[gentoo-dev] Re: packages up for grabs

2008-11-09 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
Daniel Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: dev-dotnet/evolution-sharp I was going to ask you about this last week, I guess I'll look into it (although it makes me feel dirty to work with .NET stuff, I've been working with worse stuff :P). -- Diego Flameeyes Pettenò http://blog.flameeyes.eu/

Re: [gentoo-dev] DEFAULT_* proposal

2008-11-09 Thread Peter Volkov
В Сбт, 08/11/2008 в 17:20 -0500, Thomas Anderson пишет: This is a reposting of a call for discussion on DEFAULT_* variables. The original discussion was at [1]. How does this proposal answers concerns raised during last discussion? I did my best and reread all the discussions and both

Re: [gentoo-dev] DEFAULT_* proposal

2008-11-09 Thread Thomas Anderson
On Sun, Nov 09, 2008 at 03:39:12PM +0300, Peter Volkov wrote: В Сбт, 08/11/2008 в 17:20 -0500, Thomas Anderson пишет: This is a reposting of a call for discussion on DEFAULT_* variables. The original discussion was at [1]. 1. Functions we have now are much more flexible then proposed arrays.

Re: [gentoo-dev] DEFAULT_* proposal

2008-11-09 Thread Santiago M. Mola
Hello, El dom, 09-11-2008 a las 15:39 +0300, Peter Volkov escribió: 1. Functions we have now are much more flexible then proposed arrays. Do I need to think of some example of code that is impossible to do with arrays but still possible with functions? The same concern was raised in the

Re: [gentoo-dev] DEFAULT_* proposal

2008-11-09 Thread Peter Volkov
Well for myself I found compromise. Although in both proposals as I see you've omitted part where you'll discuss how you are going to implement this feature, implementing this feature as eclass addresses most of my concerns, since: 1. ebuild's syntax does not change 2. people will have to inherit

Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposed change to base.eclass: EAPI-2 support

2008-11-09 Thread Peter Alfredsen
On Sunday 02 November 2008, Peter Alfredsen wrote: The attached patch for bug 238753 makes base.eclass support EAPI 2 functions. Applied -- /PA signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[gentoo-dev] Please review: function epunt_la_files for eutils.eclass

2008-11-09 Thread Peter Alfredsen
I attach here a proposed new function for eutils.eclass. Review requested. Thanks to zlin and igli for initial review and suggestions on #gentoo-dev-help. -- /PA --- /usr/portage/eclass/eutils.eclass 2008-09-28 07:06:15.0 +0200 +++ eutils1.eclass 2008-11-06 22:22:51.0 +0100 @@

Re: [gentoo-dev] Please review: function epunt_la_files for eutils.eclass

2008-11-09 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 09-11-2008 18:04:05 +0200, Peter Alfredsen wrote: + # If this is a non-ELF system, chances are good that the .la files will be needed. + if type -P scanelf /dev/null I think this is a not so cool way to check for an ELF system. + then + debug-print Scanelf

Re: [gentoo-dev] Please review: function epunt_la_files for eutils.eclass

2008-11-09 Thread Peter Alfredsen
On Sunday 09 November 2008, Fabian Groffen wrote: On 09-11-2008 18:04:05 +0200, Peter Alfredsen wrote: + # If this is a non-ELF system, chances are good that the .la files will be needed. + if type -P scanelf /dev/null I think this is a not so cool way to check for an ELF system.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Please review: function epunt_la_files for eutils.eclass

2008-11-09 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 09-11-2008 18:34:31 +0200, Peter Alfredsen wrote: On Sunday 09 November 2008, Fabian Groffen wrote: On 09-11-2008 18:04:05 +0200, Peter Alfredsen wrote: + # If this is a non-ELF system, chances are good that the .la files will be needed. + if type -P scanelf /dev/null I think

Re: [gentoo-dev] Please review: function epunt_la_files for eutils.eclass

2008-11-09 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 09-11-2008 19:46:12 +0200, Peter Alfredsen wrote: Ok. What worries me though is that this would result in some systems having libtool files whereas the majority does not. E.g. removing them apparently fixes a problem that then crops up on those systems or something. Can't think of

[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2008-11-09 23h59 UTC

2008-11-09 Thread Robin H. Johnson
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed from the tree, for the week ending 2008-11-09 23h59 UTC. Removals: net-dns/resolvconf-gentoo 2008-11-03 13:04:40 armin76 x11-misc/obpager2008-11-03 23:46:13 darkside x11-themes/lxappearance

Re: [gentoo-dev] Please review: function epunt_la_files for eutils.eclass

2008-11-09 Thread Peter Alfredsen
On Sunday 09 November 2008, Fabian Groffen wrote: You could identify ELF a bit more reliable by running file on e.g. ${ROOT}/bin/bash, or just by building a list of CHOSTs that you know are ELF systems. D'oh, should have thought of that. See attached patch. + debug-print