[gentoo-dev] New USE flags documentation

2007-11-24 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Hi all: I've read on the planet the recently included support to document USE flags in metadata. Seems like it was an idea from flameeyes and cardoe, discussed on the planet [1][2] and performed by -infra (bug #199788). While planet is a good medium to share ideas and get contributors, seems to

Re: [gentoo-dev] New USE flags documentation

2007-11-24 Thread Thilo Bangert
While planet is a good medium to share ideas and get contributors, seems to me like we need a more official way to discuss this kind of 'global' ideas before make them real. Or at least drop a note on -dev-announce explaining the new feature and telling devs and users this is now officially

Re: [gentoo-dev] New USE flags documentation

2007-11-24 Thread Doug Goldstein
Jose Luis Rivero wrote: Hi all: I've read on the planet the recently included support to document USE flags in metadata. Seems like it was an idea from flameeyes and cardoe, discussed on the planet [1][2] and performed by -infra (bug #199788). While planet is a good medium to share ideas and

Re: [gentoo-dev] New USE flags documentation

2007-11-24 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sat, 24 Nov 2007 10:19:55 -0500 Doug Goldstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jose Luis Rivero wrote: Is the feature ready to be used? Is there any kind of documentation (aside of DTD)? It will replace use.desc? Well the first question you answered yourself. You linked to a post I wrote

[gentoo-dev] Good-bye

2007-11-24 Thread Seemant Kulleen
Dear Gentoo Devs and Users, The time has finally come for me to resign from Gentoo. I've been meaning to do it for many months now, but the logistics took a little bit of time. Effective Monday, Nov. 26, I will no longer consider myself an official Gentoo developer. Before then I will make

Re: [gentoo-dev] Good-bye

2007-11-24 Thread Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Seemant Kulleen wrote: Dear Gentoo Devs and Users, The time has finally come for me to resign from Gentoo. I've been meaning to do it for many months now, but the logistics took a little bit of time. Effective Monday, Nov. 26, I will no longer

[gentoo-dev] Add USE_EXPAND for apache

2007-11-24 Thread Benedikt Böhm
Hi all, the current behaviour of the apache ebuild -- chosing built-in modules based on /etc/apache2/apache-builtin-mods -- is very aweful, especially for binary packages. Therefore, i would like to add APACHE2_MODULES and APACHE2_MPMS to USE_EXPAND. I have already converted the ebuild in my

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-cluster/torque/files: pbs_sched-init.d-2.2.1 digest-torque-2.2.1 torque-conf.d-2.2.1 pbs_mom-init.d-2.2.1 torque-env.d-2.2.1 pbs_server-init.

2007-11-24 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 17:47 Sat 24 Nov , Justin Bronder (jsbronder) wrote: 1.1 sys-cluster/torque/files/torque-conf.d-2.2.1 file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-cluster/torque/files/torque-conf.d-2.2.1?rev=1.1view=markup plain:

Re: [gentoo-dev] Add USE_EXPAND for apache

2007-11-24 Thread Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2007-11-24 19:51:23 Benedikt Böhm napisał(a): the current behaviour of the apache ebuild -- chosing built-in modules based on /etc/apache2/apache-builtin-mods -- is very aweful, especially for binary packages. Therefore, i would like to add APACHE2_MODULES and APACHE2_MPMS to USE_EXPAND.

Re: [gentoo-dev] New USE flags documentation

2007-11-24 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Sat, 24 Nov 2007 15:10:58 +0100 Thilo Bangert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: the idea is really great [...] now this needs to be [...] made mandatory for all ebuilds. Uh, what? Why? If the idea is that great, then why does it need to be mandatory? Kind regards, JeR -- [EMAIL

Re: [gentoo-dev] Good-bye

2007-11-24 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 12:39 Sat 24 Nov , Seemant Kulleen wrote: The time has finally come for me to resign from Gentoo. I've been meaning to do it for many months now, but the logistics took a little bit of time. Effective Monday, Nov. 26, I will no longer consider myself an official Gentoo developer.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Add USE_EXPAND for apache

2007-11-24 Thread Benedikt Böhm
On Saturday 24 November 2007 20:42:01 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: 2007-11-24 19:51:23 Benedikt Böhm napisał(a): the current behaviour of the apache ebuild -- chosing built-in modules based on /etc/apache2/apache-builtin-mods -- is very aweful, especially for binary packages.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Good-bye

2007-11-24 Thread Denis Dupeyron
Seemant, On Nov 24, 2007 6:39 PM, Seemant Kulleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The time has finally come for me to resign from Gentoo. I've been meaning to do it for many months now, but the logistics took a little bit of time. Effective Monday, Nov. 26, I will no longer consider myself an

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: TeXLive modular ebuilds ready(?) for the main portage tree

2007-11-24 Thread Ulrich Mueller
On Thu, 22 Nov 2007, Alexis Ballier wrote: I would be strongly in favour of adding also the tex-base virtual. +1 [...] If nobody is against it, feel free to commit this (with or without cstetex, as you wish, I'll kill references to it before removing it anyway); or I'll do it when I'll

Re: [gentoo-dev] Add USE_EXPAND for apache

2007-11-24 Thread Josh Saddler
Benedikt Böhm wrote: Hi all, the current behaviour of the apache ebuild -- chosing built-in modules based on /etc/apache2/apache-builtin-mods -- is very aweful, especially for binary packages. Therefore, i would like to add APACHE2_MODULES and APACHE2_MPMS to USE_EXPAND. I have

Re: [gentoo-dev] Good-bye

2007-11-24 Thread Alin Năstac
Seemant Kulleen wrote: The time has finally come for me to resign from Gentoo. A sad day for Gentoo :-( May the Force be with you! signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature