Hello,
There are some packages which were 'readded' to the Sunrise overlay
after lying unmaintained in the tree for a long time and finally being
removed. One example could be net-im/ekg2 for removal of which I've been
personally waiting.
Although such a workflow 'works' indeed, for most of the
On 06/13/2010 10:41 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
Wouldn't it be better to officially support moving unmaintained
packages directly into Sunrise? In this case by 'unmaintained' I mean
those which have open bugs assigned to 'maintainer-needed' for a long
time, and are potentially a candidates for the
Michał Górny posted on Sun, 13 Jun 2010 10:41:43 +0200 as excerpted:
Wouldn't it be better to officially support moving unmaintained packages
directly into Sunrise?
++
I've thought something like that was needed for awhile, tho I'm not sure
it fits the sunrise theme too well. But if not
On 06/11/2010 12:27 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
From my point of view, I would prefer to:
1. Mask caps for net-wireless/bluez on affected arches, letting us to
keep bluez keyworded.
2. Open two bug reports as done with current policy: one for keywording
libcap-ng and other to check bluez works
If you start moving maintainer-needed package on Sunrise then Sunrise will
end up as a garbage collector overlay having many many ebuilds that nobody
will actually maintain. If you care about maintainer-needed package then
step up and proxy maintain it. The delay ( which is not that big if you
If you care enough about this package, move it to sunrise or step up and
proxy maintain it, cooperating with a developer
http://overlays.gentoo.org/proj/sunrise/wiki/ProxyMaintainer
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 7:21 AM, sch...@subverted.org wrote:
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 11:04:26PM -0500, Jeremy
El dom, 13-06-2010 a las 14:16 +0300, Petteri Räty escribió:
On 06/11/2010 12:27 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
From my point of view, I would prefer to:
1. Mask caps for net-wireless/bluez on affected arches, letting us to
keep bluez keyworded.
2. Open two bug reports as done with current
media-video/avidemux
Qt team will pick this up ( first herd on metadata.xml ) and I will add
myself as maintainer
Cheers
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Alex Alexander wi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 11:50:38PM +0200, Ben de Groot wrote:
I guess I should have done a proper
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 13-06-2010 08:41, Michał Górny wrote:
Hello,
There are some packages which were 'readded' to the Sunrise overlay
after lying unmaintained in the tree for a long time and finally being
removed. One example could be net-im/ekg2 for removal of
On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 15:07:12 +0300
Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
If you start moving maintainer-needed package on Sunrise then Sunrise
will end up as a garbage collector overlay having many many ebuilds
that nobody will actually maintain. If you care about
maintainer-needed
We ( as treecleaners ) can't move the packages to sunrise. If there are
users out there who want to maintain them either move the ebuilds on sunrise
themselves or proxy maintain them.
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 7:35 PM, Michał Górny gen...@mgorny.alt.pl wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 15:07:12 +0300
On 6/13/10 6:35 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
But who's talking here about moving abandoned ebuilds just to keep
them? I'd wanted just to make it simpler to switch the 'maintainership'
from Gentoo devs to Sunrise users, when the second are ready to
maintain the ebuild well.
Can you suggest a
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto posted on Sun, 13 Jun 2010 14:26:26 + as
excerpted:
there was a proposal to create a sunset overlay, like the java team used
and now kde uses as well. The purpose of this overlay would be to keep
the packages that are removed from the tree because they have no
On 06/13/2010 05:26 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
Wouldn't it be better to officially support moving unmaintained
packages directly into Sunrise? In this case by 'unmaintained' I mean
those which have open bugs assigned to 'maintainer-needed' for a long
time, and are potentially a
El dom, 13-06-2010 a las 14:43 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió:
El dom, 13-06-2010 a las 14:16 +0300, Petteri Räty escribió:
On 06/11/2010 12:27 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
From my point of view, I would prefer to:
1. Mask caps for net-wireless/bluez on affected arches, letting us to
# Matti Bickel m...@gentoo.org (13 Jun 2010)
# Dead upstream (bug #321685)
# Removal on 2010-07-13
dev-php5/jargon
dev-php5/creole
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 06/13/10 16:26, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
If we want to find a way to not drop the maintainer-needed packages, I'd
prefer we move them to sunset and not to sunrise.
Agreed.
If there is a user-maintainer move to sunrise, if there isn't move to
sunset.
As this overlay is
likely to
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2010-06-13 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
x11-plugins/wmmsens 2010-06-07 10:05:44 s4t4n
x11-plugins/wmsensormon 2010-06-07 10:10:25 s4t4n
x11-plugins/wmalms
Final release of Python 2.7 is currently scheduled on 2010-07-03. Snapshots
of Python 2.7 are available in python overlay. Python 2.7 will be initially
masked in gentoo-x86 after release.
I would like to encourage Gentoo developers and users to install a snapshot
of Python 2.7 and test
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 00:29:19 +0200
Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
El dom, 13-06-2010 a las 14:43 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió:
El dom, 13-06-2010 a las 14:16 +0300, Petteri Räty escribió:
On 06/11/2010 12:27 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
From my point of view, I would prefer to:
20 matches
Mail list logo
