[gentoo-dev] Re: headless herds

2009-03-23 Thread Ryan Hill
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 06:55:48 +0100 Jeroen Roovers j...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 17:55:38 -0600 Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote: These herds have no members: ... live-cd: app-admin/pwgen app-arch/pbzip2 app-misc/livecd-tools dev-python/pyparted

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: please stop using foo-${PV}-bar.patch in other ebuild versions than ${PV}

2009-03-23 Thread Alin Năstac
On 3/23/09 1:42 AM, Ryan Hill wrote: On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 01:19:26 +0100 Alin Năstac mrn...@gentoo.org wrote: Fine, then remove $PV from patch name and use it in any ebuild version you want. Or just decouple the patch version from the ebuild version (foo-bar-r1.patch sounds OK to me).

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: please stop using foo-${PV}-bar.patch in other ebuild versions than ${PV}

2009-03-23 Thread Alin Năstac
On 3/23/09 1:44 AM, Jeremy Olexa wrote: Alin Năstac wrote: snip Fine, then remove $PV from patch name and use it in any ebuild version you want. Or just decouple the patch version from the ebuild version (foo-bar-r1.patch sounds OK to me). What exactly is your problem that you are trying

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for March 26

2009-03-23 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Sonntag, den 22.03.2009, 20:38 + schrieb Ciaran McCreesh: On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 21:18:52 +0100 Donnie Berkholz dberkh...@gentoo.org wrote: If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even vote on, let us know! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole Gentoo dev list

[gentoo-dev] newins - for standard input?

2009-03-23 Thread Ulrich Mueller
Now that dosed is going to be banned, what would people think of newins (and the other new* commands) accepting - as the first argument? I don't know how many usage cases there are, but the following are obvious: sed 's/quux/quuux/' foo | newins - foo It would allow for here documents:

[gentoo-dev] Re: please stop using foo-${PV}-bar.patch in other ebuild versions than ${PV}

2009-03-23 Thread Ryan Hill
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 09:04:32 +0100 Alin Năstac mrn...@gentoo.org wrote: I suppose what everyone does in their part of the tree is their business, but a small subset of packages I maintain have other maintainers as well. It is annoying to see rules you assume being respected on your ebuilds

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] git.eclass / subversion.eclass support for http proxy

2009-03-23 Thread Timothy Redaelli
Hi, Some repositories has the git (or svn) and http support. I saw that we choose the git/svn one (it's faster i know, but it does not works under proxy). I propose a E{GIT,SVN}_REPO_HTTP_URI (or similar) variable that uses the http variant when the global use is set (or we can use the

Re: [gentoo-dev] newins - for standard input?

2009-03-23 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Montag, den 23.03.2009, 09:22 +0100 schrieb Ulrich Mueller: Now that dosed is going to be banned, what would people think of newins (and the other new* commands) accepting - as the first argument? I don't know how many usage cases there are, but the following are obvious: sed

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: please stop using foo-${PV}-bar.patch in other ebuild versions than ${PV}

2009-03-23 Thread Sebastian Pipping
Ryan Hill wrote: Alin Năstac mrn...@gentoo.org wrote: I suppose what everyone does in their part of the tree is their business, but a small subset of packages I maintain have other maintainers as well. It is annoying to see rules you assume being respected on your ebuilds being broken at

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] git.eclass / subversion.eclass support for http proxy

2009-03-23 Thread Sebastian Pipping
Timothy Redaelli wrote: Hi, Some repositories has the git (or svn) and http support. I saw that we choose the git/svn one (it's faster i know, but it does not works under proxy). I propose a E{GIT,SVN}_REPO_HTTP_URI (or similar) variable that uses the http Good idea. variant when the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: please stop using foo-${PV}-bar.patch in other ebuild versions than ${PV}

2009-03-23 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 23-03-2009 11:41:08 +0100, Sebastian Pipping wrote: People split into three groups: - Friends of ${P}-fix-issue.patch naming - Friends of ${PN}-fix-issue.patch naming - Friends of ${PN}-1.2.3-fix-issue.patch naming Qualities [snip] I think what's missing is the following

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: please stop using foo-${PV}-bar.patch in other ebuild versions than ${PV}

