On 8 February 2013 02:27, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 02/07/2013 05:00 PM, Ian Whyman wrote:
!!! ERROR !!! SYSTEM ERROR !!! SYSTEM FAIL !!!
Yikes. I didn't touch anything, honest!
lets hope infra will
!!! ERROR !!! SYSTEM ERROR !!! SYSTEM FAIL !!!
Yikes. I didn't touch anything, honest!
lets hope infra will ban him from the list
What's with all the leniency? I thought we used the death penalty on
the first offense?
Oh I am sorry. I didn't realize you like spammers on this
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
Live a little. Send a funny email to a list once.
aight boss
On 8 February 2013 09:38, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
!!! ERROR !!! SYSTEM ERROR !!! SYSTEM FAIL !!!
Yikes. I didn't touch anything, honest!
lets hope infra will ban him from the list
What's with all the leniency? I thought we used the death penalty on
the first offense?
On 8 February 2013 00:31, Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 8:07 AM, Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote:
I always wondered why we are using such bulky names like
CCPL-Attribution-ShareAlike-2.5 for the Creative Commons licenses,
instead of CC-BY-SA-2.5 like
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Brian Dolbec dol...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Fri, 2013-02-08 at 09:03 +0200, Kfir Lavi wrote:
Hi,
I'm the author of bashlibs - general library framework and libraries
for bash programing.
I have created new overlay for bash libraries.
On Fri, 8 Feb 2013, Ben de Groot wrote:
On 8 February 2013 00:31, Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 8:07 AM, Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote:
So, while in general I'm against renaming of licenses (e.g.,
it would be pointless to rename our GPL-2 to GPL-2.0 in
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 7:10 AM, Kfir Lavi lavi.k...@gmail.com wrote:
How people serve binaries (tar.gz source files) to complement the
repository?
Github doesn't seem to have a way to have a binary repository and serve
single files.
Heroku maybe?
Single files - not sure (maybe a raw URL?).
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 2:40 AM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 8 February 2013 09:38, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
!!! ERROR !!! SYSTEM ERROR !!! SYSTEM FAIL !!!
Yikes. I didn't touch anything, honest!
lets hope infra will ban him from the list
What's with all
Any objections if I slap a generic package.mask on every firmware
package installing to wrong directory?
Half of them install to /$(get_libdir)/firmware as opposed to correct
/lib/firmware.
Most of them are maintainer-needed@ and very old.
Then intrested parties get to fix what they want and
On 08/02/2013 18:53, Samuli Suominen wrote:
Then intrested parties get to fix what they want and unmask?
I would say that we might want to review linux-firmware, and if the
newest firmware _is_ there, just get rid of the split one.
--
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu —
2013/2/8 Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@flameeyes.eu:
On 08/02/2013 18:53, Samuli Suominen wrote:
Then intrested parties get to fix what they want and unmask?
I would say that we might want to review linux-firmware, and if the
newest firmware _is_ there, just get rid of the split one.
That
El vie, 08-02-2013 a las 19:01 +0100, Diego Elio Pettenò escribió:
On 08/02/2013 18:53, Samuli Suominen wrote:
Then intrested parties get to fix what they want and unmask?
I would say that we might want to review linux-firmware, and if the
newest firmware _is_ there, just get rid of the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 08/02/13 01:14 PM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
2013/2/8 Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@flameeyes.eu:
On 08/02/2013 18:53, Samuli Suominen wrote:
Then intrested parties get to fix what they want and unmask?
I would say that we might want to review
Rich Freeman wrote:
any tag in Github can be downloaded as a tarball with a constant md5
Note that gitweb also offers snapshot links. Many upstream gitwebs
have that feature enabled, saving even the work of mirroring to github.
//Peter
On Thursday 07 of February 2013 06:52:44 Peter Stuge wrote:
Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
we as gentoo will provide both while preffered default will be what
major distros use.
What kind of careless mainstream attitude is that? Really?
Quite the opposite, decision to use implementation A over B
On Fri, 08 Feb 2013 22:41:04 +0100
Maciej Mrozowski reave...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday 07 of February 2013 06:52:44 Peter Stuge wrote:
Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
we as gentoo will provide both while preffered default will be
what major distros use.
What kind of careless mainstream
* *
* PLEACE SAFE THE SOURCE *
* *
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Stefan Ehret eh...@planetpurple.net wrote:
* *
* PLEACE SAFE THE SOURCE *
* *
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 1:14 AM, Martin Pluskal mar...@pluskal.org wrote:
I am thinking about creating ebuild for shim. I was wondering if there
is any policy or suggestion where to place .efi binaries or how to
handle them in gentoo - it seems that there is none so perhaps there
should be
20 matches
Mail list logo
