[gentoo-dev] Re: Council Election Results

2010-07-09 Thread Torsten Veller
The good old ruby grapher with: ScaleSize= 11 HeightScale = 3 BarHeight= 11 ferringb (1) halcy0n (2) jmbsvicetto | | | | |#| |#|#|# |#|#|# |#

[gentoo-dev] Lastrite: dev-libs/gnome-build

2010-07-09 Thread Pacho Ramos
# Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org (09 Jul 2010) # Masked for removal in 30 days since it's no longer needed now that we # don't have old anjuta versions in the tree, see bug #327593 dev-libs/gnome-build signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[gentoo-dev] svga useflag (media-libs/svgalib)

2010-07-09 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, there are few left packages that still have svga useflag and depend on svgalib. To my best knowledge that stuff has been deprecated to not be used. So my question is which one of the following we should start: Should we slowly remove that useflag

[gentoo-dev] 'State of Gentoo' BoF session, Linux Symposium 2010.

2010-07-09 Thread Robin H. Johnson
Hi all, I had hoped to send this before now, but the exact scheduled timeslot keeps changing. It was already on the PR events calendar. I'm running a BoF session during the Linux Symposium 2010 in Ottawa next week, entitled 'State of Gentoo'.

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-project] 'State of Gentoo' BoF session, Linux Symposium 2010.

2010-07-09 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Friday, July 09, 2010 13:19:04 Robin H. Johnson wrote: Any other Gentoo users/developers attending? i guess i should -mike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-dev] 'State of Gentoo' BoF session, Linux Symposium 2010.

2010-07-09 Thread Philip Webb
100709 Robin H. Johnson wrote: I'm running a BoF session during Linux Symposium 2010 in Ottawa next week, entitled 'State of Gentoo'. http://www.linuxsymposium.org/2010/view_abstract.php?content_key=75 Questions about progress on specific topics are warmly welcomed. Good to know something

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-php5/znf

2010-07-09 Thread Matti Bickel
Late to the party, but anyway: # Matti Bickel m...@gentoo.org (04 Jul 2010) # Dead upstream (bug #324825) # Masked for removal in 30 days dev-php5/znf signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] RFC: removal of virtual/php from depend.php

2010-07-09 Thread Matti Bickel
Hi, in concert with bug 319623 the php team would like to remove virtual/php from the depend.php eclass. This will change DEPEND and RDEPEND strings for quite some packages. The basic idea is: virtual/php is only provided by dev-lang/php and has been for quite some time now. There are no plans

[gentoo-dev] RFC: remove php4 from depend.php and others

2010-07-09 Thread Matti Bickel
Hi, yet another patch from Ole in a bid to rid the php eclasses from some long forgotten code. The patches should be self-explanatory - just rip out everything related to dev-php4 :) Comments welcome. All the work will go into our overlay (slotting branch:

[gentoo-dev] FYI: dropping support for php4

2010-07-09 Thread Matti Bickel
Yeah, we have dropped support for PHP-4 in the tree for ages, but in the php4 overlay it still lives on. This is just a reminder that php4 will be even more broken when the recent patches will get applied. The php team does and will not support installations running on the php4 overlay and will

Re: [gentoo-dev] 'State of Gentoo' BoF session, Linux Symposium 2010.

2010-07-09 Thread Patrick Nagel
Hi, On 2010-07-09 20:59 UTC Philip Webb wrote: 100709 Robin H. Johnson wrote: I'm running a BoF session during Linux Symposium 2010 in Ottawa next week, entitled 'State of Gentoo'. http://www.linuxsymposium.org/2010/view_abstract.php?content_key=75 Questions about progress on specific

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: removal of virtual/php from depend.php

2010-07-09 Thread Doug Goldstein
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Matti Bickel m...@gentoo.org wrote: So we're replacing virtual/php with dev-lang/php in depend.php. Question is: do we need depend.php-r1 for this? Did I miss some important point about the change? Matt, No you don't. You should be free to make the change. --