2009-03-23 Thread Sebastian Pipping
Fabian Groffen wrote: I think what's missing is the following observation: ${PN}-fix-issue.patch naming is bad if you patch code that is (likely) to change in newer releases. This is almost always the case. Ultimate example, patch something in ffmpeg or mplayer, and the next snapshot will

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for March 26

2009-03-23 Thread Robert Buchholz
On Monday 23 March 2009, Tiziano Müller wrote: Spec needed. DOCS or no DOCS? DOCS, and non-empty default value, please [1]. Some eclasses already do this (not base, but others), and if that default doesn't cover it for you, the function can be overridden. Concerning the argument of declarative

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: EAPI roadmap

2009-03-23 Thread Thilo Bangert
Serkan Kaba ser...@gentoo.org said: Thilo Bangert yazmış: i doesnt make sense to introduce EAPI=2 into ebuilds, if we dont expect to have en EAPI=2 capable package manager stable within a reasonable timeframe. 2.1.6 is stable and supports EAPI2 thats pretty cool. thanks...

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] git.eclass / subversion.eclass support for http proxy

2009-03-23 Thread Nirbheek Chauhan
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Timothy Redaelli dri...@gentoo.org wrote: Hi, Some repositories has the git (or svn) and http support. I saw that we choose the git/svn one (it's faster i know, but it does not works under proxy). I propose a E{GIT,SVN}_REPO_HTTP_URI (or similar) variable that

Re: [gentoo-dev] newins - for standard input?

2009-03-23 Thread Nirbheek Chauhan
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote: Now that dosed is going to be banned, what would people think of I wouldn't call it banned, rather useless since everyone directly uses sed instead. -- ~Nirbheek Chauhan

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Last rites: dev-lang/pugs

2009-03-23 Thread Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Torsten Veller wrote: # Masked for removal (#151986,#171649,#239222) (23 Mar 2009) # 151986 - dev-lang/pugs-6.2.13 installs stuff in /lib instead of /usr/lib # 171649 - dev-lang/pugs-6.2.13 fails to build with ghc-6.6 # 239222 - Remove

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] git.eclass / subversion.eclass support for http proxy

2009-03-23 Thread Timothy Redaelli
On Monday 23 March 2009 12:45:55 Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Timothy Redaelli dri...@gentoo.org wrote: Hi, Some repositories has the git (or svn) and http support. I saw that we choose the git/svn one (it's faster i know, but it does not works under proxy).

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2009-03-23 Thread Peter Alfredsen
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 11:26:06 -0100 Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto jmbsvice...@gentoo.org wrote: [...] Saleem Abdulrasool (compnerd) [...] dev-dotnet/dbus-glib-sharp dev-dotnet/dbus-sharp [...] Snatched

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2009-03-23 Thread Ricardo Mendoza
2009/3/24 Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto jmbsvice...@gentoo.org: Hi. Following this month processing of the retirement batch, the following packages have been reassigned to maintainer-needed and can take some love. You know the drill, so if you want to maintain any of them please add yourself

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2009-03-23 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le lundi 23 mars 2009 à 11:26 -0100, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto a écrit : dev-libs/gdl gnome-extra/gsynaptics will be taken by gnome. * gdl will die soonish because it's been integrated in anjuta proper iirc. * gsynaptics will die soonish anyway due to xorg-server 1.6 and

[gentoo-dev] [undertakers] Packages with updated metadata.xml

2009-03-23 Thread Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi. Following this month processing of the retirement batch, the following packages had their metadata.xml updated to remove all maintainers that were retired. If you are a maintainer or a member of a herd listed in these packages, you may want to

Re: [gentoo-dev] newins - for standard input?

2009-03-23 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 09:22:06 +0100 Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote: Now that dosed is going to be banned, what would people think of newins (and the other new* commands) accepting - as the first argument? There's a slightly different variation in exheres-0: as well as do* and new*,

Re: [gentoo-dev] updating baselayout PERMS_PROTECT

2009-03-23 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 23:53:23 -0400 Caleb Cushing xenoterrac...@gmail.com wrote: of course this leads to the problem... what if the 'admin' explicitly changed the permissions... Maybe we should have something like PERMS_PROTECT (similar to config_protect). where portage won't update the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2009-03-23 Thread Alex Legler
On Mo, 2009-03-23 at 11:26 -0100, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: [...] Ali Polatel (hawking) [...] net-irc/bip Shamelessly stole that one. Gracias, Alex signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] newins - for standard input?

