On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 11:05:47PM -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 12:50:40AM -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > Hi Folks,
> >
> > At some point over this weekend (we haven't pinned an exact time yet,
> > details to follow), there's going to be a ~5-minute outage of overla
Hi folks,
While fixing bug #240060 I touched fox.eclass.
In the process, I updated the eclass to
* use versionator
* cut support for fox-1.0 (loong outdated)
* cut support for fox-1.5
* use eautomake instead of =automake-1.4*
* use emake instead of make
* use elog instead
I see packages like bison, flex, perl or sed in the system set. And i also see
ebuilds depending on
them. I also heard from Peter Volkov (pva) that there where discussions about
removing different
packages from the system set. So now my question is:
Should we depend on all system packages? Shoul
Thomas Sachau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Sun, 12 Oct 2008 19:04:21 +0200:
> I see packages like bison, flex, perl or sed in the system set. And i
> also see ebuilds depending on them. I also heard from Peter Volkov (pva)
> that there where discussions about
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2008-10-12 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
dev-tex/vntex 2008-10-06 19:53:29 aballier
media-sound/gogo2008-10-08 16:08:15 mr_bones_
www-apps/xrms
Peter Volkov wrote:
> Robert Buchholz ?:
>> Thilo Bangert wrote:
>> > HOMEPAGE="http://this-package-has-no-homepage.gentoo.org/";
>>
>> Why not use our package site for this, i.e.
>> HOMEPAGE="http://packages.gentoo.org/package/${CAT}/${PN}";
>
> This is not homepage. HOMEPAGE should point t
Ryan Hill wrote:
> Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Ryan Hill wrote:
>> > Though I'm still not sure what happens when a package is in two
>> > unrelated sets..
>> >
>> > @gnome:
>> >RDEPEND=">=gnome-extra/gnome-screensaver-2.22.2"
>> >
>> > @xfce4:
>> >RDEPEND="gnome-extra/gnome-
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> On Mon, 06 Oct 2008, Jorge Manuel B S Vicetto wrote:
>
>> No objections here, just a question. Do you know if the issue with the
>> lp:// sources has been fixed in bzr?
>
No objections, a minor point wrt bash:
EBZR_OPTIONS="${EBZR_OPTIONS:-}" (and similar variants)
d
Thomas Sachau wrote:
> what about this:
> insinto /usr/share/doc/${P}/examples
Is there any chance we can start using correctly quoted filenames across the
board?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] NB: I'm raising this as a talking-point, not pushing it as an
agenda,
so please don't reply if discussion doesn't
Jeremy Olexa wrote:
> Fabian Groffen wrote:
>
>> Most notably, in Prefix all keywords are full GLEP53 style, which
>> results in e.g. amd64-linux. We did this on purpose, because in Prefix
>> we don't necessarily are on Gentoo Linux. We also chose to expand fbsd,
>> nbsd and obsd to their long
> On Mon, 13 Oct 2008, Steve Long wrote:
> No objections, a minor point wrt bash:
> EBZR_OPTIONS="${EBZR_OPTIONS:-}" (and similar variants)
> doesn't do anything (beyond waste lex and yacc time.)
It does something, namely assigns an empty string if the variable was
undefined before. ;-) git.
11 matches
Mail list logo
