On 01/13/2013 04:59 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El dom, 13-01-2013 a las 04:54 -0800, Zac Medico escribió:
On 01/13/2013 04:18 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
What about this approach?
You should use ${SLOT%/*}, in order to exclude the sub-slot, because you
don't care about the sub-slot and the slash
I've seen this pop up a lot recently:
* One or more symlinks to directories have been preserved in order to
* ensure that files installed via these symlinks remain accessible. This
* indicates that the mentioned symlink(s) may be obsolete remnants of an
* old install, and it may be
On 01/14/2013 01:33 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
I've seen this pop up a lot recently:
* One or more symlinks to directories have been preserved in order to
* ensure that files installed via these symlinks remain accessible. This
* indicates that the mentioned symlink(s) may be obsolete
On 13 January 2013 18:06, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 01/13/2013 07:03 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
On 01/13/2013 09:43 AM, hasufell wrote:
On 01/13/2013 03:24 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
Hello,
Right now an attempt to commit an ebuild with no HOMEPAGE results
in:
HOMEPAGE.missing
Steven J. Long wrote:
What I'm not in favour of is making the simple cases more
difficult, to deal with the complex ones. It's completely
brain-dead thinking.
This is exactly what some people think or say when they learn that I
use Gentoo.
I appreciate Gentoo because I am able and willing to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 14/01/13 04:44 AM, Zac Medico wrote:
On 01/14/2013 01:33 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
I've seen this pop up a lot recently:
* One or more symlinks to directories have been preserved in
order to * ensure that files installed via these symlinks
On 01/14/2013 06:46 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
This particular symlink was put there by openrc though, wasn't it?
Yeah, openrc uses the migrate_to_run function from /etc/init.d/bootmisc.
So
I'd expect that on the whole this should be left for openrc to deal
with or otherwise left to the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 14/01/13 09:57 AM, Zac Medico wrote:
On 01/14/2013 06:46 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
This particular symlink was put there by openrc though, wasn't
it?
Yeah, openrc uses the migrate_to_run function from
/etc/init.d/bootmisc.
So I'd
On 01/14/2013 07:09 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
On 14/01/13 09:57 AM, Zac Medico wrote:
On 01/14/2013 06:46 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
This particular symlink was put there by openrc though, wasn't
it?
Yeah, openrc uses the migrate_to_run function from
/etc/init.d/bootmisc.
So I'd
On 01/14/2013 07:44 AM, Zac Medico wrote:
On 01/14/2013 07:09 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
OK i'm a little confused. Putting my earlier note aside, if the
symlink will be auto-cleaned after no packages use it, what's the
point/need for the original message from portage then?? Is it just QA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 14/01/13 10:53 AM, Zac Medico wrote:
On 01/14/2013 07:44 AM, Zac Medico wrote:
On 01/14/2013 07:09 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
OK i'm a little confused. Putting my earlier note aside, if
the symlink will be auto-cleaned after no packages use
On 01/14/2013 08:26 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
On 14/01/13 10:53 AM, Zac Medico wrote:
On 01/14/2013 07:44 AM, Zac Medico wrote:
On 01/14/2013 07:09 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
OK i'm a little confused. Putting my earlier note aside, if
the symlink will be auto-cleaned after no packages use
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 14/01/13 11:36 AM, Zac Medico wrote:
On 01/14/2013 08:26 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
On 14/01/13 10:53 AM, Zac Medico wrote:
On 01/14/2013 07:44 AM, Zac Medico wrote:
On 01/14/2013 07:09 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
OK i'm a little confused.
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 1:47 AM, Alexey Shvetsov ale...@gentoo.org wrote:
В письме от 14 января 2013 00:38:06 пользователь Doug Goldstein написал:
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Alexey Shvetsov ale...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hi!
