[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2008-05-28 Thread Krzysiek Pawlik
There are few packages that could use some more loving: * app-editors/scite - easy to maintain, has only one bug open wrt French locales UTF-8 * media-video/griffith - also easy, pending version bump * net-im/jabberd net-im/jabberd2 - thanks to work from Marko Durkovic both are easy to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2008-05-28 Thread Thomas Anderson
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 09:03:33AM +0200, Krzysiek Pawlik wrote: * net-im/jabberd net-im/jabberd2 - thanks to work from Marko Durkovic both are easy to maintain I can take jabberd(maybe jabberd2 too) by proxy, until I finish my quizzes. -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?

2008-05-28 Thread Marius Mauch
As portage-2.2 is about to be unmasked into ~arch soon (there is one weird bug to solve before) it's time to ask for some input on one of the important new features, FEATURES=preserve-libs. (if you're already familiar with it you can skip this paragraph) Simply said, when this feature is enabled

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?

2008-05-28 Thread Ryan Hill
On Thu, 29 May 2008 01:13:16 +0200 Marius Mauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, do you think it should be enabled by default? Yes please. :) I haven't had any problems in the couple of months i've been using it. -- fonts, gcc-porting, by design, by neglect mips,

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?

2008-05-28 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 01:13 Thu 29 May , Marius Mauch wrote: One concern raised by some people is that it might cause old libraries with security issues to stay on the system for eternity even though the package was upgraded, and eventually be preferred by new builds. I can't rule this out completely but