[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-office/abiword-plugins: abiword-plugins-2.6.4.ebuild ChangeLog abiword-plugins-2.4.6.ebuild abiword-plugins-2.6.5.ebuild abiword-plugins-2.6.

2010-02-11 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le mercredi 10 février 2010 à 23:02 +, Samuli Suominen (ssuominen) a écrit : ssuominen10/02/10 17:41:06 Modified: ChangeLog evince-2.24.2.ebuild evince-2.26.2.ebuild evince-2.28.1.ebuild evince-2.28.2.ebuild Log: Update poppler dependency

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-office/abiword-plugins: abiword-plugins-2.6.4.ebuild ChangeLog abiword-plugins-2.4.6.ebuild abiword-plugins-2.6.5.ebuild abiword-plugins-

2010-02-11 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 02/11/2010 11:16 AM, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: Le mercredi 10 février 2010 à 23:02 +, Samuli Suominen (ssuominen) a écrit : ssuominen10/02/10 17:41:06 Modified: ChangeLog evince-2.24.2.ebuild evince-2.26.2.ebuild evince-2.28.1.ebuild

[gentoo-dev] Remove dev-status of mips profiles

2010-02-11 Thread Torsten Veller
Can we please move the mips profiles from dev to exp in profiles/profiles.desc? The ~150 mips development profiles increase the time for a `repoman -d full` run in dev-perl/ from three to five minutes. That is an increase of roughly 66 percent. repoman further prints more than 2000 lines of

Re: [gentoo-dev] Remove dev-status of mips profiles

2010-02-11 Thread Brian Harring
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 04:54:38PM +0100, Torsten Veller wrote: Can we please move the mips profiles from dev to exp in profiles/profiles.desc? The ~150 mips development profiles increase the time for a `repoman -d full` run in dev-perl/ from three to five minutes. That is an increase of

Re: [gentoo-dev] Remove dev-status of mips profiles

2010-02-11 Thread Jeremy Olexa
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:41:41 -0800, Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 04:54:38PM +0100, Torsten Veller wrote: Can we please move the mips profiles from dev to exp in profiles/profiles.desc? The ~150 mips development profiles increase the time for a `repoman

Re: [gentoo-dev] Remove dev-status of mips profiles

2010-02-11 Thread Brian Harring
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 06:56:58PM +, Jeremy Olexa wrote: I would guess that it would be far easier to work in an overlay at this point. I would also guess that if there are ANY mips users out there that they would have to use some other ACCEPT_KEYWORDS value because the shape of ~mips is

Re: [gentoo-dev] Remove dev-status of mips profiles

2010-02-11 Thread Brian Harring
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 06:56:58PM +, Jeremy Olexa wrote: At the very least if it's going to be kept around, experimental or not, the number of profiles in use there *really* needs reduction- mips has roughly 117 profiles listed in profiles.desc out of 217- literally ~54% of all

Re: [gentoo-dev] Remove dev-status of mips profiles

2010-02-11 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 02/11/2010 08:56 PM, Jeremy Olexa wrote: Can we please move the mips profiles from dev to exp in profiles/profiles.desc? The ~150 mips development profiles increase the time for a `repoman -d full` run in dev-perl/ from three to five minutes. That is an increase of roughly 66 percent.

[gentoo-dev] Developer Handbook should document how/when to touch arch profiles' files

2010-02-11 Thread Jeroen Roovers
As set out in bug #304435 [1], we should declare some policy about changes to arch profiles in devmanual or in the Developer Handbook. Basically, I would want to have this apply to arch profile changes as well: [5] http://devmanual.gentoo.org/keywording/index.html says: = Keywording on

[gentoo-dev] Re: Remove dev-status of mips profiles

2010-02-11 Thread Christian Faulhammer
Hi, Jeremy Olexa darks...@gentoo.org: I would guess that it would be far easier to work in an overlay at this point. I would also guess that if there are ANY mips users out there that they would have to use some other ACCEPT_KEYWORDS value because the shape of ~mips is so...bad. Don't