For cross-chroots its needed to have static qemu-$arch user
On 01/14/2013 11:06 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 13 January 2013 18:06, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 01/13/2013 07:03 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
On 01/13/2013 09:43 AM, hasufell wrote:
On 01/13/2013 03:24 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
Hello,
Right now an attempt to commit an ebuild with no
On 14/01/2013 18:14, Zac Medico wrote:
It might be a lot simpler to just go and patch all the ebuilds that
installed stuff in /var/run with a one-liner like this at the end of
src_install:
It's a good idea to do so to avoid the check coming from portage to
happena nd waste time, but ...
Once
On Sunday, January 13, 2013 06:02:26 PM Michał Górny wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jan 2013 07:36:59 -0800
Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org wrote:
local -i ret
?
Looks good. I didn't even know bash has something like that.
Useless use of -i is usually unhelpful. In Bash (but not all shells), it's
On 01/14/2013 09:23 AM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
On 14/01/2013 18:14, Zac Medico wrote:
It might be a lot simpler to just go and patch all the ebuilds that
installed stuff in /var/run with a one-liner like this at the end of
src_install:
It's a good idea to do so to avoid the check coming
On 14/01/2013 18:32, Zac Medico wrote:
Ah, right! So, those packages also need to be patched to use /run
directly, instead of relying on the symlink.
Or the symlink should just stay for however long that's going to take,
which is probably a good idea, as it does not bother anyone.
I don't
On Sunday, January 13, 2013 01:28:42 PM Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Sunday 13 January 2013 08:29:43 Michał Górny wrote:
+ [[ ${BUILD_DIR} ]] || die ${FUNCNAME}: BUILD_DIR not set.
really should use -n there
Doesn't matter. Only zsh requires it (and pointlessly disagrees with every
other
On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 11:44:58 +0100
Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
Pacho Ramos schrieb:
El mar, 25-09-2012 a las 10:21 -0300, Alexis Ballier escribió:
On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 16:49:13 +0200
Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
It is not hard by itself to inherit an eclass. There is
Hi list!
After introducing eudev, is there any reason to do systemd/udev split?
Yes.
I don't want systemd and I don't want eudev. And I'm not alone I'm sure.
2013/1/14 Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@flameeyes.eu:
I don't want systemd and I don't want eudev. And I'm not alone I'm sure.
You are definitely not alone (though I'm not a gentoo dev).
I think it makes sense to keep it split as long as udev is buildable
without systemd and until eudev proves
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò
flamee...@flameeyes.eu wrote:
I don't want systemd and I don't want eudev. And I'm not alone I'm sure.
++
If it costs me 1200 seconds of CPU time and 40 millicents in
electricity twice I year I can live with that...
Rich
William is packaging upstream udev for Gentoo.
You are shooting the messenger.
I expect there is 0 blame meant for William.
P.s.
Is it William that Lennart dished some blame in the direction of. I
completely disagree. It's not the job of every distro to look for all
build flags to fix
On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 15:04:45 -0300
Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 11:44:58 +0100
Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
Please keep in mind, that the USE flags are different, depending on
your arch. E.g. on amd64, you may additionally have x86 and x32,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 14/01/13 01:06 PM, Oleksii Shevchuk wrote:
Hi list!
After introducing eudev, is there any reason to do systemd/udev
split?
Ask in 6 months to a year, after eudev is fully established and has a
solid track record.
-BEGIN PGP
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 06:04:01AM +, Steven J. Long wrote:
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 William Hubbs wrote:
Steven J. Long wrote:
If you're certain that every user with a current simple setup, who
uses the kernel default names, and has such a firewall setup isn't
going to suddenly find
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 01:59:14PM -0500, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 14/01/13 01:06 PM, Oleksii Shevchuk wrote:
Hi list!
After introducing eudev, is there any reason to do systemd/udev
split?
Ask in 6 months to a year, after eudev
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 2:28 PM, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
The only time I see eudev replacing udev as our default is if the
systemd guys actually kill udev on non-systemd systems.
Seems likely to me, but anticipating about 300 replies to your post, I
think we're all agreed that
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Dan Douglas orm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, January 13, 2013 06:02:26 PM Michał Górny wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jan 2013 07:36:59 -0800
Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org wrote:
local -i ret
?
