On 05-06-2008 22:47:28 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
On 14:52 Thu 05 Jun , Samuli Suominen wrote:
# Samuli Suominen [EMAIL PROTECTED] (05 Jun 2008)
# Masked for removal in ~30 days by treecleaners.
# Replaced by USE libffi in sys-devel/gcc. Bug 163724.
dev-libs/libffi
On 02:35 Thu 05 Jun , Josh Saddler wrote:
Now that nominations are officially open, I nominate the current council
members (again):
dberkholz
Yes. I'd like to continue trying to make the council more effective.
Thanks,
Donnie
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Leverton wrote:
| On Thursday 05 June 2008 19:21:24 Albert Zeyer wrote:
| Are you sure that Squeak really depends on libffi?
|
| I just compiled it (squeak-3.9.7) fine without having libffi on my
| system and with disabled libffi USE-flag.
|
|
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Alex Howells [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/6/5 Ali Polatel [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I want to nominate:
Fernando J. Pereda -- ferdy
Bo Ørsted Andresen -- zlin
Is there a method for objecting to a nomination, kinda like the
opposite of seconding it? :P
That
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jun 2008 02:35:16 -0700
Josh Saddler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now that nominations are officially open, I nominate the current
council members (again):
amne
betelgeuse
dberkholz
flameeyes
jokey
lu_zero
vapier
As per GLEP 39, I'd like all of the
Ferris McCormick [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri, 06
Jun 2008 01:37:21 +:
2. As one of the first priorities will be setting policy for pending
appeals what policy do you propose ?
I'd also add two new requirements:
1. Any appeal must be heard and
Alex Howells wrote:
In short: vote for me if you want less bullshit, less asshats and a
more fun distribution. That is all.
Damn! Astinus for PM! :)
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Fri, 6 Jun 2008 01:48:03 +0100
Richard Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] kirjoitti:
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 10:35 AM, Josh Saddler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Łukasz Damentko wrote:
Hi guys,
Nominations for the Gentoo Council 2008/2009 are open now and will
be open for the next two weeks (until
After having written this, I realized I might be telegraphing a bit too
much in places. So take the amplifications for what they are worth.
They are more lawyer like than my original response, but I don't see
how to put them into a manifesto.
On Fri, 2008-06-06 at 01:37 +, Ferris McCormick
I also nominate:
NeddySeagoon
Regards,
Ferris
--
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Devrel, Sparc, Userrel, Trustees)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On 13:32 Fri 06 Jun , Ferris McCormick wrote:
On Fri, 2008-06-06 at 01:37 +, Ferris McCormick wrote:
And the bit about hearing appeals assumes that devrel initiated the
disciplinary action being appealed. I'd make it explicit that Council
is not itself a disciplinary body ---
William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 18:17 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Tue, 3 Jun 2008 19:11:44 +0200
Jeroen Roovers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, I would have thought there was a requirement to have been a
developer for at least a year, just like we require
On Fri, 2008-06-06 at 15:35 -0400, Doug Goldstein wrote:
The Gentoo Foundation and the Gentoo Council are two different entities.
But the one Gentoo
Two heads one body. Usually doesn't work for most animals or humans. One
ends up being a parasite to the other.
For further reference please
On 15:53 Fri 06 Jun , William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/about.shtml
The FreeBSD Foundation is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization dedicated
to supporting the FreeBSD Project.
It's clear the that BSD Foundation is directly tied to the BSD project.
I am not
On Fri, 2008-06-06 at 14:13 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
On 15:53 Fri 06 Jun , William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/about.shtml
The FreeBSD Foundation is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization dedicated
to supporting the FreeBSD Project.
It's clear the
On 17:55 Fri 06 Jun , William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
On Fri, 2008-06-06 at 14:13 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
On 15:53 Fri 06 Jun , William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/about.shtml
The FreeBSD Foundation is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization
On Fri, 2008-06-06 at 15:23 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Like comparing Gentoo to a single-brained animal with multiple heads?
But that it is. You have two entities, that both are related to Gentoo
in some form. Overlapping membership, staff, interests, etc.
No comparisons are perfect, but
Joe Peterson wrote:
The problem with a simple echo is that no * appears on the left to
maintain continuity with the rest of the output - and in a color that
makes sense in the context (maybe this isn't a problem - it depends on
whether that visual continuity is desired).
The far biggest
Can you take this off-topic thread to the appropriate list? I'm pretty
tired with hearing the Foundation's self-promotional comments on how
important it is to development on this list. You guys have your own
list for that crap, as it is.
Thanks,
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering
On Sat, 2008-06-07 at 00:42 +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
Joe Peterson wrote:
The problem with a simple echo is that no * appears on the left to
maintain continuity with the rest of the output - and in a color that
makes sense in the context (maybe this isn't a problem - it depends on
Doug Goldstein wrote:
An clearly motivation explanation that I didn't add, which I'm going to
add once I send this is the fact that as per the QA Project,
use.local.desc can not contain a USE flag that already appears globally
in use.desc. This would allow a description for that USE flag to be
Marius Mauch wrote:
It's not about forcing anyone to do something but giving people enough
information on how to implement it _if they choose to do so_. With the
current GLEP they'd have to make arbitrary decisions if e.g. a flag is
defined in both use.local.desc and metadata.xml, or some people
On Sat, 07 Jun 2008 01:40:36 +0200
Vlastimil Babka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Doug Goldstein wrote:
An clearly motivation explanation that I didn't add, which I'm
going to add once I send this is the fact that as per the QA
Project, use.local.desc can not contain a USE flag that already
On Thu, 05 Jun 2008 15:42:24 -0400
Doug Goldstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's a GLEP for the addition of USE flag descriptions to package
metadata. It does not address any future ideas that others may have
had or suggested. It merely gives developers the necessary tools to
document their
William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
On Sat, 2008-06-07 at 00:42 +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
There could be also switch to add newline
before the message but I can't think of a use for it myself.
The question is how to name the switch :) -n could be confusing as
echo -n has the opposite effect.
Joe Peterson wrote:
The comment from Vlastimil about echo not being part of the elog system
is a very valid point indeed. As for how to specify that a newline
should be inserted, I think that using elog switches like -n, -p,
etc., as well as putting more than one string on a line present two
I have an strange idea, it will probably get shot down by everyone or
people will point out that it has been discussed and thought it was a
bad idea but anyway...
...why not invite a developer from another distribution to join the council?
I think inviting co-operation from other areas would
Ferris McCormick wrote:
I also nominate:
NeddySeagoon
Regards,
Ferris
I completely agree. Few people have done more behind the scenes as Roy.
I would also like to nominate zmendico for his excellent work with portage.
George
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
George Prowse wrote:
[stuff]
Take it to gentoo-project, please. This list is s'posed to be for
technical discussion. gentoo-project is more appropriate for this kind
of query.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Ferris McCormick [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri, 06
Jun 2008 14:21:16 +:
On Fri, 2008-06-06 at 09:28 +, Duncan wrote:
Ferris McCormick [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted:
I'd also add two new requirements:
1. Any appeal must be heard and decided within
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jun 2008 15:42:24 -0400
Doug Goldstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's a GLEP for the addition of USE flag descriptions to package
metadata. It does not address any future ideas that others may have
had or suggested. It merely gives developers the necessary
31 matches
Mail list logo
