[gentoo-dev] make install without die (gentoo-x86 commit in app-arch/hardlink, app-arch/duff )

2009-10-23 Thread Torsten Veller
* Robin H. Johnson (robbat2) robb...@gentoo.org: 1.1 app-arch/hardlink/hardlink-0.1.1.ebuild file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/app-arch/hardlink/hardlink-0.1.1.ebuild?rev=1.1view=markup plain:

[gentoo-dev] eapi files and profiles

2009-10-23 Thread Samuli Suominen
So I was told Council needs to approve inheritance of eapi files from parent profiles? I'm not sure why, because we shouldn't have any files in default/linux/ which was decided long ago when the new profiles was introduced... gentoo-x86/profiles/default/linux $ find ./ -name eapi | wc -l 63

Re: [gentoo-dev] eapi files and profiles

2009-10-23 Thread Ulrich Mueller
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009, Samuli Suominen wrote: So I was told Council needs to approve inheritance of eapi files from parent profiles? Doesn't http://bugs.gentoo.org/288320#c7 cover this? Why would you need explicit inheritance? And which EAPI should be taken, if you have more than one parent

Re: [gentoo-dev] make install without die (gentoo-x86 commit in app-arch/hardlink, app-arch/duff )

2009-10-23 Thread Victor Ostorga
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 09:28:47 +0200 Torsten Veller ml...@veller.net wrote: * Robin H. Johnson (robbat2) robb...@gentoo.org: 1.1 app-arch/hardlink/hardlink-0.1.1.ebuild file :

Re: [gentoo-dev] make install without die (gentoo-x86 commit in app-arch/hardlink, app-arch/duff )

2009-10-23 Thread Justin
Torsten Veller wrote: * Robin H. Johnson (robbat2) robb...@gentoo.org: 1.1 app-arch/hardlink/hardlink-0.1.1.ebuild file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/app-arch/hardlink/hardlink-0.1.1.ebuild?rev=1.1view=markup plain:

[gentoo-dev] Amount of useflags enabled by default

2009-10-23 Thread Thomas Sachau
Hi, i would like to start a discussion about reducing the amount of default-enabled USE flags in profiles, especially in inherited basic profiles. Is there any policy, when they are added, how the reason for addition is documented and when they are removed from profiles? In addition, i see a

[gentoo-dev] Re: make install without die (gentoo-x86 commit in app-arch/hardlink, app-arch/duff )

2009-10-23 Thread Justin Bronder
On 23/10/09 09:28 +0200, Torsten Veller wrote: An imprecise search (/make .*install$/) revealed another 200 packages: http://dev.gentoo.org/~tove/files/makeinstallwithoutdie.txt Let it die before replacing a working package with a broken one. Thanks Fixed:

[gentoo-dev] Re: make install without die (gentoo-x86 commit in app-arch/hardlink, app-arch/duff )

2009-10-23 Thread Jonathan Callen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Torsten Veller wrote: An imprecise search (/make .*install$/) revealed another 200 packages: http://dev.gentoo.org/~tove/files/makeinstallwithoutdie.txt Let it die before replacing a working package with a broken one. Removed from tree:

Re: [gentoo-dev] Amount of useflags enabled by default

2009-10-23 Thread Sebastian Pipping
Thomas Sachau wrote: In addition, i see a trend to enabled more more more USE flags (either over profiles or via IUSE +flag). I'm not sure for how much of the IUSE=+foo cases this applies but I can explain one of them: In xfce-base/xfce4-session-4.6.1-r1 there is +fortune in IUSE because

Re: [gentoo-dev] Amount of useflags enabled by default

2009-10-23 Thread Petteri Räty
Thomas Sachau wrote: In addition, i see a trend to enabled more more more USE flags (either over profiles or via IUSE +flag). Whats the reason for forcing a big load of default enabled USE flags on every user including more dependencies, more compile time, more wasted disk space and more

Re: [gentoo-dev] eapi files and profiles

2009-10-23 Thread Petteri Räty
Ulrich Mueller wrote: On Fri, 23 Oct 2009, Samuli Suominen wrote: So I was told Council needs to approve inheritance of eapi files from parent profiles? Doesn't http://bugs.gentoo.org/288320#c7 cover this? Why would you need explicit inheritance? Well technically you still shouldn't

Re: [gentoo-dev] eapi files and profiles

2009-10-23 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 23:26:47 +0300 Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org wrote: Well technically you still shouldn't add EAPI 2 atoms to the child profiles without them being marked with the appropriate eapi file entry. Do all the levels of 10.0 profiles use EAPI 2 entries? Down that way leads

Re: [gentoo-dev] eapi files and profiles

2009-10-23 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 11:24:27 +0300 Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote: So I was told Council needs to approve inheritance of eapi files from parent profiles? As a full explanation of why this idea sucks, since some people have asked: You need to decide which way eapi inherits go. Are

Re: [gentoo-dev] eapi files and profiles

2009-10-23 Thread Brian Harring
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 11:24:27AM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote: So I was told Council needs to approve inheritance of eapi files from parent profiles? I'm not sure why, because we shouldn't have any files in default/linux/ which was decided long ago when the new profiles was introduced...

Re: [gentoo-dev] Amount of useflags enabled by default

2009-10-23 Thread Alistair Bush
Hi, i would like to start a discussion about reducing the amount of default-enabled USE flags in profiles, especially in inherited basic profiles. Sounds like a reasonable idea to me, for the base profiles at least. In addition, i see a trend to enabled more more more USE flags (either