2009-03-23 Thread Ulrich Mueller
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: Now that dosed is going to be banned, what would people think of newins (and the other new* commands) accepting - as the first argument? There's a slightly different variation in exheres-0: as well as do* and new*, there's also here*, which you

Re: [gentoo-dev] newins - for standard input?

2009-03-23 Thread Timothy Redaelli
On Monday 23 March 2009 09:22:06 Ulrich Mueller wrote: Now that dosed is going to be banned, what would people think of newins (and the other new* commands) accepting - as the first argument? I don't know how many usage cases there are, but the following are obvious: sed 's/quux/quuux/'

Re: [gentoo-dev] newins - for standard input?

2009-03-23 Thread Michael Haubenwallner
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 17:11 +0100, Timothy Redaelli wrote: On Monday 23 March 2009 09:22:06 Ulrich Mueller wrote: newins - baz $'# a short\n# file' Why can't you use newins /dev/stdin foo that it works out of the box? Nope, /dev/stdin isn't portable. While Linux and Solaris have it,

[gentoo-dev] Re: Last rites: dev-lang/pugs

2009-03-23 Thread Torsten Veller
* Marijn Schouten (hkBst) hk...@gentoo.org: Torsten Veller wrote: # Masked for removal (#151986,#171649,#239222) (23 Mar 2009) # 151986 - dev-lang/pugs-6.2.13 installs stuff in /lib instead of /usr/lib # 171649 - dev-lang/pugs-6.2.13 fails to build with ghc-6.6 # 239222 - Remove

Re: [gentoo-dev] newins - for standard input?

2009-03-23 Thread Alec Warner
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 8:41 AM, Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote: On Mon, 23 Mar 2009, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: Now that dosed is going to be banned, what would people think of newins (and the other new* commands) accepting - as the first argument? There's a slightly different variation

Re: [gentoo-dev] [undertakers] Packages with updated metadata.xml

2009-03-23 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 12:28 -0100, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: dev-ruby/coderay dev-ruby/exifr dev-ruby/png The ruby herd will take these. Kind regards, Hans signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[gentoo-dev] Re: please stop using foo-${PV}-bar.patch in other ebuild versions than ${PV}

2009-03-23 Thread Ryan Hill
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 11:51:28 +0100 Fabian Groffen grob...@gentoo.org wrote: On 23-03-2009 11:41:08 +0100, Sebastian Pipping wrote: People split into three groups: - Friends of ${P}-fix-issue.patch naming - Friends of ${PN}-fix-issue.patch naming - Friends of

Re: [gentoo-dev] please stop using foo-${PV}-bar.patch in other ebuild versions than ${PV}

2009-03-23 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Dne neděle 22 Březen 2009 17:50:26 Alin Năstac napsal(a): Please do not apply patches that have ${P} prefix in other ebuild versions than ${PV}. Is that hard to create a new patch with a proper name? Cheers, Alin Hi, I was working on patches glep [1] (nothing final and it is highly in

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: genstef gems special edition

2009-03-23 Thread Peter Alfredsen
Since genstef has been .away for some time, I arranged with him that I'd send a list of his ebuilds that need maintenance to be put up for grabs. This list contains all ebuilds that have no herd, at least one open bug and where genstef is the maintainer. media-video/linux-uvc

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: genstef gems special edition

2009-03-23 Thread Markos Chandras
On Tuesday 24 March 2009 00:08:53 Peter Alfredsen wrote: Since genstef has been .away for some time, I arranged with him that I'd send a list of his ebuilds that need maintenance to be put up for grabs. This list contains all ebuilds that have no herd, at least one open bug and where genstef

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: genstef gems special edition

2009-03-23 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le lundi 23 mars 2009 à 23:08 +0100, Peter Alfredsen a écrit : Since genstef has been .away for some time, I arranged with him that I'd send a list of his ebuilds that need maintenance to be put up for grabs. This list contains all ebuilds that have no herd, at least one open bug and where

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] prefix portage chaining

2009-03-23 Thread Markus Duft
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 08:27 +0100, Markus Duft wrote: On Fri, 2009-03-20 at 12:11 +0100, Markus Duft wrote: On Fri, 2009-03-20 at 11:35 +0100, Markus Duft wrote: Hey guys :) Just wanted to stop by and get some opinions on a patch i wrote for the prefix branch. [snip] Hey