On 28/10/10 02:33, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
Ok i finished my separation as i said yesterday in some of the mails so
here is the 0.5.0 version with self install script and so on :)
New features:
* sorting based on user decision, version or keywords can be on top
* filtering archs
Implementing
On 28-10-2010 09:25:23 +, Samuli Suominen wrote:
ssuominen10/10/28 09:25:23
Modified: aggregate-1.6.ebuild
Log:
qa
I think it would be good practice if you would give a summary of
what type of QA you applied, even though for you it may be obvious.
I just see lots of unnecessary
Fabian Groffen posted on Thu, 28 Oct 2010 11:30:55 +0200 as excerpted:
On 28-10-2010 09:25:23 +, Samuli Suominen wrote:
ssuominen10/10/28 09:25:23
Modified: aggregate-1.6.ebuild Log:
qa
I think it would be good practice if you would give a summary of what
type of QA you
Le jeudi 28 octobre 2010 à 12:32 +, Samuli Suominen (ssuominen) a
écrit :
ssuominen10/10/28 12:32:21
Modified: blogtk-1.0.ebuild
Log:
header
(Portage version: 2.2.0_alpha1/cvs/Linux x86_64)
Revision ChangesPath
1.7
On 10/28/2010 03:55 PM, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
Le jeudi 28 octobre 2010 à 12:32 +, Samuli Suominen (ssuominen) a
écrit :
ssuominen10/10/28 12:32:21
Modified: blogtk-1.0.ebuild
Log:
header
(Portage version: 2.2.0_alpha1/cvs/Linux x86_64)
Revision
Hi,
It is possible to cancle the cramfs support in util-linux.
Why there is no cramfs use flag for it?
Regards,
Kfir
On Tuesday 26 October 2010 12:11:50 Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday, October 25, 2010 18:17:21 Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Monday 25 October 2010 19:06:45 Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
Il giorno lun, 25/10/2010 alle 18.50 -0300, Alexis Ballier ha scritto:
Am I missing something obvious or is it
On 10/28/2010 12:30 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 28-10-2010 09:25:23 +, Samuli Suominen wrote:
ssuominen10/10/28 09:25:23
Modified: aggregate-1.6.ebuild
Log:
qa
I think it would be good practice if you would give a summary of
what type of QA you applied, even though for you it
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 04:09:43PM +0200, Kfir Lavi wrote:
Hi,
It is possible to cancle the cramfs support in util-linux.
Why there is no cramfs use flag for it?
Regards,
Kfir
You should really need to open a bug for feature requests
--
Markos Chandras (hwoarang)
Gentoo Linux Developer
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 04:09:43PM +0200, Kfir Lavi wrote:
Hi,
It is possible to cancle the cramfs support in util-linux.
Why there is no cramfs use flag for it?
Regards,
Kfir
You should really need to open a bug
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 11:17:41 -0300, Alexis Ballier wrote:
Good luck if you want to fix these issues, I'm pretty sure there
are
hundreds of such warnings in the tree.
You mean thousands? There is no real reason to fix these repoman
warnings in the name of qa ;) Upon commit of an actual
On 28-10-2010 17:20:13 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
I think it would be good practice if you would give a summary of
what type of QA you applied, even though for you it may be obvious.
I just see lots of unnecessary changes that are apparently considered to
be justified by QA.
removal
On 10/28/2010 05:17 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Thursday 28 October 2010 10:02:35 Samuli Suominen wrote:
--- blogtk-1.0.ebuild 26 Jul 2008 22:48:58 - 1.6
+++ blogtk-1.0.ebuild 28 Oct 2010 12:32:21 - 1.7
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
-# Copyright 1999-2007 Gentoo Foundation
+#
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 02:33:09 +0200
Tomáš Chvátal scarab...@gentoo.org wrote:
http://dev.gentooexperimental.org/~scarabeus/eshowkw-0.5.0.tar.xz
Ebuild attached.
You may want to make this slight change:
$ eshowkw-ng --help
[...]
-P, --prefix Do not display prefix keywords in output.
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Tuesday 26 October 2010 12:11:50 Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday, October 25, 2010 18:17:21 Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Monday 25 October 2010 19:06:45 Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
Il giorno lun, 25/10/2010 alle 18.50 -0300, Alexis
On 10/28/10 7:42 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
Il giorno lun, 25/10/2010 alle 18.50 -0300, Alexis Ballier ha scritto:
Am I missing something obvious or is it just hiding a bug in the
linux
headers? I see no usage of INT_MAX in the patched .c file...
the maintainer already has done his due
On 10/28/2010 07:22 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 28-10-2010 17:20:13 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
I think it would be good practice if you would give a summary of
what type of QA you applied, even though for you it may be obvious.
I just see lots of unnecessary changes that are apparently
On 10/28/2010 09:11 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 10/28/2010 12:30 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 28-10-2010 09:25:23 +, Samuli Suominen wrote:
ssuominen10/10/28 09:25:23
Modified: aggregate-1.6.ebuild
Log:
qa
I think it
Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org said:
On 10/28/2010 09:11 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 10/28/2010 12:30 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 28-10-2010 09:25:23 +, Samuli Suominen wrote:
ssuominen10/10/28 09:25:23
Modified:
+# Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org (28 Oct 2010)
+# Fails to compile on x86_64 multilib, bug 150495
+# Fails to build properly with glibc-2.12, bug 341183
+# Fails to build with make-3.82, bug 343129
+# Only builds esound frontend now that arts have been removed from tree,
+# and then fails
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
So now on the eshowkw is part of gentoolkit (in svn, and in next release).
If you want to test it and suggest more features/report bugs you can use
it as follows:
eshowkw [something]
equery keywords something
Cheers
Tomas
-BEGIN PGP
# Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org (29 Oct 2010)
# Replaced by sys-fs/udisks
# Masked for removal in about 30 days
sys-apps/devicekit-disks
devicekit-power soon to follow...
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 23:33:09 +0200
Tomáš Chvátal scarab...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
So now on the eshowkw is part of gentoolkit (in svn, and in next
release). If you want to test it and suggest more features/report
bugs you can use it as follows:
23 matches
Mail list logo
