Joinin us from Graz, Austria is Michael mueli Hammer. He will be
joining us to maintain kerberos related packages. Michael is
responsible
for the infrastructure at the Graz University of Technology and they
run
Gentoo of course. So no longer do you have to think about moving to
other
Petteri Räty schrieb:
Joinin us from Graz, Austria is Michael mueli Hammer. He will be
joining us to maintain kerberos related packages. Michael is responsible
for the infrastructure at the Graz University of Technology and they run
Gentoo of course. So no longer do you have to think about
On 05-05-2008 23:32:53 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
Another one bites the dust. It's my usual pleasure to introduce to your
Jeremy darkside Olexa from Minneapolis, USA. On IRC he goes with the nick
name darsiide because darkside is taken. Let's see if the current owner
gives it up after the
On 01 May 2008 05:30:01
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole
Gentoo dev list to see.
I'd like a decision on the eight digits thing in PMS:
No integer part of
* Duft Markus [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080506 08:13]:
[...] Michael is responsible
for the infrastructure at the Graz University of Technology [...]
I've to correct this because I don't want to adorn myself with
borrowed plumes ;) I am responsible for the infrastructure of the
Insitute for Strength
Enrico Weigelt wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm just installing qemu, which requires gcc-3.x for building.
The current breaks are very ugly, IMHO.
So I'm proposing to add the old gcc-3.x as depedency to qemu,
at least as long as it doesn't build w/ newer gcc.
What do you think about this ?
that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi list,
files installed by portage to ${ROOT} do not have the same time stamps as the
same files
in ${D}. This creates problems for Common Lisp implementations and one Scheme
implementation in our overlay, explained in [1]. Current work-around is
On Wed, 07 May 2008 00:44:28 +0200
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and I think that would be the correct thing to do, but either way I'd
like PMS to specify what should happen wrt to mtimes, so that I can
rely on that.
PMS makes no guarantee as to what happens with mtimes,
On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 01:52:19AM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 07 May 2008 00:44:28 +0200
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and I think that would be the correct thing to do, but either way I'd
like PMS to specify what should happen wrt to mtimes, so that I can
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
Hi list,
files installed by portage to ${ROOT} do not have the same time stamps
as the same files
in ${D}.
Any timestamp difference here is not due to portage itself (since
portage-2.1.3). The timestamp change is
10 matches
Mail list logo
