[gentoo-dev] NOTICE default-linux/amd64/{2007.0,dev} profiles has been moved to /dev/null

2009-08-01 Thread Samuli Suominen
It was about 7 months since these was deprecated, and there was no pparent upgrade path issues. They are now gone. Thanks, Samuli

[gentoo-dev] 2009.0 profiles

2009-08-01 Thread Ben de Groot
We've been living with the 2008.0 profiles for a while now. I think the time has come for 2009.0 profiles so we can have some updates. Also, there are plans for an anniversary release of our LiveCD, so I think the time is right to start working on a new set of profiles. One reason I bring this up

Re: [gentoo-dev] Keeping profiles/ tidy

2009-08-01 Thread Nirbheek Chauhan
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 9:11 PM, Samuli Suominenssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote: I've just closed http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105016. But bugs like these shouldn't be around in the first place. When you remove a package from tree, please grep the profiles/ directory for matching entries

[gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for August

2009-08-01 Thread Mike Frysinger
This is your monthly friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically the 2nd Thursday at 2000 UTC / 1600 EST), same bat channel (#gentoo-council @ irc.freenode.net) ! If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole

Re: [gentoo-dev] 2009.0 profiles

2009-08-01 Thread AllenJB
Ben de Groot wrote: We've been living with the 2008.0 profiles for a while now. I think the time has come for 2009.0 profiles so we can have some updates. Also, there are plans for an anniversary release of our LiveCD, so I think the time is right to start working on a new set of profiles.

[gentoo-dev] Inclusion of speech support on Gentoo release Media

2009-08-01 Thread Keith Hinton
Hi, It has been quite some time sinse I've found time to be on an Internet connection to post, so: I'm just posting to find out how discussions on adding app-accessibility/speakup, etc, to Gentoo release media is going, and to find out if the Gentoo release team has plans for including this for

Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for August

2009-08-01 Thread Sebastian Pipping
Mike Frysinger wrote: If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole Gentoo dev list to see. I would love to see the GLEP on CPE names in metadata.xml discussed,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Keeping profiles/ tidy

2009-08-01 Thread Petteri Räty
Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 9:11 PM, Samuli Suominenssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote: I've just closed http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105016. But bugs like these shouldn't be around in the first place. When you remove a package from tree, please grep the profiles/

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] xfconf.eclass - codename: keep it simple, stupid

2009-08-01 Thread Samuli Suominen
Right now, xfce ebuilds in tree are unmaintainable because: - Eclass sets invalid license to pkgs, they all have different ones, GPL-2, LGPL-2*, GPL-3, BSD - Ebuilds have started using internal functions from both xfce44 and xfce4 eclasses. Yes, some Xfce 4.6 ebuilds are still using

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] xfconf.eclass - codename: keep it simple, stupid

2009-08-01 Thread Samuli Suominen
Samuli Suominen wrote: Please comment if there's something to change. Keep it simple. Improved version attached. EAPI checking modification. Thanks, Samuli # Copyright 1999-2009 Gentoo Foundation # Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2 # $Header: $ # @ECLASS:

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] xfconf.eclass - codename: keep it simple, stupid

2009-08-01 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sat, 01 Aug 2009 20:58:10 +0300 Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote: Improved version attached. EAPI checking modification. 2) EXPF+= src_configure ;; += is bash 3.1, which isn't legal for use in the tree. -- Ciaran McCreesh signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Support for multiple ABIs (for Python modules etc.)

2009-08-01 Thread Paul de Vrieze
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesisarfre...@gentoo.org wrote: 2009-07-26 14:40:13 Marijn Schouten (hkBst) napisał(a): Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: I would like to present the plan of support for multiple ABIs. It should be sufficient for

Re: [gentoo-dev] 2009.0 profiles

2009-08-01 Thread Zac Medico
AllenJB wrote: Ben de Groot wrote: We've been living with the 2008.0 profiles for a while now. I think the time has come for 2009.0 profiles so we can have some updates. Also, there are plans for an anniversary release of our LiveCD, so I think the time is right to start working on a new set

Re: [gentoo-dev] Support for multiple ABIs (for Python modules etc.)

2009-08-01 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sat, 25 Jul 2009 12:28:44 +0200 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfre...@gentoo.org wrote: I would like to present the plan of support for multiple ABIs. It should be sufficient for Python modules and might be also appropriate for some other ABI types (e.g. for Ruby modules). How do you

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] xfconf.eclass - codename: keep it simple, stupid

2009-08-01 Thread Samuli Suominen
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Sat, 01 Aug 2009 20:58:10 +0300 Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote: Improved version attached. EAPI checking modification. 2) EXPF+= src_configure ;; += is bash 3.1, which isn't legal for use in the tree. It's been in use for a long time in xfce's

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] xfconf.eclass - codename: keep it simple, stupid

2009-08-01 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 01-08-2009 21:26:09 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote: Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Sat, 01 Aug 2009 20:58:10 +0300 Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote: Improved version attached. EAPI checking modification. 2) EXPF+= src_configure ;; += is bash 3.1, which isn't legal for use

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] xfconf.eclass - codename: keep it simple, stupid

2009-08-01 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sat, 01 Aug 2009 21:26:09 +0300 Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote: += is bash 3.1, which isn't legal for use in the tree. It's been in use for a long time in xfce's ebuilds already, noone has ever complained. One can easily match some hundreds of ebuilds in tree where it's used.

[gentoo-dev] Re: Progress on Universal Select Tool

2009-08-01 Thread Sérgio Almeida
Hello all, Once again, another productive week. This week's work focused mostly on profiles. Uprofile's implementation exceeded my expectations and was much easier than what I thought it would be, the reason: uselect's simple api. What's working on uprofile: * uprofile when called with no

Re: [gentoo-dev] Keeping profiles/ tidy

2009-08-01 Thread Nirbheek Chauhan
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 7:32 PM, Petteri Rätybetelge...@gentoo.org wrote: Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: This seems like something that should be added to the ebuild/end quiz. Ebuild quiz: 19. What is the procedure for removing packages from the tree? Looking back, my answer to that question was

Re: [gentoo-dev] Keeping profiles/ tidy

2009-08-01 Thread Samuli Suominen
Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 7:32 PM, Petteri Rätybetelge...@gentoo.org wrote: Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: This seems like something that should be added to the ebuild/end quiz. Ebuild quiz: 19. What is the procedure for removing packages from the tree? Looking back, my

[gentoo-dev] Gentoo stats server/client @ 2009-08-02

2009-08-01 Thread Sebastian Pipping
Hello again! Just a few quick updates. By now the server side accepts Gentoo-specific data from the client (transfered as JSON) and updates that machine's previous submission in the database. (That's not as trivial as it may sound at first.) As a single submission produces a few thousand