On Monday 17 November 2008 18:14:02 Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò) writes:
> > Fun, I didn't really notice it was an epatch specific code that failed,
> > I know it fails when the paths don't add up between systems and I
> > thought that was it.. Ok
can people who feel adventurous unmask sandbox-1.3.2 and give it a spin on
their systems before i unmask it for everyone ...
if you hit a bug, use bugzilla mmkay
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Thursday 16 October 2008 03:27:29 Duft Markus wrote:
> Now some package of mine in a local overlay requires bison and flex.
> It's quite hard to get those to build _and_ work on winnt, so I though
> about splitting the bison ebuilds in dev-util/bison and
> dev-libs/bison-runtime (and the same fo
On Monday 06 October 2008 16:07:14 Jeremy Olexa wrote:
> Does it *really* matter if these under-staffed "odd" arches
> have a stable tree or not? If there is a problem with a stable package
> right now, will there be a new version marked stable in a reasonable
> amount of time? I think we can concl
Mike Frysinger wrote:
can people who feel adventurous unmask sandbox-1.3.2 and give it a spin on
their systems before i unmask it for everyone ...
if you hit a bug, use bugzilla mmkay
-mike
I pulled the latest git sources about a week ago and seemed like I hit a
regression in the autoconf..
On Sunday 07 December 2008 04:41:09 C. Bergström wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > can people who feel adventurous unmask sandbox-1.3.2 and give it a spin
> > on their systems before i unmask it for everyone ...
> >
> > if you hit a bug, use bugzilla mmkay
>
> I pulled the latest git sources about
On Sat, 6 Dec 2008 23:44:40 -0800
Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I hadn't heard of it before, thanks for the ref. What was the reason
> for forking the codebase? It gets pretty annoying to copy across
> useful changes, especially while eselect is stuck in svn.
Ease of getting things
Mike Frysinger wrote:
can people who feel adventurous unmask sandbox-1.3.2 and give it a spin on
their systems before i unmask it for everyone ...
Thanks for looking after this important package. 1.3.2 isn't in CVS, did
you mean 1.3.1?
Daniel
On Sunday 07 December 2008 12:34:29 Daniel Drake wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > can people who feel adventurous unmask sandbox-1.3.2 and give it a spin
> > on their systems before i unmask it for everyone ...
>
> Thanks for looking after this important package. 1.3.2 isn't in CVS, did
> you mea
ive gone through all the pending gcc-4.3.2 stuff that i see. if i missed a
bug (that has a fix readily available), then let me know soonish ... i'll be
pushing gcc-4.3.2-r1 in a bit.
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2008-12-07 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
media-sound/cantus 2008-12-01 06:16:47 ssuominen
media-sound/workman 2008-12-01 06:16:47 ssuominen
www-apps/phpcollab
On P, 2008-12-07 at 12:03 +, Mike Frysinger (vapier) wrote:
> vapier 08/12/07 12:03:34
>
> Modified: libxml2-2.7.2-r1.ebuild
ChangeLog entires are mandatory without any exceptions for
stabilizations. Don't touch packages I co-maintain without a ChangeLog
entry if it's not a
On P, 2008-12-07 at 12:07 +, Mike Frysinger (vapier) wrote:
> vapier 08/12/07 12:07:53
>
> Modified: libIDL-0.8.10.ebuild
ChangeLog entires are mandatory without any exceptions for
stabilizations. Don't touch packages I co-maintain without a ChangeLog
entry if it's not a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Following the processing of wltjr's retirement, the following packages
have been reassigned to maintainer-needed and can take some love. You
know the drill, so if you want to maintain any of them please add
yourself to the metadata.xml.
dev-db/firebir
14 matches
Mail list logo
