-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
While I tend towards the cleaner design, not the don't fix what isn't
*broken* approach -- I'm fine either way. But I think the handbook or
some tool should obnoxiously spit the flags (and a minor
justification for each flag and/or the set of flags)
El mar, 22-01-2013 a las 08:16 +0100, Tomáš Chvátal escribió:
2013/1/21 Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org:
This can be useful when, for example, doc contents are modified. You can
then rely on using REPLACING_VERSIONS in your ebuild to print messages
when people updates from versions using old
On 22 January 2013 03:56, Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 01/21/2013 07:45 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
My suspicion is that portage's environment save/restore process will
overwrite any setting I attempt to make on the destination host.
If necessary, you can use /etc/portage/bashrc to
2013/1/22 Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org:
El mar, 22-01-2013 a las 08:16 +0100, Tomáš Chvátal escribió:
Would'nt be better to just set some variable in the ebuild, rather
than call function that touches empty file?
Tom
I think it can be done in either way... but I don't see the advantage of
Il 22/01/2013 04:38, Robin H. Johnson ha scritto:
I'm raising this patch because of the recent spate of bugs with the
latest udev that now fails to boot your system if CONFIG_DEVTMPFS is
not available in your kernel.
Bugs: 408947, 409393, 437320, 453074
CONFIG_CHECK has not been fatal for
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 6:11 AM, viv...@gmail.com viv...@gmail.com wrote:
IMHO the number of cases where CONFIG_CHECK is reliable is so small that
making it fatal will only bloat make.conf and env with a new var for most
users.
Tend to agree. I just got an elog out of udisks complaining about
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 2:22 AM, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 22 January 2013 03:28, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Dustin C. Hatch admiraln...@gmail.com
wrote:
The package defaults have gotten out of hand, in my opinion. I use
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 3:03 AM, Alexander Berntsen
alexan...@plaimi.net wrote:
While I tend towards the cleaner design, not the don't fix what isn't
*broken* approach -- I'm fine either way. But I think the handbook or
some tool should obnoxiously spit the flags (and a minor
justification
On Wednesday, January 16, 2013 07:14:12 PM Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
Dne So 12. ledna 2013 14:49:52, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. napsal(a):
Please review attached automatically generated stabilization candidates
for January.
I don't want to annoy people with automatically filed bugs, and at the
same
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 22/01/13 13:12, Rich Freeman wrote:
As a long-time user, I can't put myself in a first-time user's frame of
reference. But it would be useful for me whenever I'm installing
Gentoo on a new device, if I were able to have the profile's USE-flags
On 13.1.2013 0.49, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
Please review attached automatically generated stabilization candidates
for January.
I don't want to annoy people with automatically filed bugs, and at the
same time I also received lots of positive feedback about the effort to
keep the stable
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:10:12PM +0100, Theo Chatzimichos wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 1:25 AM, Robin H. Johnson robb...@gentoo.org wrote:
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2013-01-20 23h59 UTC.
How about sending
2013/1/22 Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org:
I have an RSS feed for this purpose at:
http://gentoo.petteriraty.eu/stable.rss
Sources are available here:
https://github.com/betelgeuse/scripts/blob/master/rss-changelog
Maybe this is something that should be pushed to official Gentoo
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 13.1.2013 0.49, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
Please review attached automatically generated stabilization candidates
for January.
I don't want to annoy people with automatically filed bugs, and at the
same time I also
On 01/22/2013 01:22 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 22 January 2013 03:56, Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 01/21/2013 07:45 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
My suspicion is that portage's environment save/restore process will
overwrite any setting I attempt to make on the destination host.
If
On 01/21/2013 10:22 PM, Sergey Popov wrote:
22.01.2013 08:23, Mike Gilbert wrote:
I guess this change is ok, given that I can opt-out fairly easily. Zac's
workaround for binary packages makes me feel better too.
I am curious, can not this check be added to eclass? Or eclass does not
know
El mar, 22-01-2013 a las 10:33 +0100, Tomáš Chvátal escribió:
2013/1/22 Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org:
El mar, 22-01-2013 a las 08:16 +0100, Tomáš Chvátal escribió:
Would'nt be better to just set some variable in the ebuild, rather
than call function that touches empty file?
Tom
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 06:51:54AM -0800, Zac Medico wrote:
On 01/21/2013 10:22 PM, Sergey Popov wrote:
22.01.2013 08:23, Mike Gilbert wrote:
I guess this change is ok, given that I can opt-out fairly easily. Zac's
workaround for binary packages makes me feel better too.
I am curious,
Rich Freeman posted on Tue, 22 Jan 2013 07:12:06 -0500 as excerpted:
Should we therefore list all the flags on the system and which ones are
enabled and disabled?
I guess we could, but it is a REALLY long list.
In practice I find that the way I tend to use USE flags is that I just
ignore
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 02:06:29PM +0100, Alexander Berntsen wrote
As a long-time user, I can't put myself in a first-time user's frame
of reference. But it would be useful for me whenever I'm installing
Gentoo on a new device, if I were able to have the profile's USE-flags
listed. (I know I
On Tue, 2013-01-22 at 14:44 +0100, Theo Chatzimichos wrote:
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 13.1.2013 0.49, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
Please review attached automatically generated stabilization candidates
for January.
I don't want to annoy
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 10:57 PM, Brian Dolbec dol...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, 2013-01-22 at 14:44 +0100, Theo Chatzimichos wrote:
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 13.1.2013 0.49, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
Please review attached automatically
On Wed, 2013-01-23 at 01:15 -0200, Rafael Goncalves Martins wrote:
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 10:57 PM, Brian Dolbec dol...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, 2013-01-22 at 14:44 +0100, Theo Chatzimichos wrote:
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org
wrote:
On 13.1.2013
Dne Út 22. ledna 2013 19:37:12, Pacho Ramos napsal(a):
I agree, thanks for pointing it. Just attached patch should handle it.
Still not nice enough for me :D
Use the ECLASS_VARIABLE to describe it @DEFAULT_UNSET is what you seek, see
git-2.eclass.
Tom
signature.asc
Description: This is a
24 matches
Mail list logo
