Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: proj/portage:master commit in: pym/portage/dbapi/

2011-11-28 Thread Michał Górny
On Sun, 27 Nov 2011 23:28:12 +0100 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfre...@gentoo.org wrote: 2011-11-26 11:58:22 Fabian Groffen napisał(a): On 26-11-2011 01:54:35 +, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: commit: 1d4ac47c28706094230cb2c4e6ee1c1c71629aa0 T Org

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: proj/portage:master commit in: pym/portage/dbapi/

2011-11-28 Thread Rich Freeman
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 3:06 AM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: Have you considered time overhead of moving files in unnatural order? Rather than re-discuss this point it would probably be better for everybody to just read through the entire thread again, particularly Cirian's post and

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages looking for proxy as ian no longer has commit access

2011-11-28 Thread Paul Varner
On Thu, 2011-11-24 at 17:25 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote: On Thu, 24 Nov 2011, Pacho Ramos wrote: Due https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99016 ian doesn't have commit access and, then, his packages need a proxy maintainer: app-portage/autounmask app-portage/demerge I would

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: vim.eclass

2011-11-28 Thread Samuli Suominen
eclass has ChangeLog file now. any particular reason why you skipped it? or is it not meant to be used yet / not mandatory to use yet? since most people seem to skip it. - Samuli On 11/28/2011 08:13 PM, Jim Ramsay (lack) wrote: lack11/11/28 18:13:42 Modified:

[gentoo-dev] Lastrite: dev-perl/Gtk2-Sexy and net-misc/twitux (Masking reverse dependencies of libsexy, part #1)

2011-11-28 Thread Samuli Suominen
# Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org (28 Nov 2011) # Masked for removal in 30 days because of bugs 380193 and 381227 dev-perl/Gtk2-Sexy net-misc/twitux

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: vim.eclass

2011-11-28 Thread Jim Ramsay
Samuli Suominen wrote: eclass has ChangeLog file now. any particular reason why you skipped it? Completely oblivious to its existence, that's all :) I'll (hopefully) remember it next time. or is it not meant to be used yet / not mandatory to use yet? since most people seem to skip it. In