[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-proxy/polipo: ChangeLog polipo-1.0.3.ebuild polipo-1.0.1.ebuild polipo-1.0.0.ebuild polipo-0.9.12-r1.ebuild

2007-11-03 Thread Alin Năstac
Donnie Berkholz wrote: On 15:38 Fri 02 Nov , Alin Nastac (mrness) wrote: 1.1 net-proxy/polipo/polipo-1.0.3.ebuild file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/net-proxy/polipo/polipo-1.0.3.ebuild?rev=1.1view=markup plain:

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-proxy/polipo: ChangeLog polipo-1.0.3.ebuild polipo-1.0.1.ebuild polipo-1.0.0.ebuild polipo-0.9.12-r1.ebuild

2007-11-03 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 10:37 Sat 03 Nov , Alin Năstac wrote: You have to create users and groups in both pkg_ functions: - pkg_setup : when installation is performed the usual way, through compilation - pkg_preinst: when installed from binary package (-k) You shouldn't, all pkg_* functions should always

[gentoo-dev] It's Bugday!

2007-11-03 Thread Peter Weller
It's bugday today, guys and gals! Come along to #gentoo-bugs on irc.freenode.org and help fix bugs! As per usual, there is a list of suitable bug candidates for you guys to help us devs out with at http://bugday.gentoo.org/. If anyone has any requests with regards to adding bugs to that page,

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-java/sun-jaf-bin

2007-11-03 Thread Petteri Räty
+# Petteri Räty [EMAIL PROTECTED] (3 Nov 2007) +# Replaced by dev-java/sun-jaf. Will be moved to Junkyard +# after the month is up. +dev-java/sun-jaf-bin + signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] Re: POSIX shell and portable

2007-11-03 Thread Steve Long
Roy Marples wrote: On Sat, 2007-11-03 at 01:19 +0100, Fabian Groffen wrote: Please stop calling it more portable. The shell code you see in configure can in a way be called portable. Your POSIX compliant stuff isn't. In fact, by stating #!/bin/sh you actually make the code useless on a

[gentoo-dev] Re: It's Bugday!

2007-11-03 Thread Ryan Hill
Peter Weller wrote: It's bugday today, guys and gals! Come along to #gentoo-bugs on irc.freenode.org and help fix bugs! As per usual, there is a list of suitable bug candidates for you guys to help us devs out with at http://bugday.gentoo.org/. If anyone has any requests with regards to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-proxy/polipo: ChangeLog polipo-1.0.3.ebuild polipo-1.0.1.ebuild polipo-1.0.0.ebuild polipo-0.9.12-r1.ebuild

2007-11-03 Thread Alin Năstac
Donnie Berkholz wrote: On 10:37 Sat 03 Nov , Alin Năstac wrote: You have to create users and groups in both pkg_ functions: - pkg_setup : when installation is performed the usual way, through compilation - pkg_preinst: when installed from binary package (-k) You shouldn't,

Re: Fwd: [gentoo-dev] More general interface to use flags

2007-11-03 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Saturday 03 November 2007, Alec Warner wrote: Since portage currently uses bash and to my knowledge is not moving to POSIX shell in the near term, I think bash is appropriate in the implementation. AKA, everyone stop arguing about which is better. there it is, thanks -mike signature.asc

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-proxy/polipo: ChangeLog polipo-1.0.3.ebuild polipo-1.0.1.ebuild polipo-1.0.0.ebuild polipo-0.9.12-r1.ebuild

2007-11-03 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Saturday 03 November 2007, Alin Năstac wrote: Donnie Berkholz wrote: On 10:37 Sat 03 Nov , Alin Năstac wrote: You have to create users and groups in both pkg_ functions: - pkg_setup : when installation is performed the usual way, through compilation - pkg_preinst: when