В Пнд, 28/12/2009 в 18:41 +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan пишет:
I think we can simply follow debian and fedora's lead on this. They
have the lawyers, and
Well, it's possible but not that simple. To do this it's not enough to
compare packages, but files and patches should be compared as well (and
В Втр, 29/12/2009 в 00:24 -0500, Vincent Launchbury пишет:
File a bug with some ebuilds.
It looks like somebody already has. See
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=266157. I tested the latest
ebuild, and it worked fine (see comment #59.) What would have to be
done to get it in the main
Hi,
Joe Sapp nixpho...@gentoo.org:
Anyways, a diff would be useless so I've attached the proposed eclass
[2].
Looks fine so far. What puzzled me is the documentation of the SLOT
variable. What is the motivation to do so?
* Sometimes you give a default on undefined ROOT variable, sometimes
On Mon, 28 Dec 2009 23:31:44 +0100
Rémi Cardona r...@gentoo.org wrote:
Le 28/12/2009 22:04, Fabio Erculiani a écrit :
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 9:51 PM, David Leverton
levert...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Monday 28 December 2009 20:50:17 Fabio Erculiani wrote:
What all this has to do with
# Diego E. Pettenò flamee...@gentoo.org (29 Dec 2009)
# on behalf of QA team
#
# Another of the Jörg Schilling “fast and enhanced” unix
# tools, fails to build with glibc 2.10 (bug #298879), will
# most likely file in other ways as that is fixed. Ignore
# CFLAGS (bug #241984). Ebuild is very
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Doug Goldstein car...@gentoo.org wrote:
Then there was no need to waste everyone's time with a backhanded
comment about the X11 herd. And we can all get on with our lives.
From your perspective it might've looked like a backhanded comment,
but I know that
Am Freitag, den 25.12.2009, 19:09 +0100 schrieb Tobias Scherbaum:
Am Dienstag, den 15.12.2009, 23:36 -0100 schrieb Jorge Manuel B. S.
Vicetto:
nomination: December 17th to 30th
I'd like to nominate dev-zero.
And I accept, thanks.
--
Tiziano Müller
Gentoo Linux Developer
Areas of
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 12:02:14PM +0300, Peter Volkov wrote:
В Втр, 29/12/2009 в 00:24 -0500, Vincent Launchbury пишет:
File a bug with some ebuilds.
It looks like somebody already has. See
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=266157. I tested the latest
ebuild, and it worked fine
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
# Jonathan Callen a...@gentoo.org (29 Dec 2009)
# Project abandoned upstream (replaced by dev-util/schroot)
# Collides with dev-util/schroot[dchroot]
# Masked for removal in 30 days, bug 298874
sys-apps/dchroot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version:
Le 29/12/2009 14:43, Henry Gebhardt a écrit :
4) add a USE-flag, say devel, that, when enabled, allows
compiling programs against the package. x11-libs/libXtst would
have an RDEPEND like this:
RDEPEND=devel? x11-libs/inputproto
This doesn't solve anything. It will just annoy users as they
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 06:32:20PM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
Can we have USE-deps inside the LICENSE block then?
Yes.
~harring
pgphPPJZqEGs2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi folks,
Clutter is an opengl-based library for creating user interfaces.
http://www.clutter-project.org/
It is currently used by gnome-games-2.28.2, and GNOME 3.0 will make
extensive use of it. The Moblin project also uses clutter for parts of
it's interface.
The eclass is attached, and is
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 12:36:34AM -0500, Vincent Launchbury wrote:
1) Not all of the licenses are completely accurate. For example, the
Linux kernels are listed as soley GPL-2, yet they contain blobs of
non-free firmware.
The fact that some people claim that the firmware blobs somehow violate
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 08:16:22PM -0500, Richard Freeman wrote:
On 12/28/2009 05:53 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
You're wrong there. The kernel does contain additional licenses, and
EXPLICITLY mentions them. Go and read 'firmware/WHENCE'.
The licenses listed therein range from use-permitted
Greg KH wrote:
The fact that some people claim that the firmware blobs somehow violate
the GPLv2 license of the kernel is a claim, not a fact, so please do not
state it as such.
Hi Greg,
Thanks for your reply.
I think you misunderstood my point though. I wasn't saying that the
firmware
Hi.
I want package A to incur a rebuild of package B, due to a newly
introduced USE flag which affects B. I wish to express this in the
package's ebuild. I therefore DEPENDed A in B[use_flag]. When I attempt
to emerge A, portage offers to *upgrade* the dependency, taking in the
new USE
On 12/29/2009 08:23 AM, Amit Dor-Shifer wrote:
Hi.
I want package A to incur a rebuild of package B, due to a newly
introduced USE flag which affects B. I wish to express this in the
package's ebuild. I therefore DEPENDed A in B[use_flag]. When I attempt
to emerge A, portage offers to
Hi.
amit0 myebuilds # qlist -Iv sys-apps/portage
sys-apps/portage-2.1.6.13
I've binpkg-ed sun-jdk.
I did so w/USE+=jce:
amit0 myebuilds # qtbz2 -x
/usr/portage/packages/dev-java/sun-jdk-1.6.0.16.tbz2
amit0 myebuilds # qxpak -x
/usr/portage/packages/dev-java/sun-jdk-1.6.0.16.xpak
18 matches
Mail list logo
