On Tuesday 18 September 2007, Alin Nastac (mrness) wrote:
mrness 07/09/18 18:53:40
Modified: wvstreams-4.4.ebuild wvstreams-4.3-r2.ebuild
ChangeLog
Log:
Set WANT_AUTOCONF=latest (#192947).
(Portage version: 2.1.2.12)
there is no need to do
On 18:32 Wed 19 Sep , Olivier Fisette (ribosome) wrote:
Modified: ChangeLog
Added:phylip-3.67.ebuild
Log:
New upstream version.
(Portage version: 2.1.3.9)
file :
On Wednesday 19 September 2007, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
On 18:32 Wed 19 Sep , Olivier Fisette (ribosome) wrote:
Modified: ChangeLog
Added:phylip-3.67.ebuild
Log:
New upstream version.
(Portage version: 2.1.3.9)
file :
On the forums, I've seen the question, Why isn't my .bashrc being
executed when I log in as root but is being executed when I log in as a
normal user?, asked half a dozen times on the forums. Heck, I even
asked it myself a few years ago. Now, two years later, from a slightly
more mature level of
John R. Graham wrote:
On the forums, I've seen the question, Why isn't my .bashrc being
executed when I log in as root but is being executed when I log in as a
normal user?, asked half a dozen times on the forums. Heck, I even
asked it myself a few years ago. Now, two years later, from a
Andrew Gaffney wrote:
When catalyst builds a stage tarball, it doesn't add any additional
files. All files in any stage tarball are created by one of the
packages contained within. In order to do this, a package such as
baselayout would have to install the file.
Looking at my local
John R. Graham wrote:
like sys-apps/miscfiles. But where it should or shouldn't come from
doesn't answer the fundamental question, Shouldn't it be there, from
*some* source?
Easy answer: no. Do you really want any script to automatically run
when you login as root? think of exploits and the
Mike, that exploit is neither easier nor harder if a default
.bash_profile exists. Or, am I missing something?
- John
Mike Doty wrote:
John R. Graham wrote:
like sys-apps/miscfiles. But where it should or shouldn't come from
doesn't answer the fundamental question, Shouldn't it be there,