Looks good. I didn't even know bash has something like that.
Useless
El lun, 14-01-2013 a las 18:15 +0100, hasufell escribió:
[...]
+1 to allow empty/missing HOMEPAGE variable
dead homepage = useless
http://gentoo.org = useless
https://bugs.gentoo.org = too obvious
An empty homepage usually means the package is dead. I'd rather see
the
[CC'ing this to core so noone can complain afterwards.]
Since 48h did not lead to any responses positive or negative, I'll start
implementing the procedure as given in the original e-mail (quoted below).
As also said below, each arch will get a mail before I touch their profile
tree and after
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 14/01/13 03:15 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El lun, 14-01-2013 a las 18:15 +0100, hasufell escribió: [...]
+1 to allow empty/missing HOMEPAGE variable
dead homepage = useless http://gentoo.org = useless
https://bugs.gentoo.org = too obvious
El lun, 14-01-2013 a las 15:49 -0500, Ian Stakenvicius escribió:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 14/01/13 03:15 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El lun, 14-01-2013 a las 18:15 +0100, hasufell escribió: [...]
+1 to allow empty/missing HOMEPAGE variable
dead homepage = useless
On Monday 14 January 2013 15:15:03 Pacho Ramos wrote:
El lun, 14-01-2013 a las 18:15 +0100, hasufell escribió:
[...]
+1 to allow empty/missing HOMEPAGE variable
dead homepage = useless
http://gentoo.org = useless
https://bugs.gentoo.org = too obvious
An empty homepage
On Monday 14 January 2013 12:55:29 Dan Douglas wrote:
On Sunday, January 13, 2013 01:28:42 PM Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Sunday 13 January 2013 08:29:43 Michał Górny wrote:
+ [[ ${BUILD_DIR} ]] || die ${FUNCNAME}: BUILD_DIR not set.
really should use -n there
Doesn't matter. Only zsh
William Hubbs wrote:
I have a bug opened with the docs team and release engineering
to discuss whether we want the new names for new installs.
IMO yes we do.
What's that bug - or what is the good way to thumbs up/down?
//Peter
pgpswXbIiseJI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 01:25:01AM +0100, Peter Stuge wrote:
William Hubbs wrote:
I have a bug opened with the docs team and release engineering
to discuss whether we want the new names for new installs.
IMO yes we do.
What's that bug - or what is the good way to thumbs up/down?
Mike Frysinger posted on Mon, 14 Jan 2013 17:09:51 -0500 as excerpted:
+ [[ ${BUILD_DIR} ]] || die ${FUNCNAME}: BUILD_DIR not set.
really should use -n there
Doesn't matter.
the point wasn't will it work. it's more how easy is it to glance at
code and know what it is doing.
Indeed.
I'm trying to make Chromium be more compatible with more versions of
ffmpeg:
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/topic/chromium-dev/fm5Oe_AC3Sc/discussion
(although not stated there, that includes libav).
Now the initial response there is not enthusiastic (which doesn't
surprise me), but
On Tuesday, January 15, 2013 03:20:20 AM Duncan wrote:
Mike Frysinger posted on Mon, 14 Jan 2013 17:09:51 -0500 as excerpted:
+ [[ ${BUILD_DIR} ]] || die ${FUNCNAME}: BUILD_DIR not set.
really should use -n there
Doesn't matter.
the point wasn't will it work. it's more how
Hi folks,
this commit changes the set of USE flags on the just stabled gcc-4.6,
running a huge number into an rebuild of an freshly updated package.
(emerge --newuse recaclulates from go disabled to go missing)
Wouldn't it be possible to
a) refrain from this change (really, who has USE=go turned
Although the eclass does 'multilib?' only now, in the future it is
likely to use more fine-tuned ABI flags.
---
gx86/eclass/autotools-multilib.eclass | 12
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gx86/eclass/autotools-multilib.eclass
b/gx86/eclass/autotools-multilib.eclass
45 matches
Mail list logo
