Hello guys!
We, the Qt team, would like to include a new eclass in the tree.
The qt4-r2 eclass is meant to help with ebuilds for Qt-based (qmake-based, to
be precise) applications.
The eclass is attached, and here's a short comparison between qt4-r2 and qt4
(currently in tree) eclasses:
Hi,
in the last months my real life eated much of my time, I've tried to
fix many things but, actually, I've not much time to work on gentoo
ebuilds ...so it's time to retire.
You can send an email to czoff...@xmerlin.org if you need to contact me.
All my future work on gentoo will be
On Sunday 29 November 2009 15:54:30 Thomas Anderson wrote:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 01:46:59PM +0200, Dominik Kapusta wrote:
Hello guys!
We, the Qt team, would like to include a new eclass in the tree.
The qt4-r2 eclass is meant to help with ebuilds for Qt-based
(qmake-based, to be
On Sunday 29 November 2009 16:29:51 Dominik Kapusta wrote:
On Sunday 29 November 2009 15:54:30 Thomas Anderson wrote:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 01:46:59PM +0200, Dominik Kapusta wrote:
Hello guys!
We, the Qt team, would like to include a new eclass in the tree.
The qt4-r2 eclass is
# Diego E. Pettenò flamee...@gentoo.org (29 Nov 2009)
# on behalf of QA team
#
# Fails to build with recent kernel headers (bug #236449,
# September 2008); ignores LDFLAGS (bug #231934); has
# parallel make issues (bug #264671) and is pending version
# bump since at least April 2009 (bug
2009/11/29 Thomas Anderson tander...@gentoo.org:
I can see people using qt4-r2 just because it has -r2 (so it is newer
than qt4)
That is exactly the intended behaviour. We would break the tree if we would
simply add the new functionality to the existing qt4.eclass. And in absence
of an eclass
On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 15:56:45 +0100
Diego E. Pettenò flamee...@gmail.com wrote:
# Diego E. Pettenò flamee...@gentoo.org (29 Nov 2009)
# on behalf of QA team
#
# Fails to build with recent kernel headers (bug #236449,
# September 2008); ignores LDFLAGS (bug #231934); has
# parallel make
2009/11/29 Dawid Węgliński c...@gentoo.org:
On Sunday 29 November 2009 16:59:10 Ben de Groot wrote:
As soon as existing ebuilds in the tree are ported over to qt4-r2, the old
qt4.eclass will be removed.
As far as i remember we don't remove eclasses. Probably you meant deprecated,
but not
On Monday 30 November 2009 00:19:49 Ben de Groot wrote:
2009/11/29 Dawid Węgliński c...@gentoo.org:
On Sunday 29 November 2009 16:59:10 Ben de Groot wrote:
As soon as existing ebuilds in the tree are ported over to qt4-r2, the
old qt4.eclass will be removed.
As far as i remember we
Dne neděle 29 Listopad 2009 23:11:23 Dawid Węgliński napsal(a):
On Sunday 29 November 2009 16:59:10 Ben de Groot wrote:
As soon as existing ebuilds in the tree are ported over to qt4-r2, the
old qt4.eclass will
be removed.
As far as i remember we don't remove eclasses. Probably you meant
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2009-11-29 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
app-emulation/kvm 2009-11-23 00:03:18 cardoe
www-plugins/mozilla-weave 2009-11-25 20:53:23 volkmar
net-firewall/knetfilter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The following eclasses are not used anywhere in the tree, and as such
have been marked as deprecated, with all functionality not related to
uninstall removed (scheduled for removal on 2011/11/30, if not otherwise
noted):
aolserver.eclass
12 matches
Mail list logo
