wrote: Peter Gordon wrote: On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 19:47 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: historically, gcc on x86 has always defaulted to i386. some people noticed recently that glibc-2.6 fails to build in this situation as they were only setting -mtune via CFLAGS, not -march.

[gentoo-dev] Re: Getting -project started

2007-07-18 Thread Duncan
Kumba [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Tue, 17 Jul 2007 09:50:26 -0400: George Prowse wrote: So that would mean that welcoming new developers would be on the -project list? My thinking, I think they would fit better over there, since it is somewhat

[gentoo-dev] Re: Getting -project started

2007-07-18 Thread Duncan
Philip Webb [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Tue, 17 Jul 2007 23:28:57 -0400: To this user since 2003, who plans to install Gentoo in the new machine which I am presently designing, this sounds like a very welcome development. I shall continue to subscribe to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Getting -project started

2007-07-18 Thread Joe Peterson
Duncan wrote: Philip Webb [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted: To this user since 2003, who plans to install Gentoo in the new machine which I am presently designing, this sounds like a very welcome development. I shall continue to subscribe to -dev , but not to -project. Should I also subscribe to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Getting -project started

2007-07-18 Thread Richard Freeman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Duncan wrote: According to the bug on -project (which I was CCed to), both it and dev- announce have been created. New developers are announcements. The primary announcement should therefore go to dev-announce, x-posted to dev, with

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Getting -project started

2007-07-18 Thread Richard Freeman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Joe Peterson wrote: I suspect not is the way it was set up, since clearly all posts to the new -dev-announce will not be technical, and so they should not be relayed to -dev automatically. Anyone know? I like the idea of auto-crossposting, but

[gentoo-dev] Lastrite: media-libs/janus

2007-07-18 Thread Samuli Suominen
# Samuli Suominen [EMAIL PROTECTED] (18 Jul 2007) # Masked for treecleaners bug 185386. Unfetchable package, # homepage is unavailable and for using GTK+-1.2. # Removed in 60 days. media-libs/janus It actually redirects you to Disney travel agency pages from homepage. *g* -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [gentoo-dev] x86 toolchain changes heads up

2007-07-18 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 19:47 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: historically, gcc on x86 has always defaulted to i386. some people noticed recently that glibc-2.6 fails to build in this situation as they were only setting -mtune via CFLAGS, not -march. i'll be tweaking gcc so that it will

[gentoo-dev] Council Nominations

2007-07-18 Thread Doug Goldstein
All, You've all stated that you accept or don't accept (but this is targeted at the acceptors, sorry non-acceptors) but the people that accept haven't really given much reason as to why they would be a good candidate. In fact many of the nominations don't even have that information attached.

[gentoo-dev] Re: Council Nominations

2007-07-18 Thread Torsten Veller
* Doug Goldstein [EMAIL PROTECTED]: So, let's hear some reasons why I as a Gentoo developer should vote for you. And here's a hint, be more forward looking then the current 100+ post threads on the -dev ML. Let's hear your {2,3,5} year plan for Gentoo. Sounds good. For the sake of everyone's

[gentoo-dev] Zombie: Sven Vermeulen (swift)

2007-07-18 Thread Petteri Räty
Your doc zombie Sven Vermeulen has risen from his grave and is back to beat www.gentoo.org/doc/en with his fingers. Give him the usual welcome with nice head shots. Regards, Petteri PS. I tried but couldn't get myself subscribed to -dev-announce yet but maybe before the next one :)

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Getting -project started

2007-07-18 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 02:20:46PM -0400, Richard Freeman wrote: :0 Wh: msgid.lock | formail -D 8192 msgid.cache :0 a: /dev/null I'd advise against this bit of procmail hackery. I used to use it, until I ran into some MUAs that did not generate sane message-ids (Lotus Notes, certain versions

Re: [gentoo-dev] Zombie: Sven Vermeulen (swift)

2007-07-18 Thread Davide Cendron
Il Wednesday 18 July 2007 23:22:56 Petteri Räty ha scritto: Your doc zombie Sven Vermeulen has risen from his grave and is back to beat www.gentoo.org/doc/en with his fingers. Give him the usual welcome with nice head shots. Regards, Petteri PS. I tried but couldn't get myself subscribed

Re: [gentoo-dev] Zombie: Sven Vermeulen (swift)

2007-07-18 Thread Dimitry Bradt
Petteri Räty wrote: Your doc zombie Sven Vermeulen has risen from his grave and is back to beat www.gentoo.org/doc/en with his fingers. Give him the usual welcome with nice head shots. Welcome back, Sven :) Kind Regards, -- Dimitry Bradt - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo/Linux Developer --

Re: [gentoo-dev] Zombie: Sven Vermeulen (swift)

2007-07-18 Thread Santiago M. Mola
On 7/18/07, Petteri Räty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Your doc zombie Sven Vermeulen has risen from his grave and is back to beat www.gentoo.org/doc/en with his fingers. Give him the usual welcome with nice head shots. Welcome back Sven! Btw, you should be nominated for Council because of bug

Re: [gentoo-dev] Zombie: Sven Vermeulen (swift)

2007-07-18 Thread Josh Saddler
Petteri Räty wrote: Your doc zombie Sven Vermeulen has risen from his grave and is back to beat www.gentoo.org/doc/en with his fingers. Give him the usual welcome with nice head shots. Hi SwifTy. See you 'round our channel! signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] net-im/pidgin protocols

2007-07-18 Thread Eric Polino
Would it be possible to have all the protocols for net-im/pidgin turned on by default. We often get people coming to #pidgin looking for help as to why they can't get MSN or some other protocol working. It most often is because they haven't enabled the given protocol USE flag. There is nothing

Re: [gentoo-dev] net-im/pidgin protocols

2007-07-18 Thread Eric Polino
On 7/19/07, Caleb Cushing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: another option could just be to enable the protocols in the ebuild by default (or does that have to be done globally in profile?) and force users to turn them off if they don't want them. Yeah that would have to be done in the profile. We