On 2008-08-11 02:15, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
Removals:
www-apps/knowledgetree 2008-08-09 21:22:58 hoffie
dev-php4/ZendOptimizer 2008-08-09 21:53:34 robbat2
dev-php4/adodb-ext 2008-08-09 21:53:34 robbat2
Alec Warner wrote:
On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 4:18 PM, Nikos Chantziaras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
On 00:26 Mon 11 Aug , Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
My retirement is probably long overdue as I haven't really been active
for several months. It is now clear to me that
Zac Medico wrote:
Given the vast number of possible choices to consider when defining
new PROPERTIES values [1], perhaps we should create a ballot and
hold a vote on definitions that people have submitted. I suppose
that voters would be able to vote yes or no on each proposed
property
Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
My retirement is probably long overdue as I haven't really been active for
several months. It is now clear to me that Gentoo is not moving in the
direction I had wished for and the last council election indicates that
most current Gentoo developers appear to be
Zac Medico wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Tue, 05 Aug 2008 22:15:11 -0700
Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does this seem like a desirable way to represent the virtual
attribute? Any suggestions?
Again, I'm not so sure that this doesn't represent multiple separable
concepts. It
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Ingmar.
Ingmar Vanhassel wrote:
| Hello list,
|
| As usual with this kind of mails, this has been long overdue, but it's
| about time that I retire from Gentoo.
I'm sorry to see you go, but it's not a surprise.
Thanks for all the hard work in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Bo.
Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
| My retirement is probably long overdue as I haven't really been active
for
| several months.
I'm sorry to see you go, but it isn't a surprise.
Thanks for all the hard work in Gentoo and in QT/KDE in particular.
On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Ingmar Vanhassel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There're other projects in the Free-Software world that I currently
enjoy putting my time into more, I'm sure it's more than obvious to those
of you who know me which...
Good luck with that project!
--
Santiago M.
2008/8/11 Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Many folks are happy at the current pace of development. I imagine
these two folks were frustrated at the lack
of new features in the ebuild spec that were readily available in
kdebuild-1 and decided to move on. More power to them I say.
I'm pretty
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 12:26 AM, Bo Ørsted Andresen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My retirement is probably long overdue as I haven't really been active for
several months. It is now clear to me that Gentoo is not moving in the
direction I had wished for and the last council election indicates that
On Sun, 10 Aug 2008 21:51:11 -0700
Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Despite our best efforts Gentoo is not a fun-loving community where
everyone gets along.
Actually, I'd say that's a fairly accurate description of the problem.
Some people think Gentoo should primarily be a fun-loving
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sun, 10 Aug 2008 21:51:11 -0700
Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Despite our best efforts Gentoo is not a fun-loving community where
everyone gets along.
Actually, I'd say that's a fairly accurate description of the problem.
Some people think Gentoo
Patrick Lauer wrote:
If it stops being fun only grumpy old men will do the bare minimum to
keep things from breaking too badly instead of improving things. Meh.
I demand mandatory fun hours twice a week! And a coffee machine. And a
pony. Yes! A pony!
Being bitten by the Pony is not fun.
On 11 Aug 2008, at 14:19, Patrick Lauer wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sun, 10 Aug 2008 21:51:11 -0700
Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Despite our best efforts Gentoo is not a fun-loving community where
everyone gets along.
Actually, I'd say that's a fairly accurate description of
Hi,
I'm maintaining a package of merkaartor in gentoo, of which the latest version
requires qt 4.4. I'll mask that for now, but I'm not really happy with that.
I wanted to ask what are the showstoppers for qt 4.4 to get unmasked. The mask
is commented with:
Masked for testing, various
Hanno Böck wrote:
So question, what are the showstoppers for qt 4.4? And more general comment,
especially on important packages that many people rely on, please provide
more informative comments in package mask, e.g. bug numbers.
Bug numbers should indeed have been provided. The tracker bugs
Anthony Metcalf [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Mon, 11 Aug 2008
14:31:03 +0100:
Patrick Lauer wrote:
If it stops being fun only grumpy old men will do the bare minimum to
keep things from breaking too badly instead of improving things. Meh. I
demand
The following packages have been masked for removal in 30 days.
dev-python/twisted-xish
dev-python/twisted-pair
dev-python/twisted-flow
They are either unmaintained or deprecated and they force downgrade on
the newly stable dev-python/twisted*-8.1.0
dev-python/twibber is also unmaintained and
18 matches
Mail list logo
