[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Stabilisation exceptions

2011-01-24 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday, January 24, 2011 07:31:20 Christian Faulhammer wrote: over the course of the years the x86 (and other architectures as well) has given away permissions to maintainers/teams to mark packages stable themselves. As there never was a definitive list what exceptions exist, I compiled a

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Stabilisation exceptions

2011-01-24 Thread Rémi Cardona
Le 24/01/2011 13:31, Christian Faulhammer a écrit : Hi, over the course of the years the x86 (and other architectures as well) has given away permissions to maintainers/teams to mark packages stable themselves. As there never was a definitive list what exceptions exist, I compiled a list

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Stabilisation exceptions

2011-01-24 Thread Markos Chandras
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 01:31:20PM +0100, Christian Faulhammer wrote: Hi, over the course of the years the x86 (and other architectures as well) has given away permissions to maintainers/teams to mark packages stable themselves. As there never was a definitive list what exceptions exist, I

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Stabilisation exceptions

2011-01-24 Thread Anthony G. Basile
On 01/24/2011 07:31 AM, Christian Faulhammer wrote: Hi, over the course of the years the x86 (and other architectures as well) has given away permissions to maintainers/teams to mark packages stable themselves. As there never was a definitive list what exceptions exist, I compiled a list of