On 02/01/13 17:28, Matt Turner wrote:
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 4:11 AM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
i'd say never. there is no benefit in switching. pkg-config is the default
implementation from freedesktop.org.
pkg-config is now lighter and has less dependencies than before as
In latest portage tree snapshot:
* Digest verification failed:
*
/usr/portage/dev-libs/gobject-introspection/gobject-introspection-1.34.2-r1.ebuild
* Reason: Filesize does not match recorded size
* Got: 2598
* Expected: 2582
The problem is that the directory was apparently included into
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Maxim Kammerer m...@dee.su wrote:
The problem is that the directory was apparently included into daily
snapshot between 00:31:07 UTC (ebuild commit) and 00:31:13 UTC
(Manifest commit). For those that don't remember, CVS does not have
atomic commits, so it's not
On 01/03/2013 02:09 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
In any case, we probably shouldn't spend a whole lot of effort on this
given the somewhat-impending git migration, which neatly solves this
problem. Maybe there's some low-hanging fruit in the commit ordering,
though? I was thinking it might be
On 03/01/13 03:28, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/02/2013 06:11 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El lun, 29-10-2012 a las 10:39 -0400, Rich Freeman escribió:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina
zeroch...@gentoo.org wrote:
I'm
On 03/01/2013 11:30, Samuli Suominen wrote:
Feel free to steal the code used in eselect-pinentry.
It was originally written by mgorny for eselect-sh, but then later
modified by me, and has not had a single bug ever since.
Can I reiterate that it'd be cool to have an eselect tools? :)
--
Pacho Ramos schrieb:
El mar, 25-09-2012 a las 10:21 -0300, Alexis Ballier escribió:
On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 16:49:13 +0200
Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
It is not hard by itself to inherit an eclass. There is just the
limitation, that occurs with an eclass, e.g.:
-the one from mgorny
El jue, 03-01-2013 a las 00:43 +0100, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
escribió:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pacho Ramos schrieb:
Looks like finally you added yourself to metadata but with instructions
to bug-wranglers to CC you and assign to herd. I would like to confirm
El mié, 02-01-2013 a las 18:59 -0500, Mike Gilbert escribió:
On 1/2/2013 6:54 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On 1/2/2013 6:41 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
What is the purpose of this stuff:
if [[ ${___ECLASS_ONCE_EUTILS} != recur -_+^+_- spank ]] ; then
___ECLASS_ONCE_EUTILS=recur -_+^+_- spank
El jue, 03-01-2013 a las 12:41 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió:
[...]
Well, I was referring to this exact case as voip team already pointed
they weren't looking to ekiga stuff and, then, didn't had much sense to
me to see bugs assigned to them instead of real maintainer (will commit
access)
will
This comes from the following gentoo-dev thread:
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/264888
Its usage will lead to the installation of a CONFIGURATION file
under /usr/share/doc/${PF} and show of elog messages with its content
first time package is installed, relying in doc file for
On Jan 3, 2013 6:54 AM, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
El jue, 03-01-2013 a las 12:41 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió:
[...]
Well, I was referring to this exact case as voip team already pointed
they weren't looking to ekiga stuff and, then, didn't had much sense to
me to see bugs
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
If we start to measure the software freedom of the code inside the
package, then maybe LICENSE is the wrong variable to
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote:
We could easily solve this by adding a binary-only or
no-source-code tag to such packages. It would be included in the
@BINARY-REDISTRIBUTABLE license group, but not in @FREE. So such
packages would be excluded for users
El jue, 03-01-2013 a las 09:33 -0500, Jesus Rivero (Neurogeek) escribió:
On Jan 3, 2013 6:54 AM, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
El jue, 03-01-2013 a las 12:41 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió:
[...]
Well, I was referring to this exact case as voip team already
pointed
they weren't
On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 02:01:03PM +0100, Pacho Ramos wrote:
# Copyright 1999-2012 Gentoo Foundation
# Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
# $Header: $
# @ECLASS: configuration-doc
# @MAINTAINER:
# Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org
# @AUTHOR:
# Author: Pacho Ramos
On 01/02/2013 10:13 PM, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 00:25 -0500, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote:
On 01/03/2013 12:06 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 19:49:02 -0800
Paweł Hajdan, Jr. phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote:
It came up again with
El jue, 03-01-2013 a las 14:29 -0600, William Hubbs escribió:
[...]
case ${EAPI:-0} in
0|1|2|3)
die Unsupported EAPI=${EAPI:-0} (too old) for ${ECLASS}
;;
4|5)
# EAPI=4 is required for REPLACING_VERSIONS preventing us
# from
Rich Freeman posted on Thu, 03 Jan 2013 10:40:08 -0500 as excerpted:
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote:
We could easily solve this by adding a binary-only or
no-source-code tag to such packages. It would be included in the
@BINARY-REDISTRIBUTABLE license
On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 10:03:21PM +0100, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El jue, 03-01-2013 a las 14:29 -0600, William Hubbs escribió:
[...]
case ${EAPI:-0} in
0|1|2|3)
die Unsupported EAPI=${EAPI:-0} (too old) for ${ECLASS}
;;
4|5)
# EAPI=4 is required
20 matches
Mail list logo
