Re: [gentoo-dev] Removing kde-base/arts from tree.

2009-11-11 Thread volkmar
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 12:14:41AM +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote: Here's _somewhat_ complete list of ebuilds that have a depend on kde-base/arts, excluding those that are masked for other reasons or ones that I plan on handling myself. [..] media-video/vlc-0.9.10:arts There is a bug with

Re: [gentoo-dev] Removing kde-base/arts from tree.

2009-11-11 Thread Samuli Suominen
Samuli Suominen wrote: Here's _somewhat_ complete list of ebuilds that have a depend on kde-base/arts, excluding those that are masked for other reasons or ones that I plan on handling myself. And the unreasonable goal is done. kde-base/arts is masked, remaining unmasked ebuilds fixed, and

[gentoo-dev] =kde-base/kdelibs-3* removal, bug 292791

2009-11-11 Thread Samuli Suominen
Goal is to have =kdelibs-3* out of tree by this year, and get autoconf-2.64 keyworded for ~arch. See the bug in $summary, and open bugs as you see needed. Thanks, Samuli

Re: [gentoo-dev] =kde-base/kdelibs-3* removal, bug 292791

2009-11-11 Thread likewhoa
Nice, kde3 deprecation removal is in full effect. You rock Samuli! On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 17:32 +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote: Goal is to have =kdelibs-3* out of tree by this year, and get autoconf-2.64 keyworded for ~arch. See the bug in $summary, and open bugs as you see needed. Thanks,

Re: [gentoo-dev] QA: package.mask policies

2009-11-11 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Sun, 8 Nov 2009 18:20:00 +0100 Tomáš Chvátal scarab...@gentoo.org wrote: But if we look on tag of screen-4.0.3 or its release: screen-4.0.2.tar.gz27-Jan-2004 05:46 821K screen-4.0.2.tar.gz.sig27-Jan-2004 05:47 65 screen-4.0.3.tar.gz07-Aug-2008 06:30 821K

[gentoo-dev] Re: QA: package.mask policies

2009-11-11 Thread Torsten Veller
Tomáš Chvátal scarab...@gentoo.org wrote: But if we look on tag of screen-4.0.3 or its release: screen-4.0.3.tar.gz07-Aug-2008 06:30 821K screen-4.0.3.tar.gz.sig07-Aug-2008 06:30 65 *screen-4.0.3 (25 Oct 2006) Part of the famous Software from the future series.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: QA: package.mask policies

2009-11-11 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:11:37 +0100 Torsten Veller ml...@veller.net wrote: Tomáš Chvátal scarab...@gentoo.org wrote: But if we look on tag of screen-4.0.3 or its release: screen-4.0.3.tar.gz07-Aug-2008 06:30 821K screen-4.0.3.tar.gz.sig07-Aug-2008 06:30 65

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo stats server/client @ 2009-08-22

2009-11-11 Thread Sebastian Pipping
Torsten Veller wrote: What's the status of the stats project? What's missing? What help is needed? Hello Torsten, thanks for your interest. Let me quote myself from a recent reply on a similar question: for the quickest summary possible these steps are needed: - make me have and take time

[gentoo-dev] [maintainer-needed] app-emulation/kvm

2009-11-11 Thread Doug Goldstein
KVM needs a maintainer. Plain and simple. If you're interested please step and and start wrangling some bugs. -- Doug Goldstein

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: redistribute intel rpms

2009-11-11 Thread Sébastien Fabbro
On Sat, 7 Nov 2009, Duncan wrote: The big combo tarball could then be restrict=mirror or whatever, with or without a specific user click-thru (and restrict=interactive or whatever) as necessary and already used on some packages, following existing policies. Of course, there's certainly the

Re: [gentoo-dev] redistribute intel rpms

2009-11-11 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Fri, Nov 06, 2009 at 05:58:09PM -0800, Sébastien Fabbro wrote: Additionally, from the base license: ] Subject to all of the terms and conditions of this Agreement and any specific ] restrictions which may appear in the Redistributables text files, Intel grants ] to you a non-exclusive,