[gentoo-dev] Re: mesa r600 gallium news item

2011-08-26 Thread Joshua Saddler
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 23:12:22 +0200 Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn chith...@gentoo.org wrote: Hello, Please see the attached news item for review. The news item should be published before mesa-7.11 goes stable. Corresponding bug report: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=377349 Best

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: mesa r600 gallium news item

2011-08-26 Thread Jesús J . Guerrero Botella
That would probably be a good idea. -- Jesús Guerrero Botella

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoostats, SoC 2011

2011-08-26 Thread Dale
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: I've picked this message as I want to address one point in this thread that was focused on this sub-thread. I disagree with the idea that adding an application to the Gentoo tree that collects data from users and sends it to a central (or distributed) system is

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: mesa r600 gallium news item

2011-08-26 Thread Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
Joshua Saddler schrieb: what about updating the emul-linux-x86-* libraries to use gallium, too? they currently use the classic mesa, judging from the output of eselect mesa list. On amd64 multilib systems, eselect mesa set r600 gallium will switch both mesa and emul-linux-x86-opengl to

[gentoo-dev] License for Google Chrome

2011-08-26 Thread Mike Gilbert
I have been maintaining an ebuild for Google Chrome in an overlay. It basically extracts a deb file to /opt. This serves as an easy alternative for people who do not have the patience to compile Chromium. Now that I have developer access, I would like to move this to the tree. Before doing so, I

Re: [gentoo-dev] License for Google Chrome

2011-08-26 Thread Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 26/08/2011 11:06 μμ, Mike Gilbert wrote: I have been maintaining an ebuild for Google Chrome in an overlay. It basically extracts a deb file to /opt. This serves as an easy alternative for people who do not have the patience to compile

Re: [gentoo-dev] License for Google Chrome

2011-08-26 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote: I think clause 2.2 (B) allows me to avoid a fetch restriction. It is not clear to me how this clause has anything to do with fetch restrictions. Perhaps I used the wrong term here. I mean that 2.2 (B) allows the user

Re: [gentoo-dev] License for Google Chrome

2011-08-26 Thread Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 26-08-2011 22:06, Mike Gilbert wrote: I have been maintaining an ebuild for Google Chrome in an overlay. It basically extracts a deb file to /opt. This serves as an easy alternative for people who do not have the patience to compile Chromium.

Re: [gentoo-dev] License for Google Chrome

2011-08-26 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 9:46 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto jmbsvice...@gentoo.org wrote: when you have doubts about a license and mail the gentoo-dev ml, also cc the licenses alias. Will do. I'm curious, but does Google release a pre-compiled binary that you can use as chrome-bin? That is